Skip to content

· Private foundation

Lake Murray Kiwanis Club Foundation

Its FY2020 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$68k
Granted FY2020
17
Grants FY2020
2
States reached
$7k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2020.

Education$31kHuman Services$21kHealth$16kRecreation & Sports$10kCrime & Legal$7kPublic Safety & Disaster$7k
02FY2020 · 17 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$5,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
San Diego Sheriffs Foundation$7,000
San Diego Police Foundation$7,000
ALS Assoc Greater San Diego Chapter$5,500
Autism Speaks San Diegp$5,000
Guide Dogs for the Blind$5,000
Operation AMPED$5,000
Rady Childrens Hospital$5,000
Veterans Village of San Diego$5,000
Sports for Exceptional Athletes$5,000
RHMS Charities$5,000
Cal-Nev-HA Childrens Foundation$4,893
Ronald McDonald House of San Diego$1,500
Individual grant recipient$1,500
Individual grant recipient$1,500
Individual grant recipient$1,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY18–20) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 28% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%KYDS Foundation: $500 → 11%Rady Childrens Hospital: $5k → 11%Cal-Nev-HA Childrens Foundation: $5k → 14%Operation AMPED: $5k → 14%Autism Speaks San Diegp: $5k → 17%Kiwanis Key Leader: $395 → 16%Aktion ClubKYDS Foundation: $160 → 11%Sports for Exceptional Athletes: $5k → 11%RHMS Charities: $5k → 11%Ronald McDonald House of San Diego: $2k → 11%March of Dimes: $250 → 11%ALS Assoc Greater San Diego Chapter: $6k → 11%Veterans Village of San Diego: $5k → 11%San Diego Police Foundation: $7k → 11%San Diego Sheriffs Foundation: $7k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its field
04the grantee network

6 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 6 of the 44 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
6/6
Grantees still filing
3/6
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

San Diego Sheriffs Foundation: $7,000 · OtherSan Diego Sheriffs FoundationRHMS Charities: $5,000 · OtherRHMS CharitiesOPERATION AMPED: $5,000 · OtherOPERATION AMPEDAutism Speaks San Diegp: $5,000 · OtherAutism Speaks San DiegpRady Childrens Hospital: $5,000 · OtherRady Childrens HospitalCal-Nev-HA Childrens Foundation: $4,893 · OtherCal-Nev-HA Childrens Foundation+32 more: $32,055 · Other+32 moreSAN DIEGO POLICE FOUNDATION: $7,000 · Crime & LegalALS UNITED GREATER SAN DIEGO: $5,500 · HealthMARCH OF DIMES INC: $250 · HealthVIETNAM VETERANS OF SAN DIEGO DBA VETERANS VILLAGE OF SAN DIEGO: $5,000 · Public BenefitGUIDE DOGS FOR THE BLIND INC: $5,000 · Human ServicesSPORTS FOR EXCEPTIONAL ATHLETES: $5,000 · Recreation & Sports
Other$63,948Crime & Legal$7,000Health$5,750Public Benefit$5,000Human Services$5,000Recreation & Sports$5,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSAN DIEGO POLICE FOUNDATION: $7,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetALS UNITED GREATER SAN DIEGO: $5,500 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetVIETNAM VETERANS OF SAN DIEGO DBA VETERANS VILLAGE OF SAN DIEGO: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGUIDE DOGS FOR THE BLIND INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSPORTS FOR EXCEPTIONAL ATHLETES: $5,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetMARCH OF DIMES INC: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds SAN DIEGO POLICE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds ALS UNITED GREATER SAN DIEGO ↗
  • Who funds VIETNAM VETERANS OF SAN DIEGO DBA VETERANS VILLAGE OF SAN DIEGO ↗
  • Who funds GUIDE DOGS FOR THE BLIND INC ↗
  • Who funds SPORTS FOR EXCEPTIONAL ATHLETES ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Sempra FoundationCA13.2× affinity4 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Sempra Foundation · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Lake Murray Kiwanis Club Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Lake Murray Kiwanis Club Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    04Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Lake Murray Kiwanis Club Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Lake Murray Kiwanis Club Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 44 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2020, released 2020. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Lake Murray Kiwanis Club’s filings →

    More from the funding graph