· Public charity
Larry and Jeanette Epping Family Foundation C/O Pioneer Trust Bank
The corporation is organized and at all times shall operate exclusively for the benefit of, to perform the functions of, or to carry out the purposes of our supported charities, all of which are non-profit organizations described in irc section 501(c)(3).
Read this first · the figures below need context
57% of Larry and Jeanette Epping Family Foundation C/O Pioneer Trust Bank’s FY2024 grant dollars went to The Salem Foundation, not to grantees.
Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2024 names 7 organizations directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it. Everything below is therefore FY2020, the last year Larry and Jeanette Epping Family Foundation C/O Pioneer Trust Bank named its own grantees at scale: 7 organizations, $7M. It is dated, not current.
Organizations named directly on the return
Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.
What you funded, over time
Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2020
- $50k–250k2 grants · $303k
- $250k+7 grants · $7.1M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| THE BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF SALEM MARION AND POLK COUNTIES INC | $2,415,000 |
| OREGON COMMUNITY FOUNDATION | $1,216,525 |
| THE SALEM FOUNDATION | $838,075 |
| MT ANGEL ABBEY | $823,168 |
| ARCHBISHOP FRANCIS NORBERT BLANCHET SCHOOL | $700,000 |
| SALEM CATHOLIC SCHOOLS FOUNDATION | $625,000 |
| BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA CASCADE PACIFIC COUNCIL | $500,000 |
| ROMAN CATHOLIC ARCHDIOCESE OF PORTLAND IN OREGON | $222,546 |
| BENEDICTINE SISTERS OF MT ANGEL | $80,300 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY17–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 99% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +94% since the first grant, against 0% for the ones you funded once.
7 repeat relationships — 7 still active in FY2020, 0 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2020 (too recent to call). Read against FY2020, the last year this funder named its own grantees directly; its giving has since run through a sponsor, which reports no donor behind each grant.
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 89% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $400k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF SALEM MARION & POLK COUNTIES8× · 2017–2024 · $8.7M · revenue +111% · 43% of their budget- AFARCHBISHOP FRANCIS N BLANCHET SCHOOL8× · 2017–2024 · $3.8M · revenue +94%
- BSBOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA7× · 2017–2023 · $2.6M · revenue +24%
Funded once
- CPCASCADE PACIFIC COUNCIL BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICAone grant, 2024 · $400k · revenue 0%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
7 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 7 of the 10 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds THE SALEM FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF SALEM MARION & POLK COUNTIES ↗
- Who funds THE OREGON COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds SALEM CATHOLIC SCHOOLS FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds ARCHBISHOP FRANCIS N BLANCHET SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA ↗
- Who funds CASCADE PACIFIC COUNCIL BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Oregon Community Foundation · Gelco Charitable Foundation · The Salem Foundation · OCF Joseph E Weston Public Foundation · American Endowment Foundation · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Larry and Jeanette Epping Family Foundation C/O Pioneer Trust Bank funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- The Oregon Community Foundation — 2% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Larry and Jeanette Epping Family Foundation C/O Pioneer Trust Bank?
Find your warmest path to Larry and Jeanette Epping Family Foundation C/O Pioneer Trust Bank through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.