Skip to content

· Private foundation

Lafon Family Foundation Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$54k
Granted FY2024still arriving
5
Grants FY2024still arriving
3
States reached
$40k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Education$258kFood & Nutrition$48kHealth$40kYouth Development$39kRecreation & Sports$12kHuman Services$10kReligion$9kMembership Benefit$7kOther$0
02FY2024 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k4 grants · $14k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $40k
$5,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$942k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
WVU FOUNDATION$40,000
CLEVELAND CLINIC FOUNDATION$5,000
HUNGRY LAMB FOOD INITIATIVE INC$5,000
TERRA COTTA GOLF CHARITIES$3,000
BOONE COUNTY CHAPTER OF THE WEST VIRGINIA UNIVERSITY ALUMNI ASSOCIATION$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 19%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 82% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%DOUBLE H RANCH: $2k → 10%ARTIS - NAPLES: $5k → 10%FGCU Gold Program: $1k → 11%Help Ministries: $5k → 11%1ST BAPTIST CHURCH: $2k → 18%Hero House: $4k → 19%Valley High School Varsity Football Booster Club: $2k → 20%Hungry Lamb Food Initiative Inc: $10k → 26%Double H Ranch: $2k → 10%NORTH NAPLES UNITED METHODIST CHURCH: $2k → 10%RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE: $10k → 18%Hero House: $2k → 19%HUNGRY LAMB FOOD INITIATIVE INC: $8k → 26%TERRA COTTA GOLF CHARITIES: $3k → 10%Buckskin Council BSA: $15k → 18%Boone County WVU Alumni Chapter: $3k → 19%Hungry Lamb Food Initiative Inc: $8k → 26%TERRA COTTA CHARITIES: $2k → 10%Buckskin Council BSA: $15k → 18%West Virginia University Alumni Association Boone County Chapter: $3k → 19%HUNGRY LAMB FOOD INITIATIVE INC: $8k → 26%TERRA COTTA CHARITIES: $2k → 10%Chief Cornstalk Council BSA: $4k → 18%Boone County WVU Alumni Chapter: $3k → 19%Hungry Lamb Food Initiative Inc: $5k → 26%Terra Cotta Charities: $2k → 10%CHIEF CORNSTALK COUNCILBUCKSKIN COUNCEL BSA: $3k → 18%West Virginia University Alumni Association Boone County Chapter: $3k → 19%Hungry Lamb Food Initiative Inc: $5k → 26%Terra Cotta Charities: $1k → 10%Recovery Point: $500 → 18%BOONE COUNTY WVU ALUMNI CHAPTER: $1k → 19%HUNGRY LAMB FOOD INITIATIVE INC: $5k → 26%CHIEF CORNSTALK COUNCILBUCKSKIN COUNCEL BSA: $3k → 18%BOONE COUNTY CHAPTER OF THE WEST VIRGINIA UNIVERSITY ALUMNI ASSOCIATION: $1k → 19%BOONE COUNTY WVU ALUMNI CHAPTER: $1k → 19%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 98% of Lafon Family Foundation Inc’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 87% of the giving stays in WV; by stated purpose, 64%.

Lafon Family Foundation Inclessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

92%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$392k · 10 repeat orgs$35k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +109% since the first grant, against +61% for those funded once.

10 repeat relationships: 3 still active in FY2024, 7 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

10
9

Total granted

$392k
$31k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+109%
+61%

Still filing today

40%
22%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 93% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $4k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Recreation & SportsEducationFood & NutritionHealthHousing & ShelterArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • WV
    WEST VIRGINIA UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $251k · revenue +5%
  • HL
    Hungry Lamb Food Initiative
    7× · 2017–2024 · $48k · revenue +109%
  • HH
    HERO HOUSE
    2× · 2018–2020 · $6k · revenue +136%

Funded once

  • RM
    RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE
    one grant, 2021 · $10k
  • AI
    ARTIS-NAPLES INC
    one grant, 2023 · $5k · revenue -3%
  • HM
    HELP MINISTRIES INC
    one grant, 2019 · $5k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Hope in the Hills Incorporated Healing Appalachia

Our mission is to end addiction in Appalachia through events that support substance abuse prevention and recovery programs.

Environment
2
Harmony Home of Huntington Inc

To offer recovery to alchoholics and drug addicts through a 12-step program and to provide a safe place for men to acquire sobriety.

Human Services
3
Southern Wv Felllowship Home Inc

The southern west virginia fellowship home is here to serve all in need of a better life apart from drugs and alcohol. we have a confident expectation that a whole new life "a better life" exists for all.

—
4
Wabash Valley Recovery Center
Health
5
Recovery Group of Swv Inc

To bring sober living to the local community

Health
6
Wv Helping Hands
Human Services
7
Higher Ground & Womens Recovery Residence

Our mission is to provide a supportive and nurturing environment for women in recovery from substance use disorder as they rebuild their lives, cultivate healthy habits, and thrive in sobriety. Through personalized care plans, life skills…

Human Services
8
West Virginia Pharmacist Recovery Network

To identify and monitor health professionals that suffer from impairments for the west virginia parmacist recovery network .

—
9
The Olive Tree Sober Living
—
10
Wheeling Hospital Inc

Wheeling Hospital, Inc. is a Catholic hospital that serves as a health ministry, providing compassionate care to people of all faiths in a loving, spiritual environment. God gives us the responsibility to carry out his mission of healing…

Health
11
Governors One Shot Inc
Food & Nutrition
12
River Bend Recovery

A faith-based, sober living house, for men who are serious about maintaining a life of sobriety from addictive substances.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Double H Hole in the Woods Ranch Inc; the most unlike its peers is Artis-Naples Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 21 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
7/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

WEST VIRGINIA UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC: $251,200 · EducationWEST VIRGINIA UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INCCleveland Clinic Foundation: $30,000 · OtherCleveland Clinic FoundationBuckskin Council BSA: $30,000 · OtherBuckskin Council BSARONALD MCDONALD HOUSE: $10,000 · OtherRONALD MCDONALD HOUSETERRA COTTA CHARITIES: $7,150 · OtherTERRA COTTA CHARITIESBoone County WVU Alumni Chapter: $7,000 · OtherBoone County WVU Alumni Chapt…CHIEF CORNSTALK COUNCILBUCKSKIN COUNCEL BSA: $5,000 · OtherWest Virginia University Alumni Association Boone County Chapter: $5,000 · OtherHELP MINISTRIES INC: $5,000 · OtherChief Cornstalk Council BSA: $4,000 · Other+5 more: $7,500 · Other+5 moreHungry Lamb Food Initiative: $47,500 · Food & NutritionHungry Lamb …DOUBLE H HOLE IN THE WOODS RANCH INC: $3,500 · Recreation & SportsTERRA COTTA GOLF CHARITIES INC: $3,000 · Recreation & SportsHERO HOUSE: $5,500 · HealthARTIS-NAPLES INC: $5,000 · Arts & CultureTHE RECOVERY POINT OF HUNTINGTON INC: $500 · Housing & Shelter
Education$251,200Other$110,650Food & Nutrition$47,500Recreation & Sports$6,500Health$5,500Arts & Culture$5,000Housing & Shelter$500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetWEST VIRGINIA UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC: $251,200 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetHungry Lamb Food Initiative: $47,500 over 7y, 7.5% of budgetARTIS-NAPLES INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDOUBLE H HOLE IN THE WOODS RANCH INC: $3,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTERRA COTTA GOLF CHARITIES INC: $3,000 over 1y, 3.1% of budgetBoone County Chapter of the West Virginia University Alumni Asc: $1,000 over 1y, 2.9% of budgetTHE RECOVERY POINT OF HUNTINGTON INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds WEST VIRGINIA UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds Hungry Lamb Food Initiative ↗
  • Who funds HERO HOUSE ↗
  • Who funds ARTIS-NAPLES INC ↗
  • Who funds DOUBLE H HOLE IN THE WOODS RANCH INC ↗
  • Who funds TERRA COTTA GOLF CHARITIES INC ↗
  • Who funds Boone County Chapter of the West Virginia University Alumni Asc ↗
  • Who funds THE RECOVERY POINT OF HUNTINGTON INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Donor Advised Charitable Giving IncCO6.2× affinity5 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Lafon Family Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Lafon Family Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Lafon Family Foundation Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Lafon Family Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 21 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Lafon Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph