Skip to content

· Private foundation

Laura Pels International Foundation for Theater

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$385k
Granted FY2024still arriving
19
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$50k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Arts & Culture$4.3MEducation$256k
02FY2024 · 19 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • $10k–50k18 grants · $335k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $50k
$20,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$3.3M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ROUNDABOUT THEATRE COMPANY$50,000
LINCOLN CENTER THEATER$25,000
THE NEW GROUP INC$25,000
AANT (AMERICAN ASSOCIATES OF THE NATIONAL THEATRE)$25,000
AANT (AMERICAN ASSOCIATES OF THE NATIONAL THEATRE)$25,000
PLAYWRIGHTS HORIZONS$20,000
PEN AMERICA CENTER$20,000
BROOKLYN ACADEMY OF MUSIC$20,000
SIGNATURE THEATRE COMPANY INC$20,000
PEN AMERICA CENTER$20,000
SIGNATURE THEATRE COMPANY INC$20,000
PLAYWRIGHTS HORIZONS$20,000
ATLANTIC THEATER COMPANY$20,000
MANHATTAN THEATRE CLUB$15,000
MANHATTAN THEATRE CLUB$15,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 15%. 94% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 15%TGP THEATRE PHILLIPPE: $25k → 18%ATLANTIC THEATER COMPANY: $25k → 17%BROOKLYN ACADEMY OF MUSIC: $95k → 20%THE JOHN F KENNEDY CENTER FOR THE PERFORMING ARTS: $67k → 14%UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND DEVOS INSTITUTE: $25k → 11%ATLANTIC THEATER COMPANY: $25k → 17%BROOKLYN ACADEMY OF MUSIC: $50k → 20%THE JOHN F KENNEDY CENTER FOR THE PERFORMING ARTS: $61k → 14%ATLANTIC THEATER COMPANY: $25k → 17%BROOKLYN ACADEMY OF MUSIC: $27k → 20%THE JOHN F KENNEDY CENTER FOR THE PERFORMING ARTS: $50k → 14%BROOKLYN ACADEMY OF MUSIC: $25k → 20%UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND DEVOS INSTITUTE: $25k → 14%UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND DEVOS INSTITUTE: $25k → 14%UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND DEVOS INSTITUTE: $25k → 14%ROUNDABOUT THEATRE COMPANY: $2.0M → 17%ROUNDABOUT THEATRE COMPANY: $150k → 17%ROUNDABOUT THEATRE COMPANY: $100k → 17%ROUNDABOUT THEATRE COMPANY: $50k → 17%ROUNDABOUT THEATRE COMPANY: $50k → 17%ROUNDABOUT THEATRE COMPANY: $50k → 17%ROUNDABOUT THEATRE COMPANY: $50k → 17%ROUNDABOUT THEATRE COMPANY: $50k → 17%ROUNDABOUT THEATRE COMPANY: $34k → 17%FRENCH INSTITUTE ALLIANCE FRANCAISE: $25k → 17%FRENCH INSTITUTE ALLIANCE FRANCAISE: $25k → 17%FRENCH INSTITUTE ALLIANCE FRANCAISE: $25k → 17%LINCOLN CENTER THEATER: $51k → 17%LINCOLN CENTER THEATER: $30k → 17%THE NEW GROUP: $25k → 17%THE VIVIAN BEAUMONT THEATER INC: $25k → 17%LINCOLN CENTER THEATER: $25k → 17%THE NEW GROUP: $25k → 17%AMERICAN ASSOCIATES OF THE NATIONAL THEATRE: $25k → 17%THE NEW GROUP INC: $25k → 17%AMERICAN ASSOCIATES OF THE NATIONAL THEATRE: $25k → 17%AANT (AMERICAN ASSOCIATES OF THE NATIONAL THEATRE): $25k → 17%AMERICAN ASSOCIATES OF THE NATIONAL THEATRE: $25k → 17%THE PUBLIC THEATER COMPANY: $25k → 17%AANT (AMERICAN ASSOCIATES OF THE NATIONAL THEATRE): $25k → 17%MANHATTAN THEATRE CLUB: $50k → 17%MANHATTAN THEATRE CLUB: $50k → 17%SIGNATURE THEATRE COMPANY INC: $50k → 17%SIGNATURE THEATRE: $30k → 17%MANHATTAN THEATRE CLUB: $25k → 17%NEW YORK UNIVERSITY TISCH SCHOOL OF THE ARTS: $25k → 17%SIGNATURE THEATRE: $25k → 17%PLAYWRIGHTS HORIZONS: $25k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 8% of Laura Pels International Foundation for Theater’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 93% of the giving stays in NY; by stated purpose, 80%.

Laura Pels International Foundation for Theaterlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 9.8% directed abroad (not shown)
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$4.5M · 16 repeat orgs$81k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +51% since the first grant, against -7% for those funded once.

16 repeat relationships: 12 still active in FY2024, 4 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

16
5

Total granted

$4.5M
$81k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+51%
-7%

Still filing today

88%
20%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Arts & CultureEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • JF
    JOHN F KENNEDY CENTER FOR THE PERFORMING ARTS
    3× · 2017–2019 · $178k · revenue +115%
  • PH
    PLAYWRIGHTS HORIZONS INC
    6× · 2017–2024 · $166k · revenue +21%
  • MT
    MANHATTAN THEATRE CLUB INC
    5× · 2017–2024 · $165k · revenue +35%

Funded once

  • TP
    THE PUBLIC THEATER COMPANY
    one grant, 2023 · $25k
  • TT
    TGP THEATRE PHILLIPPE
    one grant, 2023 · $25k
  • TG
    THE GORILLA REPERTORY THEATER COMPANY
    one grant, 2023 · $20k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Royal National Theatre

Theatre can lead to extraordinary moments of shared imagination. it enables us to stand in anothers shoes to better understand ourselves and the world around us. it shows us who we are, who we have been, who we could be. the nt delivers on…

Arts & Culture
2
Women's Project & Productions Inc

Wp theater is the nation's oldest and largest theater company dedicated to developing, producing, and promoting the work of women+ at every stage of their careers. for over four decades we have served as leaders of a global movement…

Arts & Culture
3
Transport Group Inc Dba Transport Group Theatre Company

Producing and developing plays and musicals.

Arts & Culture
4
New York Shakespeare Festival

As the nation's foremost producer of shakespeare and new work, the public theater is dedicated to achieving artistic excellence while developing an american theater that is accessible and relevant to all people through productions of…

Arts & Culture
5
Susan Smith Blackburn Prize Inc
—
6
Berkeley Repertory Theatre

Please see schedule o for the complete mission statement.berkeley repertory theatre creates ambitious theatre that entertains and challenges its audiences, provokes civic engagement, and inspires people to experience the world in new and…

Arts & Culture
7
Theatre for a New Audience Inc

The mission of theatre for a new audience is to develop and vitalize the performance and study of shakespeare and classic drama. the theatre is dedicated to the language and ideas of writers - to a dialogue over centuries between…

Arts & Culture
8
The Russian Arts Theatre and Studio

Develop recognition of international theater

Arts & Culture
9
Spanish Theatre Repertory Company Ltd

To present, in a rotating repertory, the finest latin american, spanish, and latino usa theatre and to serve as a catalyst for cultural exchange between spanish and english speaking americans.

Arts & Culture
10
Origin Theatre Company Inc

To discover, cultivate and develop emerging european writers and artists by staging their works in new york city theatre.

Arts & Culture
11
The Center for International Theatre Development
Arts & Culture
12
Titan Productions Incorporated

Titan theatre company is committed to breathing new life and clarity into classical works of theatre, exploring new and contemporary language plays, and delivering adventurous and visceral theatrical experiences for our audiences and…

Arts & Culture
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Playwrights Horizons Inc; the most unlike its peers is New York University. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

15 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 15 of the 21 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
15/15
Grantees still filing
12/15
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ROUNDABOUT THEATRE COMPANY INC: $2,533,800 · Arts & CultureROUNDABOUT THEATRE COMPANY INCJOHN F KENNEDY CENTER FOR THE PERFORMING ARTS: $178,212 · Arts & CulturePLAYWRIGHTS HORIZONS INC: $165,500 · Arts & CultureMANHATTAN THEATRE CLUB INC: $165,000 · Arts & CultureTHE VIVIAN BEAUMONT THEATERINC D/B/A LINCOLN CENTER THEATER: $146,110 · Arts & CultureATLANTIC THEATER COMPANY: $137,500 · Arts & CultureNATIONAL THEATRE IN AMERICA INC: $135,000 · Arts & Culture+5 more: $415,700 · Arts & Culture+5 moreBROOKLYN ACADEMY OF MUSIC INC: $251,840 · OtherBROOKLYN ACA…UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND DEVOS INSTITUTE: $100,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY O…SIGNATURE THEATRE: $85,000 · OtherSIGNATURE TH…THE PUBLIC THEATER COMPANY: $25,000 · OtherTGP THEATRE PHILLIPPE: $25,000 · OtherTHE GORILLA REPERTORY THEATER COMPANY: $20,000 · Other+1 more: $1,000 · OtherJUILLIARD SCHOOL: $80,000 · EducationNew York University: $75,000 · Education
Arts & Culture$3,876,822Other$507,840Education$155,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetROUNDABOUT THEATRE COMPANY INC: $2,533,800 over 7y, 3.1% of budgetBROOKLYN ACADEMY OF MUSIC INC: $251,840 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetJOHN F KENNEDY CENTER FOR THE PERFORMING ARTS: $178,212 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetPLAYWRIGHTS HORIZONS INC: $165,500 over 6y, 0.4% of budgetMANHATTAN THEATRE CLUB INC: $165,000 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetTHE VIVIAN BEAUMONT THEATERINC D/B/A LINCOLN CENTER THEATER: $146,110 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetATLANTIC THEATER COMPANY: $137,500 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetNATIONAL THEATRE IN AMERICA INC: $135,000 over 5y, 1.3% of budgetPEN AMERICAN CENTER INC: $120,000 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetTHE NEW GROUP INC: $110,700 over 5y, 1.1% of budgetSIGNATURE THEATRE COMPANY INC: $90,000 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetFRENCH INSTITUTE - ALLIANCE FRANCAISE: $85,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetJUILLIARD SCHOOL: $80,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetNew York University: $75,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetPHILADELPHIA THEATRE COMPANY: $10,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds ROUNDABOUT THEATRE COMPANY INC ↗
  • Who funds BROOKLYN ACADEMY OF MUSIC INC ↗
  • Who funds JOHN F KENNEDY CENTER FOR THE PERFORMING ARTS ↗
  • Who funds PLAYWRIGHTS HORIZONS INC ↗
  • Who funds MANHATTAN THEATRE CLUB INC ↗
  • Who funds THE VIVIAN BEAUMONT THEATERINC D/B/A LINCOLN CENTER THEATER ↗
  • Who funds ATLANTIC THEATER COMPANY ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL THEATRE IN AMERICA INC ↗
  • Who funds PEN AMERICAN CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds THE NEW GROUP INC ↗
  • Who funds SIGNATURE THEATRE COMPANY INC ↗
  • Who funds FRENCH INSTITUTE - ALLIANCE FRANCAISE ↗
  • Who funds JUILLIARD SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds New York University ↗
  • Who funds PHILADELPHIA THEATRE COMPANY ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust IncIN11× affinity4 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Laura Pels International Foundation for Theater funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Laura Pels International Foundation for Theater. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Laura Pels International Foundation for Theater?

    Find your warmest path to Laura Pels International Foundation for Theater through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 21 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Laura Pels International Foundation for Theater’s filings →

    More from the funding graph