· Public charity
Lake Arrowhead Rotary Foundation
The organization raises money in the community in order to fund local charities and provide scholarships to the youth of the area.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 10 grants below total $21,450 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $45,550 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $24,100 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| RIM OF THE WORLD BLUE STAR MOMS CALIFORNIA CHAPTER #25 | $3,750 |
| REBUILDING TOGETHER MOUNTAIN COMMUNITIES | $3,000 |
| ROTARY CLUB OF CRESTLINE-LAKE GREGORY | $2,500 |
| SAN BERNARDINO MOUNTAINS LAND TRUST | $2,500 |
| RIM OF THE WORLD VETERANS OUTREACH | $2,500 |
| HAFDRA | $2,500 |
| BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF THE MOUNTAIN COMMUNITIES | $2,000 |
| MOUNTAIN HOMELESS COALITION | $1,000 |
| HEARTS & LIVES | $1,000 |
| MT CALVARY LUTHERAN CHURCH | $700 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 100% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +71% since the first grant, against +6% for the ones you funded once.
6 repeat relationships — 2 still active in FY2025, 4 since wound down; 8 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 23% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $16k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- RORIM OF THE WORLD EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION3× · 2018–2023 · $22k · revenue +118%
- RMRonald McDonald House Global2× · 2020–2022 · $10k · revenue +82%
- MCMOUNTAINS COMMUNITY HOSPITAL FOUNDATION2× · 2023–2024 · $9k · revenue +71%
Funded once
- RORIM OF THE WORLD HIGH SCHOOL ASBone grant, 2018 · $8k
- MCMOUNTAINS COMMUNITY HOSPITALone grant, 2018 · $6k
- CPCSUSB PHILANTHROPIC FOUNDATIONone grant, 2017 · $6k · revenue +6%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The mission of Mountain Health & Community Services is to improve the health and well being of the whole person.
To unite agencies, groups and individuals whose interests include protecting and enhancing Mountain County water resources throughout the foreseeable future.
Assist local food pantries and Meals on Wheels in providing canned, prepackaged and boxed food. In addition, the Foundation was formed to provide student scholarships and for other purposes established by the Board of Directors for the Big…
Support of, and advocacy for, the Mt. Lookout neighborhood of Cincinnati, OH
To provide food to disadvantaged individuals and families.
Rocky mountain youth corps engages young people in the outdoors, inspiring them to use their strengths and potential to lead healthy, productive lives. we teach responsibility for self, community, and environment through teamwork, service,…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Ronald McDonald House Global and the most unlike its peers is Dr Raymond V Mundall Family Humanitarian Aid for Development. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 19 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds RIM OF THE WORLD EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds REBUILDING TOGETHER-MOUNTAIN COMMUNITIES ↗
- Who funds ARROWHEAD ARTS ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds MOUNTAIN COMMUNITIES BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB ↗
- Who funds Ronald McDonald House Global ↗
- Who funds MOUNTAINS COMMUNITY HOSPITAL FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds CSUSB PHILANTHROPIC FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds OPERATION PROVIDER ↗
- Who funds ROTARY CLUB OF CRESTLINE LAKE GREGORY ↗
- Who funds SAN BERNARDINO MOUNTAINS LAND TRUST ↗
- Who funds DR RAYMOND V MUNDALL FAMILY HUMANITARIAN AID FOR DEVELOPMENT ↗
- Who funds MOUNTAIN HOMELESS COALITION ↗
- Who funds Hearts & Lives ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Inland Empire Community Foundation · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Lake Arrowhead Rotary Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.