Skip to content
L Patrick & Marsha L Hassey Family Charitable Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

L Patrick & Marsha L Hassey Family Charitable Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$20k
Granted FY2025still arriving
10
Grants FY2025still arriving
7
States reached
$12k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Religion$160kEducation$43kHealth$39kHuman Services$8kFood & Nutrition$6kInternational$3kPhilanthropy$2kArts & Culture$500Other$0
02FY2025 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k9 grants · $8k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $12k
$1,000
Median grant
7
States reached
$619k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CHURCH OF JESUS CHRIST OF LDS$12,000
HUNTSMAN CANCER FOUNDATION$2,000
ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSP$1,000
WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT$1,000
TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION$1,000
UTAH FOOD BANK$1,000
ST JOSEPH'S INDIAN SCHOOL$500
CHRISTIAN APPALACHIAN PROJECT$500
SHRINERS CHILDREN'S$500
MERCY SHIPS$500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–25, $8k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 87% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $3k → 14%CHRISTIAN APPALACHIAN PROJECT: $500 → 26%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $2k → 14%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $1k → 14%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $1k → 14%CROSSROADS URBAN CENTER: $1k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NY
SD
CA
UT
KY
WV
VA
KS
TN
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

90%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$234k · 10 repeat orgs$26k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +50% since the first grant, against +11% for those funded once.

10 repeat relationships: 9 still active in FY2025, 1 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

10
12

Total granted

$234k
$26k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+50%
+11%

Still filing today

70%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 98% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $500 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’22’23’24’25
HealthHuman ServicesEducationPhilanthropyInternationalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • STEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION
    4× · 2020–2025 · $10k · revenue +392%
  • ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC
    4× · 2020–2025 · $7k · revenue +78%
  • WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC
    4× · 2020–2025 · $6k · revenue +50%

Funded once

  • SL
    SALT LAKE CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT
    one grant, 2022 · $10k
  • HA
    HABILITATION AND TRAINING SERVICES INCgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $7k · revenue +35%
  • UP
    UTAH'S PROMISE
    one grant, 2020 · $2k · revenue -56%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Utah Health Policy Project

To advance sustainable health care solutions for underserved utahns through better access, education, and public policy.

Health
2
United Children's Services of Bennington County Inc

Children's services

Human Services
3
The Uc Davis Foundation

The mission of the uc davis foundation is to secure, steward and manage private gifts for uc davis.

Education
4
Union Health System

To serve our communities by provding innovative and compassionate healthcare.

Health
5
University Health Inc

Primary functions are the coordination and delivery of health care resources and services, health care education for the hospital service area, long range analysis of health care needs and development of programs, and arranging for…

—
6
Global Partners in Care

The organization's mission is to build partnerships to enhance compassionate care globally. we are dedicated to improving access to hospice and palliative care worldwide.

International
7
University Hospital & Clinics Inc

The organization provides medical care to improve, maintain, and restore the health of the people in the communities we serve.

Health
8
Hmh Hospitals Corporation

The organization is committed to providing the full spectrum of life-enhancing care and services to create and sustain healthy, vibrant communities. please refer to schedule h, part vi, question 5 for the organization's community benefit…

Health
9
Good Samaritan Hospital Foundation

We, at ch, humbly join together to bring christ's healing mission and the mission of mercy of the catholic church expressed in catholic health care to our communities.

—
10
President and Fellows of Harvard College

Undergraduate, graduate, and professional education and research across a broad array of academic domains.

Education
11
El Paso Children's Hospital Corporation

To provide compassionate, coordinated, family-centered care for children with a dedicated commitment to excellent patient outcomes, inclusive leadership and innovative pediatric research and education.

Health
12
Cumberland Medical Center

Cumberland Medical Center provides quality healthcare, in alignment with Covenant Health's mission to serve the community by improving the quality of life through better health, regardless of the patient's ability to pay.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Wounded Warrior Project Inc; the most unlike its peers is Davis Education Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 23 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
14/14
Grantees still filing
8/14
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CHURCH OF JESUS CHRIST OF LDS: $157,800 · OtherCHURCH OF JESUS CHRIST OF LDSBRIGHAM YOUNG UNIVERSITY: $20,000 · OtherBRIGHAM YOUNG UNIVERSITYSALT LAKE CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT: $10,000 · OtherHABILITATION AND TRAINING SERVICES INC: $7,409 · Other+8 more: $12,000 · Other+8 moreHUNTSMAN CANCER FOUNDATION: $20,750 · HealthHUNTSMAN CANC…ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $7,000 · HealthST JUDE CHILD…SHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN: $2,000 · HealthSHRINERS HOSP…+1 more: $1,000 · HealthSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION: $9,500 · EducationWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $6,000 · Human ServicesCrossroads Urban Center: $1,000 · Human ServicesCHRISTIAN APPALACHIAN PROJECT INC: $500 · Human ServicesCOVENANT HOUSE: $500 · Human ServicesMercy Ships International: $3,000 · InternationalUTAH'S PROMISE: $1,500 · Philanthropy
Other$207,209Health$30,750Education$9,500Human Services$8,000International$3,000Philanthropy$1,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetHUNTSMAN CANCER FOUNDATION: $20,750 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION: $9,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetHABILITATION AND TRAINING SERVICES INC: $7,409 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $7,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $6,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetUTAH FOOD BANK: $5,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetMercy Ships International: $3,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetUTAH'S PROMISE: $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCrossroads Urban Center: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetPRADER-WILLI CALIFORNIA FOUNDATION: $1,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetDavis Education Foundation: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHRISTIAN APPALACHIAN PROJECT INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCOVENANT HOUSE: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Making a Difference F…American Endowment Fo…Donor Advised Charita…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
Making a Difference FoundationUT13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Making a Difference Foundation · American Endowment Foundation · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization L Patrick & Marsha L Hassey Family Charitable Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from L Patrick & Marsha L Hassey Family Charitable Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Wounded Warrior Project Inc: 0% of income from government
  • Shriners Hospitals for Children: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 23 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on L Patrick & Marsha L Hassey Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home