Skip to content

· Private foundation

Larrymore Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$44k
Granted FY2025still arriving
10
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$20k
Largest
01What it funds
0188% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Human Services$91kReligion$21kPhilanthropy$15kInternational$7kHealth$6kArts & Culture$500Food & Nutrition$304Education$250Other$0
02FY2025 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k8 grants · $9k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $35k
$1,725
Median grant
4
States reached
$400k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
BOCA WEST CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION$20,100
JAFCO$15,000
OHEF SHOLOM TEMPLE$2,926
FRIENDS OF THE ISREAL DEFENCE FORCES$2,000
JEWISH FEDERATION OF SOUTH PALM BEACH COUNTY$1,725
TEMPLE BETH EL OF BOCA RATON$1,065
NATIONAL BASEBALL HALL OF FAME AND MUSEUM$500
FRIENDS OF JCC KRAKOW$500
ADOLPH & ROSE LEVIS JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER$300
SAINT JUDE CHILDREN RESEARCH HOSPITAL$32
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY22–25, $76k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%BOCA WEST CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION: $25k → 11%BOCA WEST CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION: $20k → 11%BOCA WEST CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION: $20k → 11%BOCA WEST CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION: $10k → 11%BETH SHOLOM HOME OF EASTERN VIRGINIA: $25 → 10%ADOLPH & ROSE LEVIS JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER: $300 → 11%BETH SHOLOM HOME OF EASTERN VIRGINIA: $125 → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NY
OR
NJ
CA
VA
TN
NC
DC
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

80%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$101k · 6 repeat orgs$25k to everyone else

6 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2025, 2 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

6
22

Total granted

$101k
$7k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+17%
+31%

Still filing today

33%
23%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 59% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $17k went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesHealthArts & CultureReligionFood & NutritionPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • BW
    BOCA WEST CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION FKA BOCA WEST COMMUNITY CHARITABLE FOUNDATION
    4× · 2022–2025 · $76k · revenue +17%
  • OS
    OHEF SHOLOM TEMPLE
    5× · 2021–2025 · $18k
  • FO
    FRIENDS OF THE ISREAL DEFENCE FORCES
    2× · 2024–2025 · $7k

Funded once

  • DR
    DAMON RUNYON FUND CANCER RESEARCH
    one grant, 2022 · $5k
  • FO
    FRIENDS OF BETH SHOLOM (BETH SHOLOM HOME)
    one grant, 2022 · $1k
  • BC
    BROADWAY CARESEQUITY FIGHTS AIDS INCgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $500 · revenue +31%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Chelsea Jewish Lifecare Inc

The organization's mission is to manage a continuum of senior care business lines that consistently provide high-quality compassionate care while focusing on the development of innovative programs and services that enable individuals to…

Health
2
Chelsea Jewish Nursing Home Inc

The organization's mission is to provide individuals throughout the greater boston area with the highest level of skilled nursing, rehabilitation and assisted living services without regard to ability to pay. the goal is to ensure both…

Health
3
Chelsea Jewish Green House Inc

The organization's mission is to provide individuals and families throughout the greater boston area with the highest level of skilled nursing and rehabilitation, and assisted living care without regard to ability to pay. the goal is to…

Health
4
Chelsea Jewish North Shore Assisted Living Inc

To enrich the life of each of our residents and program participants so that each may continue to live his or her life with a sense of meaning and purpose. we provide assisted living units for our tenants.

Housing & Shelter
5
Chelsea Jewish Community Inc

The organization's mission is to provide the highest level of home health and hospice care services without regard of an individual's ability to pay.

Health
6
Jgs Lifecare Corporation

Non-profit organization dedicated to improving the physical, spiritual and emotional health of individuals and families.

Health
7
Long Island Jewish Medical Center

Long island jewish medical center is part of the northwell health ("northwell"), which strives to improve the health of the communities it serves and is committed to providing the highest quality clinical care; educating the current and…

Health
8
Chelsea Jewish Charitable Foundation Inc

The organization's mission is to engage in fundraising activities and provide support services to sponsor related non-profit entities which are engaged to enrich the life of each of their residents and program participants, so that each…

Health
9
Jewish Nursing Home of Western Massachusetts Inc

To care for the frail, elderly and infirmed according to jewish traditions.

Human Services
10
Jewish Federation of Southern New Jersey

The jewish federation of southern new jersey cares for those in need, enhances jewish life and ensures the continuity of a vibrant jewish community locally, in israel and around the world.

Philanthropy
11
National Jewish Health

National Jewish Health's mission since 1899 is to heal, discover and educate as a preeminent healthcare institution. We serve by providing the best integrated and innovative care for patients and their families; by understanding and…

Health
12
Jgs Administrative Services Inc

To provide administrative support to jgs lifecare corporation.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is United Jewish Federation of Tidewater; the most unlike its peers is American Heart Association Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 35 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/12
Grantees still filing
8/12
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

BOCA WEST CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION FKA BOCA WEST COMMUNITY CHARITABLE FOUNDATION: $75,500 · Human ServicesBOCA WEST CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION FKA BOCA WEST COMMUNITY CHARI…+2 more: $450 · Human ServicesOHEF SHOLOM TEMPLE: $17,854 · OtherOHEF SHOLOM TEMPLEJAFCO: $15,000 · OtherJAFCOFRIENDS OF THE ISREAL DEFENCE FORCES: $7,000 · OtherFRIENDS OF THE ISREAL DEFENCE FORCESDAMON RUNYON FUND CANCER RESEARCH: $4,500 · OtherDAMON RUNYON FUND CANCER RESEARCH+20 more: $3,944 · Other+20 moreUNITED JEWISH FEDERATION OF TIDEWATER: $10,298 · PhilanthropyUNITED JEWIS…JEWISH FEDERATION OF SOUTH PALM BEACH COUNTY INC: $4,725 · PhilanthropyJEWISH FEDER…+1 more: $100 · PhilanthropyNATIONAL BASEBALL HALL OF FAME AND MUSEUM INC: $500 · Arts & CultureFRIENDS OF JCC KRAKOW INC: $500 · ReligionFOODBANK OF SOUTHEASTERN VIRGINIA: $104 · Food & NutritionAmerican Heart Association Inc: $53 · HealthBENJAMIN GOLDBERG FOUNDATION: $52 · Youth Development
Human Services$75,950Other$48,298Philanthropy$15,123Arts & Culture$500Religion$500Food & Nutrition$104Health$53Youth Development$52

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetBOCA WEST CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION FKA BOCA WEST COMMUNITY CHARITABLE FOUNDATION: $75,500 over 4y, 1.3% of budgetUNITED JEWISH FEDERATION OF TIDEWATER: $10,298 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetJEWISH FEDERATION OF SOUTH PALM BEACH COUNTY INC: $4,725 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBROADWAY CARESEQUITY FIGHTS AIDS INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBeth Sholom Home of Eastern Virginia: $150 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFOODBANK OF SOUTHEASTERN VIRGINIA: $104 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetST BALDRICK'S FOUNDATION INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc: $53 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBENJAMIN GOLDBERG FOUNDATION: $52 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds BOCA WEST CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION FKA BOCA WEST COMMUNITY CHARITABLE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds UNITED JEWISH FEDERATION OF TIDEWATER ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH FEDERATION OF SOUTH PALM BEACH COUNTY INC ↗
  • Who funds BROADWAY CARESEQUITY FIGHTS AIDS INC ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL BASEBALL HALL OF FAME AND MUSEUM INC ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF JCC KRAKOW INC ↗
  • Who funds ADOLPH & ROSE LEVIS JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds Beth Sholom Home of Eastern Virginia ↗
  • Who funds FOODBANK OF SOUTHEASTERN VIRGINIA ↗
  • Who funds ST BALDRICK'S FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds American Heart Association Inc ↗
  • Who funds BENJAMIN GOLDBERG FOUNDATION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Donor Advised Charitable Giving IncCO5.8× affinity5 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Larrymore Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Larrymore Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 30%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    3get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Larrymore Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Larrymore Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 35 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Larrymore’s filings →

    More from the funding graph