Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Larry L and Michele M Murphy Charitable Trust

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$155k
Granted FY2025still arriving
9
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$50k
Largest
01What you fund
0178% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY20212025.

Human Services$335kEnvironment$89kYouth Development$50kOther$138k
02FY2025 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k4 grants · $20k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $85k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $50k
$10,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$2.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
DUVALL HOMES$50,000
SUNRISE ARC$45,000
NEW BEGINNINGS OF CENTRAL FLORIDA$15,000
TROUT LAKE NATURE CENTER$15,000
FORWARD PATHS FOUNDATION$10,000
THE CHRISTIAN CARE CENTER$5,000
SCARC INC$5,000
THE SOCIETY OF SAINT VINCENT DE PAU$5,000
LEESBURG FOOD BANK$5,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY22–25, $335k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 46% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 10%DUVALL HOMES: $50k → 12%DUVALL HOMES: $40k → 12%DUVALL HOMES: $40k → 12%DUVALL HOMES: $25k → 12%THE CHRISTIAN CARE CENTER: $5k → 10%THE CHRISTIAN CARE CENTER: $5k → 10%THE CHRISTIAN CARE CENTER: $5k → 10%THE CHRISTIAN CARE CENTER: $5k → 10%SUNRISE ARC: $45k → 10%SUNRISE ARC: $45k → 10%SUNRISE ARC: $45k → 10%SUNRISE ARC: $25k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

100%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$612k · 9 repeat orgs$0 to everyone else

9 repeat relationships — 9 still active in FY2025, 0 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

9
0

Total granted

$612k
$0

Still filing today

78%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesEnvironmentYouth DevelopmentOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SI
    SUNRISEARC INC
    4× · 2022–2025 · $160k · revenue +11%
  • DH
    DUVALL HOMES INC
    4× · 2022–2025 · $155k · revenue +10%
  • TL
    TROUT LAKE NATURE CENTER INC
    4× · 2022–2025 · $89k · revenue +275%

Funded once

    Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

    04Your field

    The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

    1
    Brighter Day Recovery Inc

    assisting in transforming lives

    2
    The Arc Tampa Bay Inc

    The mission of the arc tampa bay, inc. is to support and empower people with intellectual and developmental disabilities.

    3
    The Remnant House

    The remnant house, located in lee county, mississippi provides men and women with a faith-based christian transitional living home and recovery program. our christ-centered one year transitional living recovery program allows an individual…

    Health
    4
    New Beginnings Youth Homes Inc

    We provide two, six bedroom, teaching-style homes for at-risk people in Pinellas County. Originally built singularly for aging out at-risk youth, the vision and usage has broadened to domestic violence victims, single moms with kids,…

    5
    Noahs House

    The organization provides opportunities for growth, independence, and fulfillment for adults with intellectual and developmental disabilities by offering a loving, nurturing, and affordable residential community, along with structured…

    Housing & Shelter
    6
    Central Florida Childrens Home

    To provide homes for disadvantaged children.

    Human Services
    7
    Deedco Gardens Inc

    To provide low income housing to elderly families in homestead, florida.

    Housing & Shelter
    8
    Kathleen Anderson Comprehensive Work Center Inc

    Inspire of central florida trains uniquely-abled individuals in life skills, social skills, and continuing education. our organization serves individuals with disabilities 18 years and older.

    Employment
    9
    Fulfillment House Inc
    Health
    10
    Bryant Homes Inc

    Transitional Living Services for ex-offe

    11
    Pathways to Care Inc

    Pathways to care is dedicated to providing health, housing and hope to central floridas homeless.

    Health
    12
    Employment Network of Sw Florida

    To transform the lives of individuals with disabilities throught insightful guidance and support needed to obtain and maintain meaningful employment.

    Employment

    For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Sunrisearc Inc and the most unlike its peers is Leesburg Food Bank Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

    04the grantee network

    8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

    Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

    Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 9 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

    0
    Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
    1
    Early backer (in before they grew)
    7/8
    Grantees still filing
    6/8
    Grew since you first funded

    Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

    SUNRISEARC INC — $160,000 · Human ServicesSUNRISEARC INCDUVALL HOMES INC — $155,000 · Human ServicesDUVALL HOMES INCChristian Care Center Inc — $20,000 · Human ServicesChristian Care Center IncNEW BEGINNINGS OF CENTRAL FLORIDA INC — $67,500 · OtherNEW BEGINNINGS OF CENTRAL…LEESBURG FOOD BANK INC — $25,000 · OtherLEESBURG FOOD BANK INCTHE SOCIETY OF SAINT VINCENT DE PAU — $23,000 · OtherTHE SOCIETY OF SAINT VINC…SCARC INC — $22,000 · OtherSCARC INCTROUT LAKE NATURE CENTER INC — $89,450 · EnvironmentTROUT LAKE NATUR…FORWARD PATHS FOUNDATION INC — $50,000 · Youth DevelopmentFORWARD P…
    Human Services$335,000Other$137,500Environment$89,450Youth Development$50,000

    Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

    25%50%75%100%$1.0Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetSUNRISEARC INC — $160,000 over 4y, 0.9% of budgetDUVALL HOMES INC — $155,000 over 4y, 0.7% of budgetTROUT LAKE NATURE CENTER INC — $89,450 over 4y, 8.4% of budgetNEW BEGINNINGS OF CENTRAL FLORIDA INC — $67,500 over 4y, 1.8% of budgetFORWARD PATHS FOUNDATION INC — $50,000 over 4y, 1.4% of budgetLEESBURG FOOD BANK INC — $25,000 over 4y, 3.7% of budgetChristian Care Center Inc — $20,000 over 4y, 0.3% of budget
    Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

    A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

    • Who funds SUNRISEARC INC
    • Who funds DUVALL HOMES INC
    • Who funds TROUT LAKE NATURE CENTER INC
    • Who funds NEW BEGINNINGS OF CENTRAL FLORIDA INC
    • Who funds FORWARD PATHS FOUNDATION INC
    • Who funds LEESBURG FOOD BANK INC
    • Who funds SCARC INC
    • Who funds Christian Care Center Inc

    The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

    William M and Marian R Haywood Charitable TrustFL17.9× affinity6 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

    Open a dossier: William M and Marian R Haywood Charitable Trust · Amazonsmile Foundation

    Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

    Government reliance of your grantees

    Every dot is one organization Larry L and Michele M Murphy Charitable Trust funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

    2025
    202122232425
    no gov · 50%1%3%6%10%your share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 0%
    • Christian Care Center Inc0% of income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    5get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Larry L and Michele M Murphy Charitable Trust?

    Find your warmest path to Larry L and Michele M Murphy Charitable Trust through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 9 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph