Skip to content

· Private foundation

Landman-Goldman Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$306k
Granted FY2025still arriving
7
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$75k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$904kArts & Culture$390kAnimals$261kHuman Services$248kHealth$217kYouth Development$26k
02FY2025 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k5 grants · $163k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $143k
$40,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$4.4M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
TOLEDO MUSEUM OF ART$75,000
TOLEDO PUBLIC SCHOOLS$68,240
PLANNED PARENTHOOD GREATER TOLEDO$42,000
LOURDES UNIVERSITY$40,000
TOLEDO TOMORROW$35,000
BOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF TOLEDO$25,500
IMAGINATION STATION$20,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–23, $248k) land where the poverty rate runs at 18%, against an area that typically sits at 15%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 15%TOLEDO DAY NURSERY: $70k → 18%TOLEDO DAY NURSERY: $48k → 18%TOLEDO DAY NURSERY: $36k → 18%TOLEDO DAY NURSERY: $35k → 18%TOLEDO DAY NURSERY: $35k → 18%TOLEDO DAY NURSERY: $25k → 18%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

95%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.9M · 10 repeat orgs$108k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +50% since the first grant, against +5% for those funded once.

10 repeat relationships: 5 still active in FY2025, 5 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

10
3

Total granted

$1.9M
$48k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+50%
+5%

Still filing today

50%
67%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 80% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $61k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationAnimalsArts & CultureHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TT
    THE TOLEDO MUSEUM OF ART
    9× · 2017–2025 · $360k · revenue +34%
  • TD
    TOLEDO DAY NURSERY
    6× · 2017–2023 · $248k · revenue +95%
  • TH
    TOLEDO HUMANE SOCIETY
    4× · 2017–2020 · $188k · revenue +60%

Funded once

  • PP
    PLANNED PARENTHOOD
    one grant, 2017 · $25k
  • T
    TUTORSMART
    one grant, 2022 · $13k · revenue -7%
  • RF
    READ FOR LITERACY INC
    one grant, 2017 · $10k · revenue +5%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Toledo Legal Aid Society

Toledo Legal Aid Society provides legal representation for indigent clients that are charged with criminal, traffic, or juvenile offenses for which the penalty or any possible adjudication includes the potential loss of liberty.

—
2
Toledo Science Center

Empower everyone to explore the sciences through interactive exhibits and educational programming.

Arts & Culture
3
Toledo GROWs Inc

Toledo GROWs nurtures the joy of growing. Toledo GROWs educates the community about the value of local nutritious food. Our active urban farm and support for community gardens promote healthy eating and creates a region alive with gardens.

Environment
4
The University of Toledo Foundation

The mission of the university of toledo foundation is to secure the future for the university of toledo, through prudent asset management and philanthropy. we build strong linkages between alumni and the university, fostering a spirit of…

Education
5
The Toledo Zoological Society Foundation

To secure the long-term future of the zoo, including its animal collections, education and conservation programs, magnificent gardens and historic wpa-era buildings.

Animals
6
Toledo Independent Childcare Center

Providing daycare

Human Services
7
Toledo Regional Chamber of Commerce

To solve critical business challenges in order to create vibrant economic opportunities for all in our region.

—
8
Leadership Toledo

Through a spectrum of programming for adults and high school students, lt offers individuals the opportunity to become more confident leaders, connect with the community, grow stronger in self-awareness, and serve in ways that are…

—
9
Partners in Education of Toledo

Partners in education's mission is to provide evidence-based programs, in collaboration with schools and community partners, to empower students with the skills they need to read, succeed, and thrive. the organization promotes student…

Education
10
Toledo Christian Schools Foundation

To further the educational purposes of toledo christian schools, inc.

Education
11
Toledo Animal Shelter Association

See schedule oto care for and to provide temporary and indefinite shelter and care for homeless and abandoned dogs and cats by promoting and sponsoring animal welfare education programs, adoptions, preventive veterinary care, and a…

Animals
12
The Toledo Bar Association

Provide outstanding service to our members and to assist them in serving the legal profession and the community.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Toledo Museum of Art; the most unlike its peers is Read for Literacy Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 15 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
7/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

TOLEDO PUBLIC SCHOOLS FND: $576,990 · OtherTOLEDO PUBLIC SCHOOLS FNDPLANNED PARENTHOOD GREATER TOLEDO: $192,000 · OtherPLANNED PARENTHOOD GREATER TOLEDOLIBRARY LEGACY FOUNDATION: $60,000 · OtherLIBRARY LEGACY FOUNDATION+4 more: $110,500 · Other+4 moreTHE TOLEDO MUSEUM OF ART: $360,000 · Arts & CultureTHE TOLEDO MUSEUM O…TOLEDO HUMANE SOCIETY: $188,405 · AnimalsTOLEDO HUMANE …THE TOLEDO ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY: $72,500 · AnimalsTHE TOLEDO ZOO…TOLEDO DAY NURSERY: $248,000 · Human ServicesTOLEDO DAY NU…LOURDES UNIVERSITY: $180,000 · EducationLOURDES UNIVE…TOLEDO TOMORROW: $35,000 · EducationTOLEDO TOMORR…TUTORSMART: $12,500 · EducationREAD FOR LITERACY INC: $10,000 · Education
Other$939,490Arts & Culture$360,000Animals$260,905Human Services$248,000Education$237,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE TOLEDO MUSEUM OF ART: $360,000 over 9y, 0.3% of budgetTOLEDO DAY NURSERY: $248,000 over 6y, 4.5% of budgetTOLEDO HUMANE SOCIETY: $188,405 over 4y, 2.2% of budgetLOURDES UNIVERSITY: $180,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetTHE TOLEDO ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY: $72,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetTUTORSMART: $12,500 over 1y, 3.2% of budgetREAD FOR LITERACY INC: $10,000 over 1y, 2.4% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE TOLEDO MUSEUM OF ART ↗
  • Who funds TOLEDO DAY NURSERY ↗
  • Who funds TOLEDO HUMANE SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds LOURDES UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds THE TOLEDO ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds TOLEDO TOMORROW ↗
  • Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF TOLEDO AND THE TOLEDO NEWSBOYS ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds TUTORSMART ↗
  • Who funds READ FOR LITERACY INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Toledo Community Foundation IncOH26× affinity10 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Toledo Community Foundation Inc · John Henry Eldred Jr Foundation · The O-I Charities Foundation · Walter E Terhune Memorial Fund · Robert C and Susan M Savage Family Foundation · United Way of Greater Toledo · Carolyn and Herbert Metzger Foundation · The Trompeter Family Foundation · The Oswald Supporting Organization · The LaValley Foundation · Dana Charitable Foundation · George Isaac Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Landman-Goldman Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Landman-Goldman Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Landman-Goldman Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Landman-Goldman Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 15 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Landman-Goldman’s filings →

    More from the funding graph