Skip to content
Kuehn Truman C Tua at a glance

· Private foundation

Kuehn Truman C Tua

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$15k
Granted FY2025still arriving
3
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$6k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2025.

Food & Nutrition$24kAnimals$21kHuman Services$17kHealth$11kYouth Development$10kHousing & Shelter$8kEducation$5kArts & Culture$5k
02FY2025 · 3 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$5,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$258k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ASSISTANCE LEAGUE OF GREATER SAN DIEGO$6,000
ARTHATCH$5,000
CALIFORNIA LABRADORS RETRIEVERS AND MORE$4,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–25, $17k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%FOUNDATION FOR WOMEN WARRIORS: $6k → 14%ASSISTANCE LEAGUE OF GREATER SAN DIEGO: $6k → 11%ASSISTANCE LEAGUE OF GREATER SAN DIEGO: $5k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

44%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$44k · 4 repeat orgs$57k to everyone else

4 repeat relationships: 2 still active in FY2025, 2 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

4
9

Total granted

$44k
$52k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+1%
+30%

Still filing today

100%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 67% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $5k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesAnimalsEducationHealthYouth DevelopmentArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CL
    California Labradors Retrievers & More Rescue
    2× · 2024–2025 · $14k · revenue +1%
  • AL
    Assistance League of Greater San Diego
    2× · 2024–2025 · $11k · revenue -4%
  • GL
    GREATER LA JOLLA MEALS ON WHEELS INC
    3× · 2019–2023 · $10k · revenue +24%

Funded once

  • TA
    THE ALABASTER JAR PROJECT
    one grant, 2023 · $8k · revenue -4%
  • VF
    VOICE FOR THE ANIMALS
    one grant, 2021 · $7k · revenue -37%
  • FF
    FOUNDATION FOR WOMEN WARRIORSgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $6k · revenue +816%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Basket Brigade of San Diego

Focused on bringing holiday meals full of hope to families in need in the san diego area.

—
2
La Jolla Volleyball Inc

La Jolla Volleyball organizes and conducts volleyball teams and instruction for youth ages 7-18. Activities, including practices, instruction, games, CLINICS AND CAMPS, take place in the greater La Jolla area of San Diego, California, in…

Recreation & Sports
3
San Diego Fishermens Working Group

San Diego Fishermens Working Group is working to squarely place in the publics mind the importance of commercial fishing to our regions food security, and to the economic, social, and cultural fabric of the greater San Diego region. SDFWG…

Environment
4
Volunteer Center of San Gabriel Valley

Provide referrals for court mandated community service. offer meal delivery for home bound individuals.

Philanthropy
5
League of Women Voters of Los Angeles

The League of Women Voters, a nonpartisan political organization, encourages informed and active participation in government, works to increase understanding of major public policy issues, and influences public policy through education and…

—
6
All About Kids La
Philanthropy
7
Meals On Wheels-Santa Maria Valley Inc

Deliver meals and provide informal health and welfare visits to disabled and elderly clients in the Santa Maria Valley.

—
8
Golden State Humane Society

Affordable veterinary care, low-cost spay and neuter services, and pet parent education for the dogs and cats of Southern California.

Animals
9
New Door Opportunities

Feeding the homeless population in san d

Food & Nutrition
10
Central California Labrador Retriever Rescue

Dog rescue and adoption

Animals
11
Chula Vista Futbol Club

Our mission is to be the leader in the south bay by offering boys and girls ages 8 to 18 the opportunity to develop both socially and physically through the sport of soccer. to achieve this our coaches are licensed through us youth…

—
12
Liver Coalition of San Diego

To save lives by improving liver health and preventing liver disease through community based education, linkages to care, advocacy, and research programs.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Boys and Girls Club of Vista Inc; the most unlike its peers is ArtHatch. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
14/14
Grantees still filing
8/14
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

GREATER LA JOLLA MEALS ON WHEELS INC: $9,500 · OtherGREATER LA JOLLA MEALS ON WHEELS I…PALOMAR FAMILY COUNSELING SERVICE INC: $6,000 · OtherPALOMAR FAMILY COUNSELING SERVICE …KITCHENS FOR GOOD: $5,000 · OtherKITCHENS FOR GOODBOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF VISTA INC: $5,000 · OtherBOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF VISTA INCGENERATION STEAM: $5,000 · OtherGENERATION STEAMAssistance League of Greater San Diego: $11,000 · Human ServicesAssistance League of Greate…THE ALABASTER JAR PROJECT: $7,500 · Human ServicesTHE ALABASTER JAR PROJECTFOUNDATION FOR WOMEN WARRIORS: $6,000 · Human ServicesFOUNDATION FOR WOMEN WARRIO…California Labradors Retrievers & More Rescue: $14,000 · AnimalsCalifornia Labradors Re…VOICE FOR THE ANIMALS: $7,000 · AnimalsVOICE FOR THE ANIMALSSpecial Delivery San Diego: $9,000 · EducationSpecial De…BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF NORTHWEST SAN DIEGO COUNTY INC: $5,000 · Youth DevelopmentArtHatch: $5,000 · Arts & CultureAMERICAN ACADEMY OF PEDIATRICS: $5,000 · Health
Other$30,500Human Services$24,500Animals$21,000Education$9,000Youth Development$5,000Arts & Culture$5,000Health$5,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCalifornia Labradors Retrievers & More Rescue: $14,000 over 2y, 1.0% of budgetAssistance League of Greater San Diego: $11,000 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetGREATER LA JOLLA MEALS ON WHEELS INC: $9,500 over 3y, 2.6% of budgetSpecial Delivery San Diego: $9,000 over 2y, 2.3% of budgetTHE ALABASTER JAR PROJECT: $7,500 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetVOICE FOR THE ANIMALS: $7,000 over 1y, 3.8% of budgetFOUNDATION FOR WOMEN WARRIORS: $6,000 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetPALOMAR FAMILY COUNSELING SERVICE INC: $6,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF NORTHWEST SAN DIEGO COUNTY INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetKITCHENS FOR GOOD: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetArtHatch: $5,000 over 1y, 3.0% of budgetBOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF VISTA INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetAMERICAN ACADEMY OF PEDIATRICS: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGENERATION STEAM: $5,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The San Diego Foundat…The Cushman FoundationStafford Memorial Tr …French Fund Samuel Ka…Masserini Maurice J T…Boys and Girls Aid So…Pratt Memorial FundThe Parker FoundationDavid C Copley Founda…Rancho Santa Fe Found…Good360American Online Givin…
The San Diego FoundationCA21× affinity8 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The San Diego Foundation · The Cushman Foundation · Stafford Memorial Tr Found Tua · French Fund Samuel Katherine Tua · Masserini Maurice J Tua · Boys and Girls Aid Society of San Diego Ltd · Pratt Memorial Fund · The Parker Foundation · David C Copley Foundation · Rancho Santa Fe Foundation · Good360 · American Online Giving Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Kuehn Truman C Tua funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Kuehn Truman C Tua. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 14 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Kuehn Truman C Tua’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home