· Private foundation
Larry Paul Fleschner Charitable Foundation
Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).
A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 58% of Larry Paul Fleschner Charitable Foundation’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k3 grants · $8k
- $10k–50k6 grants · $128k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| Individual grant recipient | $35,400 |
| Chances & Services for Youth | $35,000 |
| Pride Center of Terre Haute | $17,500 |
| Vigo County Educational Foundation | $15,000 |
| Susie's Place | $15,000 |
| Mission Doctors Association | $10,000 |
| The Seeing Eye | $5,000 |
| Sorensen Magnet School of the Arts & Humanities | $1,500 |
| Coeur d'Alene Library | $1,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your US giving — 88% of grant dollars ($671k). The need read here covers only this US portion; the 12% that went abroad ($93k) is mapped below.
Your human-services grants (FY21–25, $81k) land where the poverty rate runs at 18%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 94% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Beyond the US — 12% of all-years giving ($93k)
1 country, by the recipient’s country on the filing.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving. International giving is mapped by the recipient’s country from the same 990 filings; comparable need data isn’t available at that grain.
Where the work is directed
The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.
About 14% of Larry Paul Fleschner Charitable Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another. Read by recipient address, 78% of the giving stays in IN; read by stated purpose it is 66% — less of the work is directed home than the recipients' locations suggest.
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +49% since the first grant, against +20% for the ones you funded once.
14 repeat relationships — 5 still active in FY2025, 9 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 65% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $48k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
The Hendricks County Child Advocacy Center Inc6× · 2020–2025 · $93k · revenue +47%- TMTHE MAPLE CENTER INC5× · 2020–2024 · $92k · revenue +28% · 41% of their budget
- PCPride Center of Terre Haute Inc5× · 2021–2025 · $63k · revenue +568% · 61% of their budget
Funded once
- IGIndividual grant recipientone grant, 2024 · $25k
- RMRonald McDonald Houseone grant, 2020 · $23k
- ASArt Spaces Incone grant, 2022 · $10k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The mission of Terre Haute Catholic Charities Foodbank is to feed the hungry in Clay, Greene, Knox, Parke, Sullivan, Vermillion and Vigo counties through a network of emergency food distribution member agencies and engage our community in…
The staff and volunteers of Catholic Charities Indianapolis are called by the Gospel to uphold the dignity of all people. Guided by Catholic social teaching, we consider it a privilege to deliver compassionate and caring service to help…
The mission of the Terre Haute Chamber of Commerce is to preserve, protect, and promote a business friendly envrionment free of obstacles to growth and development.
Catholic Charities Bloomington is committed to enhancing the availability of quality mental health services in the communities it serves. We do this through the delivery of professional mental health education and counseling on a sliding…
Provide adoption, counseling services, and refugee assistance
Child advocacy organization that focuses on the prevention of child sexual abuse and youth suicide.
Catholic Charities of Archdiocese of Indianapolis, Inc strives to live the gospel by embodying the compassion of Christ and exercising leadership in: advocating policies and action that protect human life and dignity, promoting awareness…
To provide for the humane treatment of animals in clinton county, indiana
Education & Museum Operations
Services to victims of child abuse.
The Julian Center provides emergency shelter, counseling, and outreach advocacy for victims of domestic violence, sexual assault, and rape.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Seeing Eye Inc and the most unlike its peers is Mission Doctors Association. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 25 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds The Hendricks County Child Advocacy Center Inc ↗
- Who funds THE MAPLE CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds Pride Center of Terre Haute Inc ↗
- Who funds CHANCES AND SERVICES FOR YOUTH INC ↗
- Who funds Catholic Charities Terre Haute Inc ↗
- Who funds THE SEEING EYE INC ↗
- Who funds COUNCIL ON DOMESTIC ABUSE INC ↗
- Who funds TERRE HAUTE WOMEN'S CLUB INC ↗
- Who funds TERRE HAUTE HUMANE SOCIETY INC ↗
- Who funds Mission Doctors Association ↗
- Who funds CANDLES ↗
- Who funds Indiana State University Foundation Inc ↗
- Who funds WABASH VALLEY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds Eastside Christian Academy Inc ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Wabash Valley Community Foundation Inc · Max L Gibson & Jacqueline Gibson Foundation · Gregory L Gibson Charitable Foundation Inc · Duke Energy Foundation · Frederick R Benson Trust · The George F and Marion D Johnson Charitable Trust · Clara Fairbanks Foundation Inc · Round Room Gives Inc · Lilly Endowment Inc · Hollie & Anna Oakley Foundation Inc · United Way of the Wabash Valley Inc · Thompson Thrift Foundation Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Larry Paul Fleschner Charitable Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.