Skip to content
Lake Arrowhead Rotary Foundation at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

Lake Arrowhead Rotary Foundation

The organization raises money in the community in order to fund local charities and provide scholarships to the youth of the area.

$46k
Granted FY2025still arriving
10
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$4k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$36kHuman Services$16kPhilanthropy$16kHealth$16kArts & Culture$13kYouth Development$11kHousing & Shelter$7kFood & Nutrition$5kOther$0
02FY2025 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 10 grants below total $21,450, the rows itemized in this filing. The $45,550 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $24,100 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.
$2,500
Median grant
1
States reached
$1.3M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
RIM OF THE WORLD BLUE STAR MOMS CALIFORNIA CHAPTER #25$3,750
REBUILDING TOGETHER MOUNTAIN COMMUNITIES$3,000
RIM OF THE WORLD VETERANS OUTREACH$2,500
ROTARY CLUB OF CRESTLINE-LAKE GREGORY$2,500
SAN BERNARDINO MOUNTAINS LAND TRUST$2,500
HAFDRA$2,500
BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF THE MOUNTAIN COMMUNITIES$2,000
MOUNTAIN HOMELESS COALITION$1,000
HEARTS & LIVES$1,000
MT CALVARY LUTHERAN CHURCH$700
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 100% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 13%CSUSB MOUNTAINS COMMUNITY SCHOLARSHIP SOCIETY: $6k → 14%MOUNTAIN COMMUNITIES BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB: $6k → 14%MOUNTAIN COMMUNITIES BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB: $3k → 14%ROTARY CLUB OF CRESTLINE-LAKE GREGORY: $3k → 14%RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE: $5k → 14%BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF THE MOUNTAIN COMMUNITIES: $2k → 14%RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE: $5k → 14%HEARTS & LIVES: $1k → 14%MOUNTAIN HOMELESS COALITION: $1k → 14%OPERATION PROVIDER: $5k → 14%RIM OF THE WORLD EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $11k → 14%RIM OF THE WORLD HIGH SCHOOL ASB: $8k → 14%ARROWHEAD ARTS ASSOCIATION: $7k → 14%MOUNTAINS COMMUNITY HOSPITAL: $6k → 14%ARROWHEAD ARTS ASSOCIATION: $6k → 14%MOUNTAINS COMMUNITY HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $6k → 14%RIM EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $6k → 14%RIM OF THE WORLD EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $5k → 14%RIM OF THE WORLD BLUE STAR MOMS CALIFORNIA CHAPTER #25: $4k → 14%MOUNTAINS COMMUNITY HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $4k → 14%MOUNTAINS HUMANE SOCIETY PET RESCUE: $3k → 14%SAN BERNARDINO MOUNTAINS LAND TRUST: $3k → 14%HAFDRA: $3k → 14%MT CALVARY LUTHERAN CHURCH: $700 → 14%REBUILDING TOGETHER MOUNTAIN COMMUNITIES: $14k → 14%REBUILDING TOGETHER MOUNTAIN COMMUNITIES: $3k → 14%REBUILDING TOGETHER MOUNTAIN COMMUNITIES: $3k → 14%RIM OF THE WORLD VETERANS OUTREACH: $3k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

66%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$85k · 6 repeat orgs$44k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +71% since the first grant, against +6% for those funded once.

6 repeat relationships: 2 still active in FY2025, 4 since wound down; 8 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

6
5

Total granted

$85k
$28k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+71%
+6%

Still filing today

100%
40%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 23% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $16k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’22’23’24’25
PhilanthropyArts & CultureYouth DevelopmentFood & NutritionHealthEnvironmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • RO
    RIM OF THE WORLD EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION
    3× · 2018–2023 · $22k · revenue +118%
  • RT
    REBUILDING TOGETHER-MOUNTAIN COMMUNITIES
    3× · 2023–2025 · $20k · revenue +24%
  • RM
    Ronald McDonald House Global
    2× · 2020–2022 · $10k · revenue +82%

Funded once

  • RO
    RIM OF THE WORLD HIGH SCHOOL ASB
    one grant, 2018 · $8k
  • MC
    MOUNTAINS COMMUNITY HOSPITAL
    one grant, 2018 · $6k
  • CP
    CSUSB PHILANTHROPIC FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2017 · $6k · revenue +6%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Rocky Mountain Health Foundation
Health
2
Mountain Health & Community Services Inc

The mission of Mountain Health & Community Services is to improve the health and well being of the whole person.

—
3
Rocky Mountain Foundation
Human Services
4
Mountain Counties Water Resources Association

To unite agencies, groups and individuals whose interests include protecting and enhancing Mountain County water resources throughout the foreseeable future.

Community Improvement
5
Mountain Resort Communities Association of Realtors Charity Foundation Inc

Assist local food pantries and Meals on Wheels in providing canned, prepackaged and boxed food. In addition, the Foundation was formed to provide student scholarships and for other purposes established by the Board of Directors for the Big…

Philanthropy
6
Adventist Mountain Missions
Religion
7
Mt Lookout Civic Club

Support of, and advocacy for, the Mt. Lookout neighborhood of Cincinnati, OH

Education
8
Rocky Mountain Pathways
—
9
Rocky Mountain Veterans' Hunts & Excursions Inc
Recreation & Sports
10
Mountain Home Food Basket

To provide food to disadvantaged individuals and families.

—
11
Rocky Mountain Youth Corps

Rocky mountain youth corps engages young people in the outdoors, inspiring them to use their strengths and potential to lead healthy, productive lives. we teach responsibility for self, community, and environment through teamwork, service,…

Youth Development
12
Rocky Mountain Ballet Theatre
Arts & Culture
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Ronald McDonald House Global; the most unlike its peers is Dr Raymond V Mundall Family Humanitarian Aid for Development. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 19 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/13
Grantees still filing
6/13
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

RIM OF THE WORLD EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION: $21,826 · OtherRIM OF THE WORLD EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATIONRIM OF THE WORLD HIGH SCHOOL ASB: $8,000 · OtherRIM OF THE WORLD HIGH SCHOOL ASBMOUNTAINS COMMUNITY HOSPITAL: $6,416 · OtherMOUNTAINS COMMUNITY HOSPITALBLUE STAR MOTHERS OF AMERICA INC: $3,750 · OtherBLUE STAR MOTHERS OF AMERICA INCROTARY CLUB OF CRESTLINE LAKE GREGORY: $2,500 · OtherRIM OF THE WORLD VETERANS OUTREACH: $2,500 · OtherMOUNTAINS HUMANE SOCIETY PET RESCUE: $2,500 · Other+3 more: $2,700 · Other+3 moreREBUILDING TOGETHER-MOUNTAIN COMMUNITIES: $19,575 · PhilanthropyREBUILDING TOGETHER-MOUNTAIN COM…MOUNTAINS COMMUNITY HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $9,499 · PhilanthropyMOUNTAINS COMMUNITY HOSPITAL FOU…CSUSB PHILANTHROPIC FOUNDATION: $5,805 · PhilanthropyCSUSB PHILANTHROPIC FOUNDATIONDR RAYMOND V MUNDALL FAMILY HUMANITARIAN AID FOR DEVELOPMENT: $2,500 · PhilanthropyDR RAYMOND V MUNDALL FAMILY HUMA…ARROWHEAD ARTS ASSOCIATION: $12,634 · Arts & CultureARROWHEAD A…MOUNTAIN COMMUNITIES BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB: $10,925 · Youth DevelopmentMOUNTAIN …Ronald McDonald House Global: $10,200 · HealthOPERATION PROVIDER: $5,178 · Food & NutritionSAN BERNARDINO MOUNTAINS LAND TRUST: $2,500 · Environment
Other$50,192Philanthropy$37,379Arts & Culture$12,634Youth Development$10,925Health$10,200Food & Nutrition$5,178Environment$2,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetRIM OF THE WORLD EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION: $21,826 over 3y, 9.2% of budgetREBUILDING TOGETHER-MOUNTAIN COMMUNITIES: $19,575 over 3y, 12% of budgetARROWHEAD ARTS ASSOCIATION: $12,634 over 2y, 3.8% of budgetMOUNTAIN COMMUNITIES BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB: $10,925 over 3y, 0.8% of budgetRonald McDonald House Global: $10,200 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMOUNTAINS COMMUNITY HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $9,499 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetCSUSB PHILANTHROPIC FOUNDATION: $5,805 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetOPERATION PROVIDER: $5,178 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetROTARY CLUB OF CRESTLINE LAKE GREGORY: $2,500 over 1y, 7.6% of budgetHearts & Lives: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMOUNTAIN HOMELESS COALITION: $1,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Inland Empire Communi…Amazonsmile Foundation
Inland Empire Community FoundationCA13.2× affinity4 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Inland Empire Community Foundation · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Lake Arrowhead Rotary Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Lake Arrowhead Rotary Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 19 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Lake Arrowhead Rotary’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home