Skip to content

· Private foundation

Larue Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$44k
Granted FY2025still arriving
6
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Health$83kArts & Culture$70kHuman Services$50kPhilanthropy$50kFood & Nutrition$2k
02FY2025 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k3 grants · $14k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $30k
$10,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$619k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
NEW HOPE CHARITIES$10,000
PROVIDENCE HOUSE$10,000
FRIENDS OF THE UFFIZI GALLERY INC$10,000
HOSPICE OF PALM BEACH COUNTY FDN$6,500
HOSPICE OF WESTERN RESERVE$6,500
GREATER CLEVELAND FOOD BANK$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–25, $60k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%HOSPICE OF PALM BEACH COUNTY FDN: $10k → 11%HOSPICE OF PALM BEACH COUNTY FDN: $7k → 11%HOSPICE OF PALM BEACH COUNTY: $6k → 11%HOSPICE OF PALM BEACH COUNTY FDN: $6k → 11%HOSPICE OF THE WESTERN RESERVE: $6k → 17%HOSPICE OF PALM BEACH COUNTY FDN: $6k → 11%HOSPICE OF THE WESTERN RESERVE: $6k → 17%HOSPICE OF THE WESTERN RESERVE: $6k → 17%HOSPICE OF PALM BEACH COUNTY: $6k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

96%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$245k · 9 repeat orgs$10k to everyone else

9 repeat relationships: 6 still active in FY2025, 3 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

9
1

Total granted

$245k
$10k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+21%
+146%

Still filing today

78%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesArts & CulturePhilanthropyFood & NutritionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • NH
    NEW HOPE CHARITIES INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $50k · revenue +16%
  • PH
    PROVIDENCE HOUSE INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $50k · revenue +28%
  • TF
    TrustBridge Foundation Inc
    4× · 2020–2025 · $29k · revenue +258%

Funded once

  • CB
    CLEVELAND BALLETgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $10k · revenue +146%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Hospice & Palliative Care of the Ohio Valley Inc

Helping individuals live with dignity through the final stage of life.

Human Services
2
TrustBridge Inc

Trustbridge, inc. is organized & operated exclusively for the purpose of providing management, administrative, & other support services to its supported organizations: hospice of palm beach county, inc., hospice by the sea inc. and…

Human Services
3
Hospice of Medina County

Hospice of medina county provides palliative end-of-life care, caregiver support, and bereavement services throughout northern ohio. in celebration of the individual worth of each life, we strive to relieve suffering, enhance comfort,…

—
4
Hospice of the Florida Keys Inc

To enable individuals to remain in their homes by supporting compassionate, effective, life-enhancing health and supportive services. at this time, hfk care corporation is inactive.

Human Services
5
Columbus Hospice Inc

Care of the terminally ill

—
6
Stein Hospice Service Inc

Hospice of the western reserve provides palliative end-of-life care, caregiver support, and bereavement services throughout northern ohio. in celebration of the individual worth of each life, we strive to relieve suffering, enhance…

Human Services
7
Lifecare Hospice

The mission of hospice is to provide medical care, nursing care, pain relief, and emotional and spiritual support services to terminally ill patients and their families.

—
8
The Hospice of the Florida Suncoast Inc

Suncoast hospice's mission is to be the center to improve life for those touched by advanced illness, death, dying, grief, bereavement and other end-of-life issues.

Human Services
9
Hospice of Central Ohio

Patients of hospice of central ohio receive compassionate, individualized end-of-life care. their desires guide the physical, emotional, and spiritual care support we provide. members of our community, patient's families, children, and…

—
10
Hospice & Palliative Care Charlotte Region

Our mission is to relieve suffering and improve the quality and dignity of life through compassionate hospice care at the end of life, palliative care for those with advanced illness, and through community education.

Human Services
11
Miami Valley Hospital Foundation

Enhance the patient and family experience at miami valley hospital by raising community support for cutting-edge programs and services which help build healthy communities.

Health
12
Christian Care Retirement Apartments Inc

Through christian love and excellence, we are dedicated to providing a fulfilling lifestyle and promoting independence to those we serve

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is TrustBridge Foundation Inc; the most unlike its peers is Friends of the Uffizi Gallery. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 10 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
6/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

PROVIDENCE HOUSE INC: $50,000 · OtherPROVIDENCE HOUSE INCHOSPICE OF WESTERN RESERVE: $22,750 · OtherHOSPICE OF WESTERN RESERVETHE FRIENDS OF UFFIZI GALLERY INC: $20,000 · OtherTHE FRIENDS OF UFFIZI GALLERY INCTrustBridge Foundation Inc: $29,000 · Human ServicesTrustBridge Foundation IncHOSPICE OF THE WESTERN RESERVE INC: $18,750 · Human ServicesHOSPICE OF THE WESTERN RES…Hospice of Palm Beach County Inc: $12,500 · Human ServicesHospice of Palm Beach Coun…NEW HOPE CHARITIES INC: $50,000 · PhilanthropyNEW HOPE CHARITIES INCFRIENDS OF THE UFFIZI GALLERY: $40,000 · Arts & CultureFRIENDS OF THE UFFIZI …CLEVELAND BALLET: $10,000 · Arts & CultureCLEVELAND BALLETGREATER CLEVELAND FOOD BANK INC: $2,000 · Food & Nutrition
Other$92,750Human Services$60,250Philanthropy$50,000Arts & Culture$50,000Food & Nutrition$2,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetNEW HOPE CHARITIES INC: $50,000 over 6y, 0.8% of budgetPROVIDENCE HOUSE INC: $50,000 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE UFFIZI GALLERY: $40,000 over 4y, 3.8% of budgetTrustBridge Foundation Inc: $29,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetHOSPICE OF THE WESTERN RESERVE INC: $18,750 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetHospice of Palm Beach County Inc: $12,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCLEVELAND BALLET: $10,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetGREATER CLEVELAND FOOD BANK INC: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Donor Advised Charitable Giving IncCO7.5× affinity5 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Larue Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Larue Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 30%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • New Hope Charities Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
3get no government money at all
3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Larue Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Larue Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 10 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Larue’s filings →

More from the funding graph