Skip to content

· Private foundation

Larry L and Michele M Murphy Charitable Trust

Its FY2026 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$190k
Granted FY2026still arriving
8
Grants FY2026still arriving
1
States reached
$45k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2021 to 2025.

Human Services$265kHealth$160kEnvironment$89kHousing & Shelter$50kFood & Nutrition$48k
02FY2026 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2026

  • Under $10k3 grants · $15k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $175k
$35,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$2.3M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
FORWARD PATHS FOUNDATION$45,000
DUVALL HOMES$41,250
SUNRISE ARC$38,750
NEW BEGINNINGS OF CENTRAL FLORIDA$35,000
TROUT LAKE NATURE CENTER$15,000
THE SOCIETY OF SAINT VINCENT DE PAU$5,000
THE CHRISTIAN CARE CENTER$5,000
LEESBURG FOOD BANK$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY22–26, $420k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 47% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 10%DUVALL HOMES: $50k → 12%DUVALL HOMES: $41k → 12%DUVALL HOMES: $40k → 12%DUVALL HOMES: $40k → 12%DUVALL HOMES: $25k → 12%THE CHRISTIAN CARE CENTER: $5k → 10%THE CHRISTIAN CARE CENTER: $5k → 10%THE CHRISTIAN CARE CENTER: $5k → 10%THE CHRISTIAN CARE CENTER: $5k → 10%THE CHRISTIAN CARE CENTER: $5k → 10%SUNRISE ARC: $45k → 10%SUNRISE ARC: $45k → 10%SUNRISE ARC: $45k → 10%SUNRISE ARC: $39k → 10%SUNRISE ARC: $25k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

100%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$802k · 9 repeat orgs$0 to everyone else

9 repeat relationships: 8 still active in FY2026, 1 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

9
0

Total granted

$802k
$0

Still filing today

78%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2026, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23’24’25’26
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22’23’24’25’26
Human ServicesEnvironmentYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SI
    SUNRISEARC INC
    5× · 2022–2026 · $199k · revenue +11%
  • DH
    DUVALL HOMES INC
    5× · 2022–2026 · $196k · revenue +10%
  • TL
    TROUT LAKE NATURE CENTER INC
    5× · 2022–2026 · $104k · revenue +275%

Funded once

    How this is measured

    Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

    04Its field

    Closest unfunded matches

    The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

    1
    Brighter Day Recovery Inc

    assisting in transforming lives

    —
    2
    The Arc Tampa Bay Inc

    The mission of the arc tampa bay, inc. is to support and empower people with intellectual and developmental disabilities.

    —
    3
    New Beginnings Youth Homes Inc

    We provide two, six bedroom, teaching-style homes for at-risk people in Pinellas County. Originally built singularly for aging out at-risk youth, the vision and usage has broadened to domestic violence victims, single moms with kids,…

    —
    4
    The Remnant House

    The remnant house, located in lee county, mississippi provides men and women with a faith-based christian transitional living home and recovery program. our christ-centered one year transitional living recovery program allows an individual…

    Health
    5
    Deedco Gardens Inc

    To provide low income housing to elderly families in homestead, florida.

    Housing & Shelter
    6
    Noahs House

    The organization provides opportunities for growth, independence, and fulfillment for adults with intellectual and developmental disabilities by offering a loving, nurturing, and affordable residential community, along with structured…

    Housing & Shelter
    7
    Central Florida Childrens Home

    To provide homes for disadvantaged children.

    Human Services
    8
    Pathways to Care Inc

    Pathways to care is dedicated to providing health, housing and hope to central floridas homeless.

    Health
    9
    Kathleen Anderson Comprehensive Work Center Inc

    Inspire of central florida trains uniquely-abled individuals in life skills, social skills, and continuing education. our organization serves individuals with disabilities 18 years and older.

    Employment
    10
    Bryant Homes Inc

    Transitional Living Services for ex-offe

    —
    11
    Fulfillment House Inc
    Health
    12
    Bridging Lives Inc Bridging Lives Inc

    The organization provides residential group care for children that are adjudicated dependent to the state of florida foster care system.

    Human Services
    How this is measured
    The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Sunrisearc Inc; the most unlike its peers is Leesburg Food Bank Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
    04the grantee network

    8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

    Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

    How this is measured

    Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 9 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

    Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

    0
    Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
    1
    Early backer (in before they grew)
    7/8
    Grantees still filing
    6/8
    Grew since first funded

    Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

    SUNRISEARC INC: $198,750 · Human ServicesSUNRISEARC INCDUVALL HOMES INC: $196,250 · Human ServicesDUVALL HOMES INCChristian Care Center Inc: $25,000 · Human ServicesChristian Care Center IncNEW BEGINNINGS OF CENTRAL FLORIDA INC: $102,500 · OtherNEW BEGINNINGS OF CENTRAL…LEESBURG FOOD BANK INC: $30,000 · OtherLEESBURG FOOD BANK INCTHE SOCIETY OF SAINT VINCENT DE PAU: $28,000 · OtherTHE SOCIETY OF SAINT VINC…SCARC INC: $22,000 · OtherSCARC INCTROUT LAKE NATURE CENTER INC: $104,450 · EnvironmentTROUT LAKE NAT…FORWARD PATHS FOUNDATION INC: $95,000 · Youth DevelopmentFORWARD PATHS…
    Human Services$420,000Other$182,500Environment$104,450Youth Development$95,000

    Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

    25%50%75%100%$1.0Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSUNRISEARC INC: $198,750 over 5y, 0.9% of budgetDUVALL HOMES INC: $196,250 over 5y, 0.7% of budgetTROUT LAKE NATURE CENTER INC: $104,450 over 5y, 8.4% of budgetNEW BEGINNINGS OF CENTRAL FLORIDA INC: $102,500 over 5y, 1.8% of budgetFORWARD PATHS FOUNDATION INC: $95,000 over 5y, 1.4% of budgetLEESBURG FOOD BANK INC: $30,000 over 5y, 3.7% of budgetChristian Care Center Inc: $25,000 over 5y, 0.3% of budget
    Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

    A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

    • Who funds SUNRISEARC INC ↗
    • Who funds DUVALL HOMES INC ↗
    • Who funds TROUT LAKE NATURE CENTER INC ↗
    • Who funds NEW BEGINNINGS OF CENTRAL FLORIDA INC ↗
    • Who funds FORWARD PATHS FOUNDATION INC ↗
    • Who funds LEESBURG FOOD BANK INC ↗
    • Who funds Christian Care Center Inc ↗
    • Who funds SCARC INC ↗

    Co-funders

    Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

    William M and Marian R Haywood Charitable TrustFL17.9× affinity6 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

    Open a dossier: William M and Marian R Haywood Charitable Trust · Amazonsmile Foundation

    How this is measured
    Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

    How much its grantees rely on government

    Each dot is one organization Larry L and Michele M Murphy Charitable Trust funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Larry L and Michele M Murphy Charitable Trust. Bigger dots raise more.

    2025
    ’20’21’22’23’24’25
    no gov · 50%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
    • Christian Care Center Inc: 0% of income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    5get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Larry L and Michele M Murphy Charitable Trust?

    Find your warmest path to Larry L and Michele M Murphy Charitable Trust through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 9 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2026, released 2026. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Larry L and Michele M Murphy’s filings →

    More from the funding graph