Skip to content

California · Private foundation

Kwoh & Pong Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$335k
Granted FY2024(still arriving)
6
Grants FY2024
6
Organizations funded FY2023
17%
First-time grantees FY2023
Read the full brief
Median grant, FY2024
$50,000
Largest grant, FY2024
$150,000
Organizations funded a year
4 to 13
FY2017 to FY2023
States reached, FY2024
3
Total assets, FY2024
$8.0M
Applications
Preselected organizations only
Per its most recent filing; check its own site

How open it is to new grantees

In FY2023, 17% of the organizations Kwoh & Pong Foundation funded were first-time grantees, receiving 6% of its grant dollars.

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 94% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $20k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23
Human ServicesHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
The numbers by year
Fiscal yearOrganizations fundedTo those organizationsFirst-time grantees
FY2024still arriving4$335k25%
FY20236$362k17%
FY20224$215k0%
FY20215$392k60%
FY20205$243k0%
FY20195$112k0%
FY201813$271k31%
FY20179$155kn/a
84% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Education$750kInternational$584kFood & Nutrition$422kPhilanthropy$385kSocial Science$20kHousing & Shelter$8kReligion$6kHealth$5kOther$0

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2017 to FY2024, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
The Peach Foundation$749,500616%
Community Partners International$479,00041%
Care Mission USA$422,000624%
The Carter Center Inc$55,00020%
Medecins Sans Frontieres USA Inc$50,00020%
The Lan Vo Foundation$30,000433%
South Bay Presbyterian Church$2,4003n/a
Mission of Tao-Confucianism Inc$1,5002n/a
Alzheimer's Disease & Related Disorders Association Inc$50010%
Blood Cancer United Inc$50010%

Plus 8 recipients with no EIN on record ($293k), not named here.

Where it is load-bearing

Kwoh & Pong Foundation supplied at least a quarter of the budget for 1 of its grantees at some point. The chart plots its 8 largest grantees; load-bearing ones sit top left.

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetThe Peach Foundation: $749,500 over 6y, 16% of budgetCommunity Partners International: $479,000 over 4y, 0.8% of budgetCare Mission USA: $422,000 over 6y, 24% of budgetThe Carter Center Inc: $55,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMedecins Sans Frontieres USA Inc: $50,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetThe Lan Vo Foundation: $30,000 over 4y, 33% of budgetAlzheimer's Disease & Related Disorders Association Inc: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBlood Cancer United Inc: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget

Tap a dot to name the grantee.

How this is measured
Share of budget is the funder’s grant in a year over the grantee’s total revenue that year, at its highest across the years we hold; revenue is from all sources. Only grantees confirmed against their own filings, whose grants do not exceed their revenue, are plotted: the largest 8.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a set of overlaps that mostly run through this funder rather than between each other.

Amazonsmile FoundationWA2.4× affinity4 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Compare Kwoh & Pong Foundation with peer funders

About Kwoh & Pong Foundation

How much does Kwoh & Pong Foundation give?
Kwoh & Pong Foundation reported 6 grants totaling $335,000 in its FY2024 IRS filing. It funded between 4 and 13 organizations a year over FY2017 to FY2023.
What does Kwoh & Pong Foundation fund?
By grant dollars over FY2017 to FY2024, its largest causes are Education (33%), International (26%), Food & Nutrition (19%).
Who are Kwoh & Pong Foundation's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2017 to FY2024: The Peach Foundation ($750k), Community Partners International ($479k), Care Mission USA ($422k).
Does Kwoh & Pong Foundation fund new organizations?
In FY2023, 17% of the organizations it funded were first-time grantees.
Does Kwoh & Pong Foundation accept unsolicited applications?
Its most recent filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and does not take unsolicited requests. Check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
Which funders back the same organizations as Kwoh & Pong Foundation?
Its strongest co-funders, measured against what their size predicts, include Amazonsmile Foundation.
Where is Kwoh & Pong Foundation based?
Kwoh & Pong Foundation is based in CA.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 19 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Kwoh & Pong’s filings →

More from the funding graph