Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Lance & Deborah Vander Hoek Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$23k
Granted FY2025still arriving
6
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$5k
Largest
01What you fund
0198% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Education$56kHuman Services$45kHealth$37kFood & Nutrition$14kEnvironment$10kYouth Development$5kOther$0
02FY2025 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$5,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$137k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Whatcom Hospice Foundation$5,000
Tunnel to Towers Foundation$5,000
Assumption Catholic School$5,000
Upper Valley Mend$2,500
Blaine Food Bank Association$2,500
Wounded Warrior Project$2,500
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–17, $5k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%HOPELINK: $5k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

82%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$141k · 9 repeat orgs$30k to everyone else

9 repeat relationships — 6 still active in FY2025, 3 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

9
6

Total granted

$141k
$30k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+39%
+145%

Still filing today

89%
67%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthHuman ServicesEducationArts & CultureOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $40k · revenue +70%
  • TW
    THE WHATCOM HOSPICE FOUNDATION
    3× · 2023–2025 · $12k · revenue +29%
  • WR
    WENATCHEE RIVER INSTITUTE
    2× · 2017–2022 · $10k · revenue +179%

Funded once

  • ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INCgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $5k · revenue +145%
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2021 · $5k
  • SHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDRENgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $5k · revenue +120%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Uw Physicians Network

To improve the health of the public.

Education
2
Seattle Children's Hospital

Seattle children's hospital (seattle children's) will be an innovative leader in pediatric health and wellness through our unsurpassed quality, clinical care, relentless spirit of inquiry, and compassion for all children and their…

Health
3
The Association of Chrmc and University Physicians

Children's university medical group (cumg) is the non-profit pediatric group practice established to support the academic, research and clinical missions of its corporate members, university of washington school of medicine (uwsom) and…

Health
4
Swedish Edmonds

Swedish edmonds is part of swedish health services, a healthcare system committed to meeting the health-care needs of snohomish county.

Health
5
Western Healthconnect

Support significant improvements in health care delivery and outcomes within the context of nonprofit, charitable ownership.

Health
6
Western University of Health Sciences

To produce, in a humanistic tradition, health care professionals and biomedical knowledge that will enhance and extend the quality of life in our communities.

7
Seattle Children's Healthcare System

Seattle children's healthcare system (schs) is engaged in activities relating to the provision of health care services to infants, children, and adolescents, delivering and improving the delivery and the quality of those services through…

Health
8
Wenatchee Valley Hospital

We are dedicated to improving our patients' health by providing safe, high-quality care in a compassionate and cost-effective manner.

9
Salem Health Hospitals & Clinics

To support salem health, salem health west valley and related organizations.

10
Southwestern Vermont Healthcare Foundation Inc

The sole purpose of the svhc foundation shall be to engage in development and fundraising activities exclusively for the support of the southwestern vermont health care corporation and affiliates.

Health
11
Southwestern Vermont Medical Center

Southwestern vermont health care exists to provide exceptional health care and comfort to the people we serve. see schedule o for additional details.

Health
12
The Association of University Physicians

The association of university physicians is a clinical practice plan for the university of washington school of medicine ("uwsom") faculty physicians and non-physician practitioners and provides substantial support to the uwsom.

Education

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Seattle Children's Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Hillsdale College. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 16 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/13
Grantees still filing
11/13
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Assumption Catholic School — $35,000 · OtherAssumption Catholic SchoolBLAINE FOOD BANK ASSOCIATION — $7,000 · OtherBLAINE FOOD BANK ASSOCIATIONUPPER VALLEY MEND — $7,000 · OtherUPPER VALLEY MENDIndividual grant recipient — $5,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientSeattle Children's Foundation — $5,000 · OtherSeattle Children's FoundationHILLCREST KIDS — $5,000 · OtherHILLCREST KIDSWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC — $40,000 · Human ServicesWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INCHOPELINK — $5,000 · Human ServicesHOPELINKTHE WHATCOM HOSPICE FOUNDATION — $12,000 · HealthTHE WHATCOM HOSPICE F…CASCADE MEDICAL FOUNDATION — $10,000 · HealthCASCADE MEDICAL FOUND…ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC — $5,000 · HealthST JUDE CHILDREN'S RE…SHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN — $5,000 · HealthSHRINERS HOSPITALS FO…Upper Valley Christian School — $10,000 · EducationUpper Valley …STEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION — $9,500 · EducationSTEPHEN SILLE…HILLSDALE COLLEGE — $1,000 · EducationWENATCHEE RIVER INSTITUTE — $10,000 · Arts & Culture
Other$64,000Human Services$45,000Health$32,000Education$20,500Arts & Culture$10,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC — $40,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetTHE WHATCOM HOSPICE FOUNDATION — $12,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetWENATCHEE RIVER INSTITUTE — $10,000 over 2y, 1.2% of budgetCASCADE MEDICAL FOUNDATION — $10,000 over 2y, 3.9% of budgetSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION — $9,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetBLAINE FOOD BANK ASSOCIATION — $7,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetUPPER VALLEY MEND — $7,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHOPELINK — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSeattle Children's Foundation — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHILLSDALE COLLEGE — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Seattle FoundationWA13.1× affinity4 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Seattle Foundation · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Lance & Deborah Vander Hoek Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 0%
  • Wounded Warrior Project Inc0% of income from government
  • Shriners Hospitals for Children0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 16 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph