Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Lalit and Anubha Gupta Foundation Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$89k
Granted FY2024still arriving
5
Grants FY2024still arriving
5
States reached
$55k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172024.

Health$315kInternational$88kArts & Culture$61kEmployment$30kYouth Development$26kEducation$19kFood & Nutrition$10kCrime & Legal$3kOther$0
02FY2024 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k3 grants · $9k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $25k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $55k
$5,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$932k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
AM ASSOC FOR STUDY OF LIVER DISEASE$55,000
PRATHAM$25,000
AID INC$5,000
INTERNATIONAL MEDICAL RELIEF$3,695
Individual grant recipient$250
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–23, $11k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 9% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%A FUTURE FOR EVERY CHILD: $10k → 8%SEWA INTERNATIONAL: $1k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

IL
NY
MA
IN
OH
CA
CO
VA
MD
DC
TX

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

65%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$356k · 11 repeat orgs$195k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +98% since the first grant, against +20% for the ones you funded once.

11 repeat relationships — 2 still active in FY2024, 9 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

11
28

Total granted

$356k
$186k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+98%
+20%

Still filing today

55%
54%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 90% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $9k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’20’21’22’23’24
HealthArts & CultureInternationalFood & NutritionHuman ServicesEducationOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AA
    AMERICAN ASSOCIATION FOR THE STUDY OF LIVER DISEASES
    2× · 2023–2024 · $110k · revenue +14%
  • AF
    ASSOCIATION FOR INDIAS DEVELOPMENT INC
    5× · 2017–2023 · $41k · revenue +33%
  • EI
    EDU-GIRLS INC
    4× · 2020–2023 · $16k · revenue +82%

Funded once

  • AA
    AMERICAN ASSOCIATION FOR THE STUDY OF LIVER DISEASES FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2020 · $55k · revenue +11%
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2021 · $50k
  • AF
    A FUTURE FOR EVERY CHILDgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $10k · revenue +76%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Akshaya Patra Foundation (Usa)

The mission of the foundation is to simultaneously address childhood hunger and malnutrition and to promote education for children throughout india.

Food & Nutrition
2
The American India Foundation

The american india foundation(aif) is a nonprofit american development organization that is devoted to accelerating social and economic change in india.

Public Safety & Disaster
3
Development Data Lab Inc

DDL`s Work is designed to widen public access to and use of economic, demographic and physical data that describes, defines and seeks to alleviate poverty, especially in the developing world

International
4
Actionaid Usa

Actionaid is an international network building a just, equitable, and sustainable world in solidarity with communities on the frontlines of poverty and injustice. actionaid usa is the u.s. branch of actionaid international, which works in…

Social Science
5
Observer Research Foundation America

Organization mission the observer research foundation america orf america is an independent, non-partisan, and nonprofit organization in washington dc dedicated to addressing policy challenges facing the united states, india, and their…

International
6
Fajr Scientific

To provide multi-specialty surgical care, humanitarian aid and educational support to people in low- and middle-income countries.

Science & Tech
7
Asociacion Interamericana Para La Defensa Del Ambiente

To strenghten people's ability to guarantee their individual and collective right to a healthy environment, via the development, implementation, and effective enforcement of national and international law.

Crime & Legal
8
Global Impact Investing Network Inc

The global impact investing network, inc. is dedicated to increasing the scale and effectiveness of impact investing to solve systemic problems facing people and the planet. impact investments are investments made into companies,…

Philanthropy
9
Iit Research Institute

Perform basic research and preclinical efficacy assessments of new molecular entities being developed for the prevention and treatment of cancer and infectious disease. Discover new pathways and targets for the design and development of…

Science & Tech
10
Indigenous Peoples Rights Inc

To lead and coordinate the global initiative to address and prevent criminalization, violence, and impunity against indigenous peoples towards strengthening their collectives, solidarity, and actions.

Human Services
11
International Aids Vaccine Initiative Inc

A nonprofit scientific research organization that develops vaccines and antibodies for hiv, tuberculosis, and emerging infectious diseases.

International
12
Pratham International Inc

Pratham international was established to support learning innovations for children and youth in contexts across the globe. the organization facilitates the adaptation and dissemination of proven, scalable solutions, such as the…

International

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Association for Indias Development Inc and the most unlike its peers is India Development Service. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

22 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 22 of the 42 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
9
Early backer (in before they grew)
22/22
Grantees still filing
20/22
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF STUDY OF — $110,000 · OtherAMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF STUDY OFIndividual grant recipient — $50,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientPRATHAM — $35,000 · OtherPRATHAMIndia Development Service — $12,000 · OtherPSC PARTNERS SEEKING A CURE — $10,000 · Other+21 more — $57,138 · Other+21 moreAMERICAN ASSOCIATION FOR THE STUDY OF LIVER DISEASES — $110,000 · HealthAMERICAN ASSOCIATION FOR THE STUDY…AMERICAN ASSOCIATION FOR THE STUDY OF LIVER DISEASES FOUNDATION — $55,000 · HealthAMERICAN ASSOCIATION FOR THE STUDY…+2 more — $3,945 · HealthASSOCIATION FOR INDIAS DEVELOPMENT INC — $41,340 · InternationalASSOCIATION FO…EDU-GIRLS INC — $15,600 · InternationalEDU-GIRLS INCBLIND FOUNDATION FOR INDIA — $15,000 · InternationalBLIND FOUNDATI…MARTHA'S TABLE INC — $8,000 · Food & NutritionGLOBAL PRAGATHI INC — $5,000 · Food & NutritionCAPITAL AREA FOOD BANK INC — $1,500 · Food & NutritionA FUTURE FOR EVERY CHILD — $10,000 · Human ServicesSewa International Inc — $1,000 · Human ServicesIndiana University Foundation — $7,500 · EducationGREATER WASHINGTON EDUCATIONAL TELECOMMUNICATIONS ASSOCIATION INC — $1,250 · Arts & CultureHINDU AMERICAN FOUNDATION INC — $1,001 · Arts & CultureSTELLA ADLER STUDIO OF ACTING — $513 · Arts & Culture
Other$274,138Health$168,945International$71,940Food & Nutrition$14,500Human Services$11,000Education$7,500Arts & Culture$2,764

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetAMERICAN ASSOCIATION FOR THE STUDY OF LIVER DISEASES — $110,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetAMERICAN ASSOCIATION FOR THE STUDY OF LIVER DISEASES FOUNDATION — $55,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetASSOCIATION FOR INDIAS DEVELOPMENT INC — $41,340 over 5y, 0.7% of budgetEDU-GIRLS INC — $15,600 over 4y, 0.9% of budgetBLIND FOUNDATION FOR INDIA — $15,000 over 3y, 1.7% of budgetIndia Development Service — $12,000 over 3y, 1.9% of budgetA FUTURE FOR EVERY CHILD — $10,000 over 1y, 2.1% of budgetPSC PARTNERS SEEKING A CURE — $10,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetMARTHA'S TABLE INC — $8,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetIndiana University Foundation — $7,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetGLOBAL PRAGATHI INC — $5,000 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetINTERNATIONAL MEDICAL RELIEF — $3,695 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE BAIL PROJECT INC — $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPRATHAM USA — $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCAPITAL AREA FOOD BANK INC — $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGREATER WASHINGTON EDUCATIONAL TELECOMMUNICATIONS ASSOCIATION INC — $1,250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHINDU AMERICAN FOUNDATION INC — $1,001 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSTELLA ADLER STUDIO OF ACTING — $513 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetANIMAL OUTLOOK INC — $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCROHN'S & COLITIS FOUNDATION INC — $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHESAPEAKE CLIMATE ACTION NETWORK INC — $104 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

AbbVie FoundationIL13.2× affinity5 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: AbbVie Foundation · Globalgiving Foundation Inc · Bright Funds Foundation · Ge Aerospace Foundation · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Silicon Valley Community Foundation · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · Verizon Foundation · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Lalit and Anubha Gupta Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 40%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    4get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Lalit and Anubha Gupta Foundation Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Lalit and Anubha Gupta Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 42 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph