Skip to content

· Private foundation

La Brasada Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$3.0M
Granted FY2024still arriving
19
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$2.0M
Largest
01What it funds
0195% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Education$6.0MHealth$3.7MReligion$3.2MFood & Nutrition$2.0MArts & Culture$1.1MAnimals$1.1MSocial Science$250kRecreation & Sports$111kOther$0
02FY2024 · 19 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k3 grants · $11k
  • $10k–50k9 grants · $115k
  • $50k–250k4 grants · $350k
  • $250k+3 grants · $2.5M
$10,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$15M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
TSCRA Leadership Development Foundation$2,000,000
Remember the Alamo Foundation$250,000
The Episcopal Diocese of West Texas$250,000
The Rey Feo Scholarship Fund$150,000
South Texas Recovery Foundation$100,000
Forgotten Angels$50,000
Charity Ball Ass of San Antonio$50,000
Sky High for Kids$25,000
Witte Museum$20,000
Majesty Outdoors$10,000
Texas Brigades$10,000
St Frances by the Lake Episcopal Church$10,000
Texas Southwestern Cattle Raisers Foundation$10,000
Sabinal Alumni$10,000
South Texas Children's Home Ministries$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY24–24, $50k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%Forgotten Angels: $50k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

59%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$11M · 22 repeat orgs$7.2M to everyone else

22 repeat relationships: 8 still active in FY2024, 14 since wound down; 11 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

22
33

Total granted

$11M
$4.9M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+13%
+54%

Still filing today

45%
39%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 24% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2.3M went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationHealthArts & CultureFood & NutritionEnvironmentPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • PV
    PARKINSON VOICE PROJECT INC
    5× · 2017–2022 · $2.0M · revenue +84%
  • TU
    Trinity University
    2× · 2022–2023 · $1.1M · revenue +12%
  • TH
    THE HERITAGE FAMILY SCHOOL
    3× · 2021–2023 · $175k · revenue ×112

Funded once

  • ET
    EPISCOPAL THEOLOGICAL SEMINARY OF THE SOUTHWEST
    one grant, 2019 · $1.0M
  • TA
    Texas A&M Foundationgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $1.0M · revenue +54%
  • SA
    San Antonio Academy
    one grant, 2019 · $1.0M
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Texas a&M Research Foundation

To facilitate research and development within the texas a&m university system and selected other entities.

Education
2
Texas a&M University-Central Tx Foundati

Operated exclusively for educational purposes specifically including to further educational activities at texas a& m university-central texas within the meaning of 501(c)(3).

Education
3
Texas Business Hall of Fame Foundation

To recognize the accomplishments and contributions of our outstanding Texas business leaders and to perpetuate and inspire the values of entrepreneurial spirit, personal integrity, and community leadership in all generations of Texans.

Community Improvement
4
Big Thicket Natural Heritage Trust

We acquire properties to be donated to the National Park Service and state entities and advocate for protection of Big Thicket natural resources.

Environment
5
The University of TexasTexas a&M Investment Management Company

To generate superior long-term investment returns to support The University of Texas and Texas A&M University systems as they provide world-class teaching, push the boundaries of discovery, and achieve excellence in patient healthcare for…

Education
6
Texas & Southwestern Cattle Raisers Association

To improve the cattle raising industry in texas and the southwest through education, market inspection, law enforcement and other member services.

—
7
Texas Land Trust Council

To support texas land trusts and promote land conservation efforts in texas. host texas land conservation conference to educate conservation related professionals and volunteers from across the state.

Environment
8
Baylor Oral Health Foundation

The baylor oral health foundation was established to foster and support the activities and program of the texas a&m university college of dentistry (the college) to provide financial support for excellence at the college, and to advance…

Health
9
Texas Academy of Medicine Engineering Science and Technology

To provide broader recognition of the state's top achievers in medicine, engineering and science, and to build a stronger identity for texas as an important destination and center of achievement in these fields.

Health
10
Texas Association of Business

As the state chamber of commerce, tab is the most influential and dominant voice for public policy issues affecting business in texas. through proven results-oriented advocacy and member services, tab develops a climate in texas which…

—
11
Tarrant County Bar Association

The association exists to advance the science of jurisprudence; to facilitate and improve the administration of justice; to maintain and to elevate standards of professional conduct; to increase professional skills through regular…

—
12
Parks and Wildlife Foundation of Texas

Texas Parks and Wildlife Foundation (TPWF) is a 501(c)3 nonprofit organization thatadvances Texas proud outdoor traditions through meaningful, high-impact programs,partnerships, and a wide range of projects that conserve and enhance our…

Environment
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Texas & Southwestern Cattle Raisers' Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Sabinal Alumni. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

29 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 29 of the 66 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
7
Early backer (in before they grew)
29/29
Grantees still filing
15/29
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

DIOCESE OF WEST TEXAS: $2,000,000 · OtherDIOCESE OF WEST TEXASST STEPHENS EPISCOPAL SCHOOL: $1,150,000 · OtherST STEPHENS EPISCOPAL SCHOOLEPISCOPAL THEOLOGICAL SEMINARY OF THE SOUTHWEST: $1,000,000 · OtherEPISCOPAL THEOLOGICAL SEMINARY OF THE SOUTHWESTSan Antonio Academy: $1,000,000 · OtherSan Antonio AcademyTEXAS MILITARY INSTITUTE: $1,000,000 · OtherTEXAS MILITARY INSTITUTETexas Wildlife Association Foundation Inc: $1,000,000 · OtherTexas Wildlife Association Foundation IncAUTISM SERVICE CENTER OF SAN ANTONIO DBA AUTISM COMMUNITY NETWORK: $810,000 · OtherAUTISM SERVICE CENTER OF SAN ANTONIO DBA AUTISM COMMUNITY NETWORKTexas Biomedical Research Campaign: $510,000 · Other+39 more: $1,897,000 · Other+39 moreTrinity University: $1,090,000 · EducationTrinity Universi…Texas A&M Foundation: $1,000,000 · EducationTexas A&M Founda…THE HERITAGE FAMILY SCHOOL: $175,000 · EducationTHE HERITAGE FAM…Alpine Public Library Association Inc: $100,000 · EducationTEXAS STATE UNIVERSITY DEVELOPMENT FOUNDATION: $100,000 · EducationBEYOND BATTEN DISEASE FOUNDATION: $100,000 · Education+1 more: $30,000 · EducationPARKINSON VOICE PROJECT INC: $2,000,000 · HealthPARKINSON VOI…SOUTH TEXAS RECOVERY FOUNDATION INCORPORATED: $100,000 · Health+2 more: $90,000 · HealthTSCRA LEADERSHIP DEVELOPMENT FOUNDATION: $2,000,000 · Food & NutritionTSCRA LEADERS…+1 more: $50,000 · Food & NutritionRemember the Alamo Foundation: $275,000 · Arts & CultureWitte Museum: $78,000 · Arts & Culture+2 more: $20,000 · Arts & CultureMAJESTY OUTDOORS: $83,500 · Youth DevelopmentST BENEDICTS WORKSHOP: $75,000 · Religion
Other$10,367,000Education$2,595,000Health$2,190,000Food & Nutrition$2,050,000Arts & Culture$373,000Youth Development$83,500Religion$75,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTSCRA LEADERSHIP DEVELOPMENT FOUNDATION: $2,000,000 over 1y, 93% of budgetPARKINSON VOICE PROJECT INC: $2,000,000 over 5y, 14% of budgetTrinity University: $1,090,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetTexas A&M Foundation: $1,000,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetAUTISM SERVICE CENTER OF SAN ANTONIO DBA AUTISM COMMUNITY NETWORK: $810,000 over 2y, 12% of budgetRemember the Alamo Foundation: $275,000 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetTHE HERITAGE FAMILY SCHOOL: $175,000 over 3y, 1.9% of budgetSOUTH TEXAS RECOVERY FOUNDATION INCORPORATED: $100,000 over 1y, 18% of budgetAlpine Public Library Association Inc: $100,000 over 1y, 23% of budgetTEXAS STATE UNIVERSITY DEVELOPMENT FOUNDATION: $100,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetBEYOND BATTEN DISEASE FOUNDATION: $100,000 over 1y, 4.9% of budgetMAJESTY OUTDOORS: $83,500 over 8y, 2.4% of budgetWitte Museum: $78,000 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetST BENEDICTS WORKSHOP: $75,000 over 2y, 16% of budgetSKY HIGH FOR KIDS INC: $70,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetTHE CHARITY BALL ASSOCIATION OF SAN ANTONIO INC: $50,000 over 1y, 2.4% of budgetForgotten Angels Inc: $50,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetTAMPA BAY NETWORK TO END HUNGER INC: $50,000 over 1y, 4.0% of budgetSABINAL ALUMNI: $30,000 over 3y, 12% of budgetGRAND CANYON CONSERVANCY: $25,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetTEXAS BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE: $20,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBobwhite Brigade: $10,000 over 1y, 1.8% of budgetTEXAS & SOUTHWESTERN CATTLE RAISERS' FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetHEMISFAIR CONSERVANCY: $10,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetBERKSHIRE CHORAL INTERNATIONAL INC: $10,000 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetTOMORROW'S HOPE FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 over 1y, 32% of budgetTOMORROWS HOPE FOUNDATION II INC: $3,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMcMullen Co Community Development Corp: $2,500 over 1y, 4.2% of budgetHILL COUNTRY CASA INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds TSCRA LEADERSHIP DEVELOPMENT FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds PARKINSON VOICE PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds Trinity University ↗
  • Who funds Texas A&M Foundation ↗
  • Who funds AUTISM SERVICE CENTER OF SAN ANTONIO DBA AUTISM COMMUNITY NETWORK ↗
  • Who funds Remember the Alamo Foundation ↗
  • Who funds THE HERITAGE FAMILY SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds SOUTH TEXAS RECOVERY FOUNDATION INCORPORATED ↗
  • Who funds Alpine Public Library Association Inc ↗
  • Who funds TEXAS STATE UNIVERSITY DEVELOPMENT FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds BEYOND BATTEN DISEASE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds MAJESTY OUTDOORS ↗
  • Who funds Witte Museum ↗
  • Who funds ST BENEDICTS WORKSHOP ↗
  • Who funds SKY HIGH FOR KIDS INC ↗
  • Who funds THE CHARITY BALL ASSOCIATION OF SAN ANTONIO INC ↗
  • Who funds Forgotten Angels Inc ↗
  • Who funds TAMPA BAY NETWORK TO END HUNGER INC ↗
  • Who funds SABINAL ALUMNI ↗
  • Who funds GRAND CANYON CONSERVANCY ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

San Antonio Area FoundationTX22.9× affinity9 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: San Antonio Area Foundation · Greater Houston Community Foundation · The Marshall Steves Foundation · Circle Bar Foundation · Charitable Foundation Frost F0359600 · Alice Kleberg Reynolds Meyer Foundat A0479800 · The Bh-Eh Foundation · Impetus Foundation · Nelson Puett Foundation · Mays Family Foundation · Betty Stieren Kelso Foundation · Nancy Smith Hurd Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization La Brasada Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from La Brasada Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government →median 1%
  • Berkshire Choral International Inc: 1% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to La Brasada Foundation?

Find your warmest path to La Brasada Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 66 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on La Brasada’s filings →

More from the funding graph