· Private foundation
Larry and Sharon Larson Charitable Foundation
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What it funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.
Where the money goes
Grants by size, and the largest recipients.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k1 grant · $660
- $50k–250k1 grant · $146k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| MAYO CLINIC DONOR ADVISED FUND | $146,492 |
| Individual grant recipient | $660 |
Does the money reach high-need areas?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.
Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
How this is measured
How this is measured
Who it funds again
Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.
Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +54% since the first grant, against +49% for those funded once.
8 repeat relationships: 1 still active in FY2024, 7 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 0% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $146k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
How this is measured
Backed again, and grew
- IGIndividual grant recipient4× · 2017–2020 · $141k
- IGIndividual grant recipient2× · 2023–2024 · $133k
- MCMAYO CLINIC FOUNDATION6× · 2017–2022 · $85k
Funded once
- LRLAKEWOOD REGIONAL HEALTHCARE FOUNDATIONone grant, 2018 · $10k · revenue +13%
- LCLOW COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETYone grant, 2020 · $2k
- ISINDUS SCHOOL DISTRICTone grant, 2017 · $1k
How this is measured
Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
Closest unfunded matches
The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Wwf's mission is to conserve nature and reduce the most pressing threats to the diversity of life on earth. (continued on schedule o)
We champion the health needs of children and families. we are committed to improving children's health by providing the highest-quality, family centered care, advanced through research and education.
Founded in 1877, american humane association, dba american humane society (american humane) is committed to ensuring the safety, welfare and well-being of animals. our leadership programs are first to serve in promoting and nurturing the…
Children's cancer research fund fuels transformational research to bring better treatments and cures to children with cancer.
Ci works to spotlight and secure the critical benefits that nature provides to humanity.
Leadership in the prevention, treatment, and cure of cancer through excellence, vision and cost effectiveness in patient care, outreach programs, research, and education.
To advance the business and policy interests of america's cooperatives and other farmer-owned enterprises.
See schedule o:asco is a professional oncology society committed to conquering cancer through research, education, and promotion of the highest quality patient care.
Ocean conservancy unites science, people, and policy to protect our ocean, today and for generations to come.
Susan g. komen 's mission is to save lives by meeting the most critical needs in our communities & investing in breakthrough research to prevent & cure breast cancer.
Inspiring communities to save wildlife for future generations.
Asco association promotes the common business interests of its members by: (1) advocating for policies that improve the quality of cancer care; (2) maintaining the highest standards of oncology medical care through programs supporting…
How this is measured
10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.
How this is measured
Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 23 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.
Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee
Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding
A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds LAKEWOOD REGIONAL HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds STORY BOOK LODGE CHRISTIAN CAMP ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC ↗
- Who funds FAMILY MISSIONS COMPANY ↗
- Who funds MINNESOTA ZOO FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL CHILD SAFETY COUNCIL ↗
- Who funds ANGEL FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS ↗
- Who funds NORTHWEST MINNESOTA FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds THE NATURE CONSERVANCY ↗
How much its grantees rely on government
Each dot is one organization Larry and Sharon Larson Charitable Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Larry and Sharon Larson Charitable Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.
How this is measured
Play a game based on Larry and Sharon Larson’s filings →