Skip to content

· Public charity

Lake Area United Way Inc

Uniting people and resources to advance the health, education, and financial stability of our communities.

$308k
Granted FY2023
15
Grants FY2023
1
States reached
$39k
Largest
01What it funds
0178% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2023.

Human Services$552kPublic Safety & Disaster$287kArts & Culture$242kCrime & Legal$225kYouth Development$221kHousing & Shelter$71kHealth$39kOther$0
02FY2023 · 15 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 15 grants below total $283,244, the rows itemized in this filing. The $307,978 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $24,734 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2023

  • Under $10k5 grants · $42k
  • $10k–50k10 grants · $241k
$19,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$1.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
KELLY B TODD CP & NEUROMUSCULAR CE$39,002
Individual grant recipient$30,000
WOMEN IN SAEE HOME$27,494
Individual grant recipient$26,050
DOLLY PARTON IMAGINATION LIBRARY$24,998
AMERICAN RED CROSS$21,502
LEGAL SERVICES OF EASTERN OK$20,000
MUSKOGEE CO COUNCIL OF YOUTH SERVIC$19,000
LEGAL AID SERVICES OF OKLAHOMA$19,000
VOLUNTEERS OF AMERICA$14,154
OK UNITED METHODIST CIRCLE OF CARE$9,998
BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF TAHLEQUAH INC$9,998
RISE$9,500
Individual grant recipient$7,546
GIRL SCOUTS OF EASTERN OKLAHOMA$5,002
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY22–23, $40k) land where the poverty rate runs at 19%, against an area that typically sits at 15%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 15%RISE: $10k → 19%WOMEN IN SAFE HOME: $31k → 19%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

88%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.8M · 18 repeat orgs$248k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +138% since the first grant, against +16% for those funded once.

18 repeat relationships: 7 still active in FY2023, 11 since wound down; 8 grantees were first funded in FY2023 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

18
5

Total granted

$1.8M
$103k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+138%
+16%

Still filing today

11%
40%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 49% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $145k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23
Youth DevelopmentHuman ServicesCrime & LegalHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    8× · 2017–2024 · $201k
  • AR
    AMERICAN RED CROSS
    8× · 2017–2024 · $185k
  • KB
    KELLY B TODD CENTER
    5× · 2017–2021 · $182k

Funded once

  • DP
    DOLLY PARTIN IMAGINATION LIBRARY
    one grant, 2022 · $37k
  • WI
    WOMEN IN SAFE HOME INC DBA WISH
    one grant, 2022 · $31k · revenue +16%
  • MC
    MUSKOGEE COUNTY COUN OF YOUTH SER
    one grant, 2022 · $19k · revenue -1%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Okmulgee County Family Resource Ctr

Crisis intervention services and full shelter for victims and their children of domestic violence/sexual assault. Advocates for abused children in the court system.

Human Services
2
Still She Rises Inc

Legal representation and advocacy on behalf of mother and caregivers in Tulsa County facing criminal or misdemeanor charges, civil court and some juvenile cases.

Crime & Legal
3
Casa of Western Oklahoma Casa of Western Oklahoma

The organization's mission is to supervise volunteers primarily to serve as court appointed special advocates for abused and neglected children and support the needs of the children served.

Human Services
4
Okmulgee-Okfuskee County Youth Services

To shelter and improve the quality of life for children, youth, and families in the corporations service area by addressing mental health needs through direct services of shelter, consultation, counseling, and education.

Crime & Legal
5
Boys & Girls Club of Chelsea Inc

Boys and girls club of chelsea inc is an oklahoma nonprofit corporation whose purpose is to provide educational, personal development for the general public to prevent child abuse.

Youth Development
6
Oklahoma Lawyers for Children Inc

To provide legal service and education advocacy for children

Crime & Legal
7
Big Brothers Big Sisters of Oklahoma Inc

Create and support one-to-one mentoring relationships that ignite the power and promise of youth.

Human Services
8
Oklahoma Alternative Resources

Provide assistance to those in bona fide need of legal help relating to domestic violence.

Crime & Legal
9
Family Crisis Center Inc

The family crisis center provides intervention and advocacy for victims of sexual assault and domestic violence. this is done with counselors, court advocates and 24 hour shelter for victims and their children.

Human Services
10
Okmulgee County Homeless Shelter Inc

To promote the welfare of okmulgee county by providing temporary shelter and food for homeless and destitute persons

Human Services
11
Panhandle Services for Children

Provides mental health services, case management, and placement services and prevention and educaiton programs to youth and families in the oklahoma panhandle.

Housing & Shelter
12
Missing and Murdered Indigenous People Central Oklahoma Chapter
Civil Rights
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Boys & Girls Clubs of Tahlequah Ok; the most unlike its peers is Rise Corp. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 31 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
7/8
Grantees still filing
5/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Individual grant recipient: $200,997 · OtherIndividual grant recipientAMERICAN RED CROSS: $185,287 · OtherAMERICAN RED CROSSKELLY B TODD CENTER: $181,719 · OtherKELLY B TODD CENTERIndividual grant recipient: $166,884 · OtherIndividual grant recipientWISH: $145,473 · OtherWISHVOLUNTEERS OF AMERICA INC: $102,060 · OtherVOLUNTEERS OF AMERICA INCMCCOYS: $90,390 · OtherTHE DOLLYWOOD FOUNDATION: $90,296 · OtherDOLLY PARTON IMAGINATION LIBR: $89,672 · OtherLEGAL SERVICES OF EASTERN OK: $84,740 · OtherHOPE HOUSE OF CHEROKEE COUNTY INC: $70,954 · Other+14 more: $469,922 · Other+14 moreLEGAL AID SERVICES OF OKLAHOMA INC: $140,750 · Crime & LegalWOMEN IN SAFE HOME INC DBA WISH: $30,770 · Human ServicesRISE CORP: $9,500 · Human ServicesMUSKOGEE COUNTY COUN OF YOUTH SER: $19,497 · HealthBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF TAHLEQUAH OK: $9,998 · Youth DevelopmentGIRL SCOUTS OF EASTERN OKLAHOMA INC: $5,002 · Youth Development
Other$1,878,394Crime & Legal$140,750Human Services$40,270Health$19,497Youth Development$15,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetLEGAL AID SERVICES OF OKLAHOMA INC: $140,750 over 8y, 0.2% of budgetTHE DOLLYWOOD FOUNDATION: $90,296 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetHOPE HOUSE OF CHEROKEE COUNTY INC: $70,954 over 6y, 67% of budgetWOMEN IN SAFE HOME INC DBA WISH: $30,770 over 1y, 3.4% of budgetMUSKOGEE COUNTY COUN OF YOUTH SER: $19,497 over 1y, 1.9% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF TAHLEQUAH OK: $9,998 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetRISE CORP: $9,500 over 2y, 5.0% of budgetGIRL SCOUTS OF EASTERN OKLAHOMA INC: $5,002 over 2y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds LEGAL AID SERVICES OF OKLAHOMA INC ↗
  • Who funds THE DOLLYWOOD FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds HOPE HOUSE OF CHEROKEE COUNTY INC ↗
  • Who funds WOMEN IN SAFE HOME INC DBA WISH ↗
  • Who funds MUSKOGEE COUNTY COUN OF YOUTH SER ↗
  • Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF TAHLEQUAH OK ↗
  • Who funds RISE CORP ↗
  • Who funds GIRL SCOUTS OF EASTERN OKLAHOMA INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Sarkeys FoundationOK13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Sarkeys Foundation · Arvest Foundation · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Lake Area United Way Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Lake Area United Way Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%5%19%42%75%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →median 13%
  • Legal Aid Services of Oklahoma Inc: 13% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 31 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2023, released 2023. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2024) is on record and reports $496k of grant expense, but none of it to a named recipient. On a Form 990 that can mean grants abroad, filed by region only (Schedule F), grants under $5,000, which are not itemized, or a schedule referenced as an attachment the e-file does not carry. The figures above are therefore from FY2023, the most recent year this funder named its grantees.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Lake Area United Way’s filings →

More from the funding graph