· Private foundation
Kullman Family Foundation
Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2018–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k1 grant · $5k
- $10k–50k7 grants · $145k
- $50k–250k6 grants · $675k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA | $200,000 |
| JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY | $125,000 |
| TOWER HILL SCHOOL | $100,000 |
| BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF DELAWARE | $100,000 |
| HAGLEY MUSEUM & LIBRARY | $100,000 |
| DELAWARE ART MUSEUM | $50,000 |
| PARADIGM FOR PARITY INC | $35,000 |
| NATIVE EDUCATIONAL RESOURCES PROJECT INC | $30,000 |
| CENTER FOR REPRODUCTIVE RIGHTS | $25,000 |
| PHILABUNDANCE | $25,000 |
| LONGWOOD GARDENS INC | $10,000 |
| JOHNS HOPKINS BLOOMBERG SCHOOL OF PUBLIC HEALTH DEVELOPMENT | $10,000 |
| DELAWARE THEATRE COMPANY | $10,000 |
| WHITNEY MUSEUM OF AMERICAN ART | $5,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY21–25, $105k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +31% since the first grant, against 0% for the ones you funded once.
14 repeat relationships — 7 still active in FY2025, 7 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 52% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $300k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- THTOWER HILL SCHOOL ASSOCIATION7× · 2019–2025 · $1.0M · revenue +31%
Northwestern University5× · 2019–2024 · $500k · revenue +34%- DADELAWARE ART MUSEUM INC8× · 2018–2025 · $400k · revenue +2%
Funded once
- TDTHE DISCOVERY LAND COMPANY FOUNDATIONone grant, 2019 · $100k · revenue -83%
- UUUpstream USA Incone grant, 2019 · $100k · revenue -32%
- SJST JOSEPH ON THE BRANDYWINEone grant, 2022 · $75k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
See schedule o.we are inspired by the ideals of our founder who, in 1896, emphasized respect for all people and ideas, who honored knowledge with practice, progress and the common good. our historical commitment to experiential learning…
Research, education and general - princeton university is a private not-for-profit, non-sectarian institution of higher learning with approximately 5,700 undergraduate and 3,300 graduate students. 2,500 students graduated in the 2024-2025…
The university of delaware is a major research university dedicated to cultivating learning, advancing knowledge, and fostering the exchange of ideas through teaching, research and public service.
The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…
Delaware state university is a public, comprehensive, 1890 land-grant institution that offers access and opportunity to diverse populations from delaware, the nation, and the world. (continued on schedule o.)building on its heritage as a…
Depauw university develops leaders the world needs through an uncommon commitment to the liberal arts. depauw's diverse and inclusive learning and living experience, distinctive in its rigorous intellectual engagement and its global and…
Wilson college empowers students to be confident and critical thinkers, creative visionaries, effective communicators, honorable leaders, and agents of justice.
Provides innovative education in a dynamic urban setting. dedicated to academic excellence and community engagement,we prepare students of diverse backgrounds with the knowledge, skill,and experience to lead meaningful lives as informed…
Drexel university fulfills its founder's vision of preparing each new generation of students for productive professional and civic lives while also focusing its collective expertise on solving society's greatest problems. drexel is an…
The mission of rhode island school of design, through its college and museum,is to educate its students and the public in the creation and (see schedule o)appreciation of works of art and design, to discover and transmit knowledge and to…
Pidc plans and implements economic development initiatives (see schedule o) which enhance the competitive environment, generate jobs and produce higher tax ratables throughout philadelphia.
The university's goal in the coming decade is to advance learning through the integration of teaching, research and service to others. the core of this goal is to prepare graduates to engage with the world and lead lives of meaning. to do…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Boys & Girls Clubs of Delaware Inc and the most unlike its peers is Longwood Gardens Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 55 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 3% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
29 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 29 of the 39 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds TOWER HILL SCHOOL ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds TRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA ↗
- Who funds Northwestern University ↗
- Who funds DELAWARE ART MUSEUM INC ↗
- Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF DELAWARE INC ↗
- Who funds TEEN WAREHOUSE INC ↗
- Who funds JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds The Henry Francis du Pont Winterthur Museum Inc ↗
- Who funds DELAWARE THEATRE COMPANY ↗
- Who funds THE DISCOVERY LAND COMPANY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Eleutherian Mills-Hagley Foundation Inc ↗
- Who funds FOOD BANK OF DELAWARE INC ↗
- Who funds SERVIAM GIRLS ACADEMY INC ↗
- Who funds Upstream USA Inc ↗
- Who funds PARADIGM FOR PARITY ↗
- Who funds THE CENTER FOR REPRODUCTIVE RIGHTS INC ↗
- Who funds HIAS INC ↗
- Who funds NATIVE EDUCATIONAL RESOURCES PROJECT INC ↗
- Who funds Philabundance ↗
- Who funds COUNCIL ON FOREIGN RELATIONS INC ↗
- Who funds THOMAS JEFFERSON UNIVERSITY HOSPITALS INC ↗
- Who funds IOTA DEVELOPMENT FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds JEWISH FAMILY SERVICES OF DELAWARE INC ↗
- Who funds DELAWARE WILD LANDS INC ↗
- Who funds PRO PUBLICA INC ↗
- Who funds WHITNEY MUSEUM OF AMERICAN ART ↗
- Who funds ROBIN HOOD FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds LONGWOOD GARDENS INC ↗
- Who funds PRECISION INSTITUTE ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Delaware Community Foundation Inc · Longwood Foundation Inc · Laffey-McHugh Foundation · Marmot Foundation · Crestlea Foundation Inc · United Way of Delaware · Welfare Foundation Inc · Wakefield Family Fund Inc · Nor' Easter Foundation Inc · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · Stratus Foundation · Ellason Downs Perpetual Charitable Trust
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Kullman Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Hias Inc — 88% of income from government
- Boys & Girls Clubs of Delaware Inc — 33% of income from government
- Teen Warehouse Inc — 28% of income from government
- Food Bank of Delaware Inc — 26% of income from government
- Johns Hopkins University — 12% of income from government
- Delaware Theatre Company — 8% of income from government
- Delaware Art Museum Inc — 8% of income from government
- Upstream Usa Inc — 4% of income from government
- Serviam Girls Academy Inc — 2% of income from government
- Eleutherian Mills-Hagley Foundation Inc — 0% of income from government
- Tower Hill School Association — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.