Skip to content

· Private foundation

Laverne & Thomas Howell Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$784k
Granted FY2025still arriving
25
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$357k
Largest
01What it funds
0198% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Religion$2.6MHealth$623kFood & Nutrition$506kEducation$496kHousing & Shelter$474kPhilanthropy$450kHuman Services$306kRecreation & Sports$189kOther$0
02FY2025 · 25 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k2 grants · $10k
  • $10k–50k21 grants · $367k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $50k
  • $250k+1 grant · $357k
$15,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$14M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
FIRST UNITED METHODIST CHURCH OF CC$357,000
COASTAL BEND COMMUNITY FOUNDATION$50,000
TIMON'S MINISTRIES$30,000
COMPASSIONATE CARE MEDICAL CLINIC$30,000
AMERICAN HEART ASSOCIATION$30,000
CORPUS CHRISTI METRO MINISTRIES$25,000
REFORMED UNIVERSITY FELLOWSHIP$25,000
TENNIS SUCCESS INC$25,000
FOSTER VILLAGE CORPUS CHRISTI$25,000
AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY$20,000
AGAPE RANCH$20,000
COASTAL BEND FOOD BANK$17,092
CASA OF THE COASTAL BEND$15,000
COMMUNITIES IN SCHOOL$15,000
Individual grant recipient$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $382k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 97% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%GOOD SAMARITAN COMMUNITY SERVICES: $44k → 16%THE FIRST METHODIST CHILDREN'S HOME: $15k → 16%METHODIST CHILDREN'S HOME: $15k → 16%METHODIST CHILDREN'S HOME: $15k → 16%JUST SAY YES: $10k → 5%THE FIRST METHODIST CHILDREN'S HOME: $15k → 16%THE FIRST METHODIST CHILDREN'S HOME: $10k → 16%THE FIRST METHODIST CHILDREN'S HOME: $10k → 16%THE METHODIST CHILDREN'S HOME: $15k → 17%METHODIST CHILDREN'S HOME: $15k → 17%THE METHODIST CHILDREN'S HOME: $15k → 17%FOSTER ANGELS OF SOUTH TEXAS: $10k → 17%FOSTER ANGELS OF SOUTH TEXAS: $10k → 17%FAMILY COUNSELING SERVICE: $5k → 17%MISSION OF MERCY INC: $50k → 17%GOOD SAMARITAN RESCUE MISSION: $30k → 17%MISSION OF MERCY INC: $30k → 17%GOOD SAMARITAN RESCUE MISSION: $20k → 17%MISSION OF MERCY INC: $20k → 17%GOOD SAMARITAN RESCUE MISSION: $10k → 17%GOOD SAMARITAN RESCUE MISSION: $8k → 17%MARY MCLEOD BETHUNE EARLY CHILD: $5k → 17%MARY MCLEOD BETHUNE EARLY CHILD: $5k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 8% of Laverne & Thomas Howell Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 99% of the giving stays in TX; by stated purpose, 92%.

Laverne & Thomas Howell Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

95%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$5.5M · 33 repeat orgs$301k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +25% since the first grant, against +18% for those funded once.

33 repeat relationships: 16 still active in FY2025, 17 since wound down; 8 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

33
15

Total granted

$5.5M
$186k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+25%
+18%

Still filing today

55%
40%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 84% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $115k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesHealthFood & NutritionRecreation & SportsYouth DevelopmentEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TM
    TIMON'S MINISTRIES
    9× · 2017–2025 · $289k · revenue +12%
  • CB
    COASTAL BEND FOOD BANK
    9× · 2017–2025 · $211k · revenue +47%
  • TS
    TENNIS SUCCESS INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $144k · revenue +174%

Funded once

  • GS
    GOOD SAMARITAN CENTER OF SAN ANTONIO
    one grant, 2021 · $44k · revenue +7%
  • CS
    Christus Spohn Health System Corporation
    one grant, 2017 · $20k · revenue +18%
  • SA
    SALVATION ARMY
    one grant, 2021 · $15k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Central Texas Children's Home

To provide family services and to provide residential child care for dependent children where there is a need to assist children and families disrupted by problems.

Human Services
2
Central Texas Christian School Inc

To educate students with the transforming truth of christ, inspiring academic excellence, godly character, and integrity in life pursuits.

—
3
Christus Health Foundation of Southeast Texas

Christus health foundation of southeast texas serves the philanthropic needs of christus health southeast texas by soliciting and distributing contributions in support of christus health southeast texas.

—
4
San Antonio Christian School

Partner with families to provide students a christ-centered education while fostering a life of faith and service. the school desires to associate with like-minded teachers, administrators, staff, parents, and students to communicate the…

—
5
Christian Community Service Center Inc

The mission of Christian Community Service Center, Inc. (CCSC) is to serve the poor, hungry, disabled and otherwise needy while respecting their religious, ethnic, or cultural differences.

Human Services
6
Catholic Charities of Corpus Christi Inc

To provide service to people in need and to address social ills that undermind the dignity of the person. the ultimate goal of catholic charities is to create positive life changing opportunities for those in need without regard to color,…

—
7
Christian Family Care Agency Inc

The mission of christian family care is to strengthen families and serve at-risk children in the name of jesus christ. the outcome of our work results in building flourishing families and communities focusing on three pillars: preserve,…

Human Services
8
Children's Aid Society of West Tx Inc

To provide shelter, supervision, and counseling for children in crisis; to cooperate with other agencies in order to resolve problems related to the welfare of these children; to assist the families of these children in seeking possible…

Human Services
9
Christ Central Camp

Inspired by adherence to the teachings of the Catholic Church to operate a facility used for retreats, workshops, camps, and worship for the educational and spiritual enrichment of the youth and young adults of Southeast Texas. Christ…

Religion
10
Sunny Glen Children's Home Inc

Sunny Glen Childrens Home, Inc. cares for children in need. Our care will be competent, compassionate and professional. We will help every child achieve their greatest potential-physically, emotionally, spiritually and academically.

Human Services
11
Christian Services for Children in Alabama

The mission of christian services for children in alabama is to show the love of christ by providing counseling and other related services to children and their families.

—
12
Communities in Schools of Central Texas

Communities in schools of central texas (cisct) ensures students have holistic support, removing academic and nonacademic barriers to their success in school.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Corpus Christi Metro Ministriesinc; the most unlike its peers is Sea City Work Camp Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

30 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 30 of the 57 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
7
Early backer (in before they grew)
28/30
Grantees still filing
20/30
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

FIRST UNITED METHODIST CHURCH OF CC: $2,503,152 · OtherFIRST UNITED METHODIST CHURCH OF CCSAN AUGUSTINE FIRST UNITED: $250,000 · OtherSAN AUGUSTINE FIRST UNITEDTEXAS A&M CORPUS CHRISTI: $241,000 · OtherTEXAS A&M CORPUS CHRISTI+33 more: $952,825 · Other+33 moreCORPUS CHRISTI METRO MINISTRIESINC: $295,000 · Human ServicesCORPUS CHRIS…METHODIST CHILDREN'S HOME: $125,000 · Human ServicesMETHODIST CH…MISSION OF MERCY INC: $100,000 · Human ServicesMISSION OF M…GOOD SAMARITAN RESCUE MISSION: $68,000 · Human ServicesGOOD SAMARIT…GOOD SAMARITAN CENTER OF SAN ANTONIO: $44,000 · Human ServicesGOOD SAMARIT…SEA CITY WORK CAMP INC: $30,000 · Human Services+4 more: $45,000 · Human Services+4 moreTIMON'S MINISTRIES: $288,500 · Food & NutritionTIMON'S M…COASTAL BEND FOOD BANK: $211,331 · Food & NutritionCOASTAL B…COASTAL BEND COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $450,000 · Philanthropy+1 more: $10,000 · PhilanthropyAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $260,000 · HealthAmerican Heart Association Inc: $70,000 · HealthCOMPASSIONATE CARE MEDICAL CLINIC: $50,000 · HealthChristus Spohn Health System Corporation: $20,000 · HealthTENNIS SUCCESS INC: $144,000 · Recreation & SportsCORPUS CHRISTI SAILING FOUNDATION: $5,000 · Recreation & SportsANNAPOLIS CHRISTIAN ACADEMY: $85,000 · Education
Other$3,946,977Human Services$707,000Food & Nutrition$499,831Philanthropy$460,000Health$400,000Recreation & Sports$149,000Education$85,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCOASTAL BEND COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $450,000 over 9y, 0.5% of budgetCORPUS CHRISTI METRO MINISTRIESINC: $295,000 over 9y, 2.3% of budgetTIMON'S MINISTRIES: $288,500 over 9y, 13% of budgetAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $260,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetCOASTAL BEND FOOD BANK: $211,331 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetTENNIS SUCCESS INC: $144,000 over 9y, 7.4% of budgetMETHODIST CHILDREN'S HOME: $125,000 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetMISSION OF MERCY INC: $100,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetANNAPOLIS CHRISTIAN ACADEMY: $85,000 over 4y, 0.9% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc: $70,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetCOURT APPOINTED SPECIAL ADVOCATES C: $68,000 over 6y, 1.8% of budgetGOOD SAMARITAN RESCUE MISSION: $68,000 over 4y, 1.8% of budgetWEST SIDE HELPING HAND: $65,000 over 5y, 6.9% of budgetCOMPASSIONATE CARE MEDICAL CLINIC: $50,000 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetCORPUS CHRISTI HOPE HOUSE INC: $45,000 over 4y, 1.7% of budgetGOOD SAMARITAN CENTER OF SAN ANTONIO: $44,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetAIM FOR SUCCESS INC: $35,000 over 3y, 3.7% of budgetSEA CITY WORK CAMP INC: $30,000 over 4y, 6.3% of budgetReach Ministries: $25,000 over 2y, 8.4% of budgetChristus Spohn Health System Corporation: $20,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFOSTER ANGELS OF SOUTH TEXAS FOUNDATION: $20,000 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetAgape Harbor: $10,000 over 2y, 3.9% of budgetFELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetYOUTH EQUIPPED TO SUCCEED: $10,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetCORPUS CHRISTI EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 1y, 3.2% of budgetMary Mcleod Bethune Early Childhood Development Dev: $10,000 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetCORPUS CHRISTI SAILING FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 1y, 3.3% of budgetFAMILY COUNSELING SERVICE: $5,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds COASTAL BEND COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds CORPUS CHRISTI METRO MINISTRIESINC ↗
  • Who funds TIMON'S MINISTRIES ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC ↗
  • Who funds COASTAL BEND FOOD BANK ↗
  • Who funds TENNIS SUCCESS INC ↗
  • Who funds METHODIST CHILDREN'S HOME ↗
  • Who funds MISSION OF MERCY INC ↗
  • Who funds ANNAPOLIS CHRISTIAN ACADEMY ↗
  • Who funds American Heart Association Inc ↗
  • Who funds COURT APPOINTED SPECIAL ADVOCATES C ↗
  • Who funds GOOD SAMARITAN RESCUE MISSION ↗
  • Who funds WEST SIDE HELPING HAND ↗
  • Who funds COMPASSIONATE CARE MEDICAL CLINIC ↗
  • Who funds CORPUS CHRISTI HOPE HOUSE INC ↗
  • Who funds GOOD SAMARITAN CENTER OF SAN ANTONIO ↗
  • Who funds AIM FOR SUCCESS INC ↗
  • Who funds SEA CITY WORK CAMP INC ↗
  • Who funds Reach Ministries ↗
  • Who funds Christus Spohn Health System Corporation ↗
  • Who funds FOSTER ANGELS OF SOUTH TEXAS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds AGAPE RANCH ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Ed Rachal FoundationTX42.7× affinity18 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Ed Rachal Foundation · Behmann Brothers Foundation · Allen Lovelace Moore and Blanche Davis Moore Foundation · The John G and Marie Stella Kenedy Memorial Foundation · Coastal Bend Community Foundation · Earl C Sams Foundation Inc · United Way of the Coastal Bend Inc · Jack and Susie Dugan Family Foundation · Estill Foundation · Gil and Dody Weaver Foundation · Dr and Mrs Hugh a Kennedy Foundation · Bethel Hesed

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Laverne & Thomas Howell Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Laverne & Thomas Howell Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    9report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Laverne & Thomas Howell Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Laverne & Thomas Howell Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 57 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Laverne & Thomas Howell’s filings →

    More from the funding graph