Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Lavere & Gladys Chase Scholarship Fd

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$25k
Granted FY2025still arriving
15
Grants FY2025still arriving
5
States reached
$4k
Largest
01What you fund
0199% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Education$236kHealth$27kOther$0
02FY2025 · 15 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$1,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$670k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
JACKSON COLLEGE$4,400
WESTERN MICHIGAN UNIVERSITY$4,000
GRAND VALLEY STATE UNIVERSITY$3,000
CENTRAL MICHIGAN UNIVERSITY$1,400
BAKER COLLEGE$1,400
SAGINAW VALLEY STATE UNIVERSITY$1,400
MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY$1,400
EASTERN MICHIGAN UNIVERSITY$1,000
UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN$1,000
DAVENPORT UNIVERSITY$1,000
ROBERT MORRIS UNIVERSITY$1,000
ALFRED UNIVERSITY$1,000
KALAMAZOO COLLEGE$1,000
OKLAHOMA STATE UNIVERSITY$1,000
UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA BOARD OF TRUSTEES$1,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 92% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%BETHEL UNIVERSITY SCHOLARSHIP: $2k → 14%ROBERT MORRIS UNIVERSITY: $3k → 11%OKLAHOMA STATE UNIVERSITY: $3k → 19%GRAND VALLEY STATE UNIVERSITY: $5k → 8%OAKLAND UNIVERSITY: $3k → 8%MACOMB COMMUNITY COLLEGE: $2k → 10%DAVENPORT UNIVERSITY: $3k → 11%SIENA HEIGHTS UNIVERSITY: $2k → 12%KALAMAZOO COLLEGE: $3k → 12%JACKSON COLLEGE: $14k → 13%GLEN OAKS COMMUNITY COLLEGE: $2k → 13%UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN: $8k → 14%ALBION COLLEGE: $3k → 14%HILLSDALE BEAUTY COLLEGE: $2k → 14%MONTCALM COMMUNITY COLLEGE: $3k → 15%BAKER COLLEGE: $2k → 16%SAGINAW VALLEY STATE UNIVERSITY: $2k → 18%CENTRAL MICHIGAN UNIVERSITY: $6k → 19%UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA: $3k → 17%TRINE UNIVERSITY: $4k → 9%GRAND VALLEY STATE UNIVERSITY: $3k → 8%JACKSON COLLEGE: $11k → 13%UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN: $5k → 14%MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY: $3k → 16%CENTRAL MICHIGAN UNIVERSITY: $5k → 19%TRINE UNIVERSITY: $3k → 9%GRAND VALLEY STATE UNIVERSITY: $3k → 8%KALAMAZOO VALLEY COMMUNITY COLLEGE: $5k → 12%JACKSON COLLEGE: $10k → 13%UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN: $5k → 14%CENTRAL MICHIGAN UNIVERSITY: $4k → 19%TRINE UNIVERSITY: $3k → 9%GRAND VALLEY STATE UNIVERSITY: $3k → 8%JACKSON COLLEGE: $8k → 13%UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN: $4k → 14%CENTRAL MICHIGAN UNIVERSITY: $3k → 19%GRAND VALLEY STATE UNIVERSITY: $2k → 8%JACKSON COLLEGE: $5k → 13%UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN: $3k → 14%CENTRAL MICHIGAN UNIVERSITY: $3k → 19%WESTERN MICHIGAN UNIVERSITY: $6k → 12%JACKSON COLLEGE: $4k → 13%EASTERN MICHIGAN UNIVERSITY: $3k → 14%CENTRAL MICHIGAN UNIVERSITY: $2k → 19%WESTERN MICHIGAN UNIVERSITY: $4k → 12%JACKSON COLLEGE: $4k → 13%WESTERN MICHIGAN UNIVERSITY: $4k → 12%WESTERN MICHIGAN UNIVERSITY: $3k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

MN
IL
MI
NY
IN
OH
PA
OK
AL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

93%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$240k · 24 repeat orgs$18k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +6% since the first grant, against +3% for the ones you funded once.

24 repeat relationships — 13 still active in FY2025, 11 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

24
11

Total granted

$240k
$16k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+6%
+3%

Still filing today

33%
27%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 92% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • UO
    University of Michigan
    7× · 2017–2025 · $27k · revenue +202%
  • TU
    Trine University
    3× · 2021–2023 · $10k · revenue +91%
  • DU
    DAVENPORT UNIVERSITY
    3× · 2023–2025 · $5k · revenue +6%

Funded once

  • MC
    MONTCALM COMMUNITY COLLEGE
    one grant, 2024 · $3k
  • MC
    MACOMB COMMUNITY COLLEGE
    one grant, 2020 · $2k
  • PM
    PAULL MITCHELL THE SCHOOL TOLEDO
    one grant, 2021 · $2k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Augustana University Association

Inspired by lutheran scholarly tradition and the liberal arts, augustana provides an education of enduring worth that challenges the intellect, fosters integrity and integrates faith with learning and service in a diverse world.

Education
2
Lehigh University

The university's goal in the coming decade is to advance learning through the integration of teaching, research and service to others. the core of this goal is to prepare graduates to engage with the world and lead lives of meaning. to do…

Education
3
Excelsior University

Excelsior University provides educational opportunity to adult learners with an emphasis on those historically underrepresented in higher education. The University meets students where they are - academically and geographically, offering…

Education
4
Ashland University

Ashland university, guided by our christian heritage, is a comprehensive, private university that provides a transformative learning experience, shaping graduates who work, serve and lead with integrity in their local, national, and global…

Education
5
Augustana College

Rooted in the liberal arts & sciences & lutheran expression of the christian faith, & is committed to offering a challenging education that develops qualities of mind, spirit, & body necessary for a rewarding life of leadership & service…

Education
6
Xavier University

Xavier is a jesuit catholic university rooted in the liberal arts tradition. our mission is to educate each student intellectually, morally, and spiritually. we create learning opportunities through rigorous academic and professional…

Education
7
Simpson College

Through innovative learning opportunities, individual student attention, and an unwavering commitment to inclusive educational access, simpson college cultivates a diverse community of learners to lead lives of meaning and purpose.

Education
8
Benedictine University

Benedictine University is an inclusive academic community dedicated to teaching and learning, scholarship and service, truth and justice, as inspired by the Catholic intellectual tradition, the social teaching of the Church, and the…

Education
9
Bradley University

Bradley university empowers students for immediate and sustained success in their personal and professional endeavors by combining professional preparation, liberal arts and sciences, and co-curricular experiences. alongside our dedication…

Education
10
Union University

Union university provides christ-centered education that promotes excellence and character development in service to church and society.

Education
11
Hilbert College

Hilbert college is an independent institution of higher learning that embraces its catholic franciscan heritage and values. students from diverse backgrounds are educated in liberal arts and professional programs to become informed…

Education
12
Wilson College

Wilson college empowers students to be confident and critical thinkers, creative visionaries, effective communicators, honorable leaders, and agents of justice.

Education

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Albion College and the most unlike its peers is Southern Illinois University Alumni Association. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 62 years old; the field is 17. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number20%5%<5yr13%5%5–10yr20%5%10–20yr15%10%20–35yr14%10%35–55yr18%65%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value20%4%<5yr13%2%5–10yr20%4%10–20yr15%4%20–35yr14%21%35–55yr18%65%55yr+

The field is 20% startups (under 5 years old) — 5% of your grantees by number, and just 4% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 5% lost their exemption, against 12% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
5%
1/22
the rest of the field
12%
6,510/53,834

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 38 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/13
Grantees still filing
8/13
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

JACKSON COLLEGE — $56,420 · OtherJACKSON COLLEGEUniversity of Michigan — $26,997 · OtherUniversity of MichiganCENTRAL MICHIGAN UNIVERSITY — $24,655 · OtherCENTRAL MICHIGAN UNIVERSITYWESTERN MICHIGAN UNIVERSITY — $22,565 · OtherWESTERN MICHIGAN UNIVERSITYGRAND VALLEY STATE UNIVERSITY — $16,128 · OtherGRAND VALLEY STATE UNIVERSITYKALAMAZOO VALLEY COMMUNITY COLLEGE — $8,300 · Other+21 more — $68,112 · Other+21 moreTrine University — $10,200 · EducationTrine UniversityALBION COLLEGE — $5,325 · EducationALBION COLLEGESOUTHERN ILLINOIS UNIVERSITY ALUMNI ASSOCIATION — $4,900 · EducationSOUTHERN ILLINOIS…DAVENPORT UNIVERSITY — $4,850 · EducationDAVENPORT UNIVERS…SIENA HEIGHTS UNIVERSITY — $3,627 · EducationSIENA HEIGHTS UNI…KALAMAZOO COLLEGE — $3,500 · EducationKALAMAZOO COLLEGEUNIVERSITY OF NORTHWESTERN OHIO — $3,400 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF NOR…HOPE COLLEGE — $1,475 · EducationADRIAN COLLEGE — $1,370 · Education+2 more — $2,100 · Education
Other$223,177Education$40,747

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetUniversity of Michigan — $26,997 over 7y, 2.5% of budgetTrine University — $10,200 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetALBION COLLEGE — $5,325 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSOUTHERN ILLINOIS UNIVERSITY ALUMNI ASSOCIATION — $4,900 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetDAVENPORT UNIVERSITY — $4,850 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSIENA HEIGHTS UNIVERSITY — $3,627 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetKALAMAZOO COLLEGE — $3,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetROBERT MORRIS UNIVERSITY — $3,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF NORTHWESTERN OHIO — $3,400 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHOPE COLLEGE — $1,475 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetADRIAN COLLEGE — $1,370 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBETHEL UNIVERSITY INC — $1,100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetALFRED UNIVERSITY — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds University of Michigan
  • Who funds Trine University
  • Who funds ALBION COLLEGE
  • Who funds SOUTHERN ILLINOIS UNIVERSITY ALUMNI ASSOCIATION
  • Who funds DAVENPORT UNIVERSITY
  • Who funds SIENA HEIGHTS UNIVERSITY
  • Who funds KALAMAZOO COLLEGE
  • Who funds ROBERT MORRIS UNIVERSITY
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF NORTHWESTERN OHIO
  • Who funds HOPE COLLEGE
  • Who funds ADRIAN COLLEGE
  • Who funds BETHEL UNIVERSITY INC
  • Who funds ALFRED UNIVERSITY

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Myer & Lois Franklin Charitable TrMI17.9× affinity6 shared granteesties to 5 of 5Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Myer & Lois Franklin Charitable Tr · Jp Crain Family Scholarship Pfdn Paulding County Area Foundation · Enterprise Holdings Foundation · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Lavere & Gladys Chase Scholarship Fd funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2025
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 38 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph