Skip to content

· Private foundation

Lark White Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$18k
Granted FY2025still arriving
3
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$8k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2025.

Arts & Culture$220kSocial Science$3kEducation$2kPhilanthropy$250
02FY2025 · 3 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$5,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$57k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
THE GOODMAN THEATRE$7,500
STEEP THEATRE$5,000
HUBBARD STREET DANCE CHICAGO$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY18–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 89% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%WELLESLEY COLLEGE: $300 → 7%HARVARD BUSINESS SCHOOL: $2k → 16%TIDES FOUNDATION: $250 → 10%THE RAVINIA FESTIVAL: $5k → 8%STEEP THEATRE: $10k → 14%DARTMOUTH COLLEGE: $500 → 10%WELLESLEY COLLEGE: $300 → 7%HARVARD BUSINESS SCHOOL: $250 → 16%THE RAVINIA FESTIVAL: $5k → 8%STEEP THEATRE: $7k → 14%DARTMOUTH COLLEGE: $300 → 10%WELLESLEY COLLEGE: $250 → 7%HARVARD BUSINESS SCHOOL: $250 → 16%THE RAVINIA FESTIVAL: $3k → 8%STEEP THEATRE: $5k → 14%DARTMOUTH COLLEGE: $250 → 10%THE RAVINIA FESTIVAL: $3k → 8%STEEP THEATRE: $5k → 14%THE RAVINIA FESTIVAL: $3k → 8%WRITERS' THEATRE: $5k → 14%THE RAVINIA FESTIVAL: $3k → 8%WRITERS' THEATRE: $5k → 14%THE RAVINIA FESTIVAL: $3k → 8%WRITERS' THEATRE: $1k → 14%THE GOODMAN THEATRE: $20k → 14%THE GOODMAN THEATRE: $18k → 14%THE GOODMAN THEATRE: $18k → 14%THE GOODMAN THEATRE: $18k → 14%THE GOODMAN THEATRE: $15k → 14%THE GOODMAN THEATRE: $10k → 14%THE GOODMAN THEATRE: $9k → 14%THE GOODMAN THEATRE: $8k → 14%HUBBARD STREET DANCE CHICAGO: $5k → 14%HUBBARD STREET DANCE CHICAGO: $3k → 14%HUBBARD STREET DANCE CHICAGO: $10k → 14%HUBBARD STREET DANCE CHICAGO: $8k → 14%HUBBARD STREET DANCE CHICAGO: $8k → 14%HUBBARD STREET DANCE CHICAGO: $5k → 14%THEO UBIQUE CABARET THEATRE: $3k → 14%THEO UBIQUE CABARET THEATRE: $3k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

100%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$223k · 8 repeat orgs$1k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +16% since the first grant, against -45% for those funded once.

8 repeat relationships: 3 still active in FY2025, 5 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

8
1

Total granted

$223k
$1k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+16%
-45%

Still filing today

75%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CT
    CHICAGO THEATRE GROUP INC
    8× · 2018–2025 · $114k · revenue +16%
  • RAVINIA FESTIVAL ASSOCIATION
    7× · 2018–2024 · $25k · revenue +50%
  • WC
    Wellesley College
    3× · 2020–2023 · $850 · revenue +42%

Funded once

  • CF
    ChiArts Foundation
    one grant, 2021 · $1k · revenue -45%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Chicago High School for the Arts

The chicago high school for the arts (chiarts) develops the next generation of diverse, artistically promising scholar-artists through intensive pre-professional training in the arts, combined with a comprehensive college preparatory…

Education
2
Chicago Opera Theater

Chicago opera theater expands the tradition of opera as a living art form by engaging lovers of music and storytelling through innovative experiences, predominantly of new and rarely performed works.

Arts & Culture
3
Music and Dance Theater Chicago Inc
Arts & Culture
4
Chicago Shakespeare Theater

To create vivid, entertaining theatrical experiences that invigorate and engage people of all ages and identities by illuminating the complexity, ambiguity, and wonder of our world. shared humanity and unforgettable stories - now this is…

Arts & Culture
5
Rivendell Theatre Ensemble

Rivendell Theatre Ensemble is a professional Equity company dedicated to elevating the lives of women through the power of theatre.

Arts & Culture
6
Wheaton College

Wheaton college provides a transformative liberal arts education, combining theory and practice, for intellectually curious students within a collaborative and vibrant extended community and network that values and strives to create an…

Education
7
American Repertory Theatre Co Inc

Seeks to expand the boundaries of theater, producing, performing and presenting works of literary, experimental and educational value. provide a home for outstanding artists, a training ground for young artists (including an extensive…

Arts & Culture
8
Classical Theatre Company

Classical Theatre Company is dedicated to boldly re-envisioning classical drama on the stage, in the community, and in the classroom through engaging and enlightening plays that bring them new life and relevance while maintaining the…

Arts & Culture
9
President and Trustees of Bates College

Bates is a college of the liberal arts and sciences, and is a coeducational, nonsectarian, residential college with special commitments to academic rigor, and to assuring in all of its efforts the dignity of each individual, and access to…

Education
10
Center Stage Associates Inc

See schedule o.inspired by our home city, baltimore center stage acts as a cultural catalyst for all communities to access theater in every form and engage in compelling conversations. programming: capture the collective imagination and…

Arts & Culture
11
New York City Center Inc

The mission of new york city center is to be new york city's leading center for dance and musical theater. dedicated to making the arts accessible to the broadest possible audience, city center seeks to create a welcoming environment and…

Arts & Culture
12
Central Square Theater Inc

Central square theater, the oldest female-led theater organization in greater boston, is an innovator in the non-profit arts field in collaborative leadership. cst engages over 35,000 people annually through live performance, rigorous…

Arts & Culture
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Chicago Theatre Group Inc; the most unlike its peers is Trustees of Dartmouth College. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 11 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
4/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CHICAGO THEATRE GROUP INC: $114,000 · Arts & CultureCHICAGO THEATRE GROUP INCHUBBARD STREET DANCE CHICAGO: $37,500 · Arts & CultureHUBBARD STREET DANCE CHICAGOSTEEP THEATRE: $27,000 · Arts & CultureSTEEP THEATRERAVINIA FESTIVAL ASSOCIATION: $24,800 · Arts & CultureRAVINIA FESTIVAL ASSOCIATIONWriters Theatre Inc: $11,000 · Arts & CultureTHEO UBIQUE CABARET THEATRE: $5,000 · OtherHARVARD BUSINESS SCHOOL: $2,500 · OtherTrustees of Dartmouth College: $1,050 · EducationChiArts Foundation: $1,000 · EducationWellesley College: $850 · EducationTIDES FOUNDATION: $250 · Philanthropy
Arts & Culture$214,300Other$7,500Education$2,900Philanthropy$250

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCHICAGO THEATRE GROUP INC: $114,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetHUBBARD STREET DANCE CHICAGO: $37,500 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetSTEEP THEATRE: $27,000 over 4y, 1.2% of budgetRAVINIA FESTIVAL ASSOCIATION: $24,800 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetWriters Theatre Inc: $11,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetTrustees of Dartmouth College: $1,050 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetChiArts Foundation: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWellesley College: $850 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTIDES FOUNDATION: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds CHICAGO THEATRE GROUP INC ↗
  • Who funds HUBBARD STREET DANCE CHICAGO ↗
  • Who funds STEEP THEATRE ↗
  • Who funds RAVINIA FESTIVAL ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds Writers Theatre Inc ↗
  • Who funds Trustees of Dartmouth College ↗
  • Who funds ChiArts Foundation ↗
  • Who funds Wellesley College ↗
  • Who funds TIDES FOUNDATION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Chicago Community TrustIL12.9× affinity4 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Chicago Community Trust · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Lark White Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Lark White Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →median 1%
  • Wellesley College: 1% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 11 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Lark White’s filings →

More from the funding graph