Skip to content

· Private foundation

Lawlor Family Charitable Trust

Its FY2026 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$17k
Granted FY2026still arriving
10
Grants FY2026still arriving
1
States reached
$5k
Largest
01What it funds
0199% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2026.

Human Services$56kEducation$42kHousing & Shelter$19kFood & Nutrition$14kHealth$13kPublic Benefit$10kRecreation & Sports$6kCommunity Improvement$6kOther$0
02FY2026 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$1,500
Median grant
1
States reached
$341k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CONCERNED DEWITT CITIZENS$5,000
ST JOSEPH SCHOOL$2,852
CLINTON SALVATION ARMY$2,000
CAFE ON VINE$1,500
HUMILTY OF MARY CENTER$1,500
VINCE JETTER COMMUNITY CENTER$1,000
LIFE CONNECTIONS PEER RECOVERY HOUS$1,000
DOLLY PARTON IMAGINATION LIBRARY$1,000
DEWITT VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT$500
CENTRAL COMMUNITY SCHOOLS$500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY22–26, $32k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 84% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%CAFE ON VINE: $2k → 12%CONCERNED DEWITT CITIZENS: $6k → 13%CAFE ON VINE: $2k → 12%CAFE ON VINE: $1k → 12%CAFE ON VINE: $1k → 12%CONCERNED DEWITT CITIZENS: $5k → 13%CONCERNED DEWITT CITIZENS: $3k → 13%CONCERNED DEWITT CITIZENS: $3k → 13%CONCERNED DEWITT CITIZENS: $3k → 13%CONCERNED DEWITT CITIZENS: $3k → 13%CONCERNED DEWITT CITIZENS: $2k → 13%CONCERNED DEWITT CITIZENS: $2k → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

93%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$173k · 24 repeat orgs$13k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +100% since the first grant, against +56% for those funded once.

24 repeat relationships: 10 still active in FY2026, 14 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

24
7

Total granted

$173k
$13k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+100%
+56%

Still filing today

25%
29%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2026, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25’26
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25’26
Human ServicesHealthRecreation & SportsInternationalPublic Safety & DisasterOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CD
    CONCERNED DEWITT CITIZENS LTD
    5× · 2022–2026 · $27k · revenue +266%
  • CO
    CAFE ON VINE
    5× · 2017–2026 · $8k · revenue +37%
  • BB
    BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF CENTRAL IOWA
    4× · 2017–2020 · $4k · revenue +119%

Funded once

  • SO
    SISTERS OF ST FRANCES
    one grant, 2017 · $3k
  • WV
    WELTON VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPT
    one grant, 2018 · $3k
  • CC
    CLINTON COUNTY AGRICULTURAL SOCIETY
    one grant, 2017 · $2k · revenue -28%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Ringgold County Fair Association

County fair to exhibit to the public cattle and livestock shows, 4-h exhibits and commercial activities of the residents of ringgold county, iowa.

Recreation & Sports
2
Community Market of Pott Count

To provide consistent food acces to those in need in the greater pottawatomie county area.

Food & Nutrition
3
Des Moines Area Association of Realtors Foundation
Education
4
Community Crisis Services and Food Bank

Community crisis services and food bank is a volunteer-driven organization that provides immediate and non-judgmental support for individuals facing emotional, food, or financial crisis.

Human Services
5
Central Illinois Board of Realtors

To provide support to realtors and those afffiliated with real estate sales. to facilitate membership in the national association of realtors, to provide a safe, secure way for members of the public to provide access to homes and…

—
6
Johnson City Vol Fire Dept

Protect lives and property from fire/disaster

Public Safety & Disaster
7
Des Moines Golf and Country Club Educational Foundation
—
8
United Way of Clinton County Iowa

To provide leadership in our communities to 1) identify our most pressing human care needs, 2) to work together to direct the time, energy and resources towards addressing those needs to improve our quality of life.

—
9
Community Action of Eastern Iowa

Community action of eastern iowa respectfully partners with people to improve their health, finances, and education.

Community Improvement
10
Poweshiek County Fair Association

4-h/ffa fair

—
11
Corinth Volunteer Fire Department

Fire & emergency response

—
12
Iowa County Fair Incorporated

To provide a youth achievement show.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Concerned Dewitt Citizens Ltd; the most unlike its peers is Dewitt Volunteer Fire Department. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 31 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
5/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ST JOSEPH SCHOOL: $22,600 · OtherST JOSEPH SCHOOLREFERRAL CENTER OF DEWITT: $16,000 · OtherREFERRAL CENTER OF DEWITTHUMILTY OF MARY CENTER: $12,000 · OtherHUMILTY OF MARY CENTERDOLLY PARTON IMAGINATION LIBRARY: $10,500 · OtherDOLLY PARTON IMAGINATION LIBRARYCITY OF DEWITT: $10,000 · OtherCITY OF DEWITTCLINTON SALVATION ARMY: $10,000 · OtherCLINTON SALVATION ARMYVICTORY CENTER RESCUE MISSION: $7,000 · OtherPAUL SHARAR FOUNDATION: $6,950 · OtherLIFE CONNECTION PEER RECOVERY HOUSE: $5,000 · Other+15 more: $37,825 · Other+15 moreCONCERNED DEWITT CITIZENS LTD: $27,000 · Human ServicesCONCERNED DEWITT CITI…CAFE ON VINE: $8,000 · Human ServicesCAFE ON VINECROSSROADS HEALTH FOUNDATION: $5,000 · HealthLIFE CONNECTIONS PEER RECOVERY SERV: $3,000 · HealthDEWITT VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT: $2,000 · Public Safety & DisasterCLINTON COUNTY AGRICULTURAL SOCIETY: $2,000 · Recreation & SportsJUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT OF THE HEARTLAND INC: $800 · International
Other$137,875Human Services$35,000Health$8,000Public Safety & Disaster$2,000Recreation & Sports$2,000International$800

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCONCERNED DEWITT CITIZENS LTD: $27,000 over 5y, 1.7% of budgetCAFE ON VINE: $8,000 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetCROSSROADS HEALTH FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 3y, 0.9% of budgetBIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF CENTRAL IOWA: $4,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetLIFE CONNECTIONS PEER RECOVERY SERV: $3,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetDEWITT VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT: $2,000 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetCLINTON COUNTY AGRICULTURAL SOCIETY: $2,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetJUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT OF THE HEARTLAND INC: $800 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds CONCERNED DEWITT CITIZENS LTD ↗
  • Who funds CAFE ON VINE ↗
  • Who funds CROSSROADS HEALTH FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF CENTRAL IOWA ↗
  • Who funds LIFE CONNECTIONS PEER RECOVERY SERV ↗
  • Who funds DEWITT VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT ↗
  • Who funds CLINTON COUNTY AGRICULTURAL SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds JUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT OF THE HEARTLAND INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Community Foundation of Greater DubuqueIA13.5× affinity4 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Community Foundation of Greater Dubuque · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Lawlor Family Charitable Trust funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Lawlor Family Charitable Trust. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 31 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2026, released 2026. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Lawlor Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph