Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Kwoh & Pong Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$335k
Granted FY2024still arriving
6
Grants FY2024still arriving
3
States reached
$150k
Largest
01What you fund
0184% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172024.

Education$750kInternational$584kFood & Nutrition$422kPhilanthropy$385kSocial Science$20kHousing & Shelter$8kReligion$6kHealth$5kOther$0
02FY2024 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k1 grant · $500
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $35k
  • $50k–250k3 grants · $300k
$50,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$8.0M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
PEACH FOUNDATION$150,000
COMMUNITY PARTNERS INTERNATIONAL$100,000
COMMUNITY PARTNERS INTERNATIONAL$50,000
COMMUNITY PARTNERS INTERNATIONAL$24,500
LAN VO FOUNDATION$10,000
MISSION OF TAO$500
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY21–24, $509k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%COMMUNITY PARTNERS INTERNATIONAL: $200k → 10%LAN VO FOUNDATION: $10k → 9%COMMUNITY PARTNERS INTERNATIONAL: $100k → 10%LAN VO FOUNDATION: $10k → 9%COMMUNITY PARTNERS INTERNATIONAL: $100k → 10%LAN VO FOUNDATION: $5k → 9%COMMUNITY PARTNERS INTERNATIONAL: $50k → 10%LAN VO FOUNDATION: $5k → 9%COMMUNITY PARTNERS INTERNATIONAL: $25k → 10%COMMUNITY PARTNERS INTERNATIONAL: $5k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

99%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$2.1M · 14 repeat orgs$22k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +38% since the first grant, against +32% for the ones you funded once.

14 repeat relationships — 3 still active in FY2024, 11 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

14
3

Total granted

$2.1M
$21k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+38%
+32%

Still filing today

43%
67%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $500 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
HealthInternationalHuman ServicesEducationOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TP
    THE PEACH FOUNDATION
    6× · 2017–2024 · $750k · revenue +3%
  • CP
    COMMUNITY PARTNERS INTERNATIONAL
    4× · 2021–2024 · $479k · revenue +98%
  • TC
    THE CARTER CENTER INC
    2× · 2017–2018 · $55k · revenue +38%

Funded once

  • TC
    THE CARTER CENTER
    one grant, 2023 · $20k
  • AD
    ALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INCgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $500 · revenue +32%
  • BC
    BLOOD CANCER UNITED INC
    one grant, 2018 · $500 · revenue -18%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Charity Global Inc

Charity: water is a non-profit organization bringing clean and safe water to people around the world. continued on schedule o.

Human Services
2
Sanford Burnham Prebys Medical Discovery Institute

Sanford burnham prebys medical discovery institute's mission is to advance the biomedical sciences by cultivating the next generation of scientific leaders, providing meaningful opportunities for researchers of all backgrounds to learn,…

Health
3
Chartered Alternative Investment Analyst Association Inc

The chartered alternative investment analyst association, inc. (caia) is a global professional credentialing body dedicated to creating greater alignment, transparency, and knowledge for all investors, with a specific emphasis on…

Community Improvement
4
Clinton Health Access Initiative Inc

For over 20 years, chai's mission has been to save lives and improve health outcomes in low-and middle-income countries around the world. we do this by enabling the government and private sector to strengthen and sustain quality health…

International
5
The End Fund Inc

The END Fund's mission is to control and eliminate six neglected tropical diseases: river blindness, lymphatic filariasis, trachoma, schistosomiasis, intestinal worms, and visceral leishmaniasis.

International
6
Conservation International Foundation

Ci works to spotlight and secure the critical benefits that nature provides to humanity.

Environment
7
International Crisis Group

Crisis group works to prevent and resolve deadly conflict around the world by informing and influencing the perceptions and actions of policymakers and other key conflict actors. to this end, we endeavour to talk to all sides and provide…

International
8
Banner -University Medical Group

Assist banner health complete its mission to make health care easier so life can be better by providing integrated & coordinated care & population health management.

Health
9
Charities Aid Foundation America

Caf america's mission is to drive greater, and more impactful, philanthropic giving across the u.s. and world, connecting donors, individuals, families and corporations - with charities.

Philanthropy
10
The Freedom Fund

We identify and invest in the most effective frontline efforts to eradicate modern slavery in the countries and sectors where it is most prevalent. partnering with visionary investors, governments, anti-slavery organizations and those at…

Philanthropy
11
Banner Alzheimer's Foundation

Established in 2006, the banner alzheimer's foundation (baf) secures and stewards charitable gifts to advance the mission of banner alzheimer's institute (bai), including groundbreaking research initiatives and pioneering prevention…

Health
12
Actionaid Usa

Actionaid is an international network building a just, equitable, and sustainable world in solidarity with communities on the frontlines of poverty and injustice. actionaid usa is the u.s. branch of actionaid international, which works in…

Social Science

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Medecins Sans Frontieres Usa Inc and the most unlike its peers is Blood Cancer United Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 19 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
5/9
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

THE PEACH FOUNDATION — $749,500 · EducationTHE PEACH FOUNDATIONCOMMUNITY PARTNERS INTERNATIONAL — $479,000 · Human ServicesCOMMUNITY PARTNERS INTERN…The Lan Vo Foundation — $30,000 · Human ServicesThe Lan Vo FoundationCARE MISSION USA — $422,000 · HealthCARE MISSION USA+2 more — $1,000 · HealthSE ASIAN FOUNDATION — $175,000 · OtherSE ASIAN FOUND…LAN VO FOUNDATION — $42,000 · OtherLAN VO FOUNDAT…Individual grant recipient — $41,250 · OtherIndividual gra…THE CARTER CENTER — $20,000 · OtherTHE CARTER CEN…+6 more — $18,400 · Other+6 moreBANK OF AMERICA CHARITABLE GIFT FD — $180,000 · PhilanthropyBANK OF A…THE CARTER CENTER INC — $55,000 · InternationalMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC — $50,000 · International
Education$749,500Human Services$509,000Health$423,000Other$296,650Philanthropy$180,000International$105,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetTHE PEACH FOUNDATION — $749,500 over 6y, 16% of budgetCOMMUNITY PARTNERS INTERNATIONAL — $479,000 over 4y, 0.8% of budgetCARE MISSION USA — $422,000 over 6y, 24% of budgetTHE CARTER CENTER INC — $55,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC — $50,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetThe Lan Vo Foundation — $30,000 over 4y, 33% of budgetALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE PEACH FOUNDATION
  • Who funds COMMUNITY PARTNERS INTERNATIONAL
  • Who funds CARE MISSION USA
  • Who funds BANK OF AMERICA CHARITABLE GIFT FD
  • Who funds THE CARTER CENTER INC
  • Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC
  • Who funds The Lan Vo Foundation
  • Who funds ALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC
  • Who funds BLOOD CANCER UNITED INC

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a set of overlaps that mostly run through you, not between each other.

Amazonsmile FoundationWA2.4× affinity4 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Kwoh & Pong Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2023
202122232425
no gov · 10%3%10%23%40%your share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 19 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph