Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Kuehn Truman C Tua

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$15k
Granted FY2025still arriving
3
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$6k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20192025.

Food & Nutrition$24kAnimals$21kHuman Services$17kHealth$11kYouth Development$10kHousing & Shelter$8kEducation$5kArts & Culture$5k
02FY2025 · 3 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$5,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$258k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ASSISTANCE LEAGUE OF GREATER SAN DIEGO$6,000
ARTHATCH$5,000
CALIFORNIA LABRADORS RETRIEVERS AND MORE$4,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY19–25, $17k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%FOUNDATION FOR WOMEN WARRIORS: $6k → 14%ASSISTANCE LEAGUE OF GREATER SAN DIEGO: $6k → 11%ASSISTANCE LEAGUE OF GREATER SAN DIEGO: $5k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

44%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$44k · 4 repeat orgs$57k to everyone else

4 repeat relationships — 2 still active in FY2025, 2 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

4
9

Total granted

$44k
$52k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+1%
+30%

Still filing today

100%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 67% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $5k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesAnimalsEducationHealthYouth DevelopmentArts & CultureOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CL
    California Labradors Retrievers & More Rescue
    2× · 2024–2025 · $14k · revenue +1%
  • AL
    Assistance League of Greater San Diego
    2× · 2024–2025 · $11k · revenue -4%
  • GL
    GREATER LA JOLLA MEALS ON WHEELS INC
    3× · 2019–2023 · $10k · revenue +24%

Funded once

  • TA
    THE ALABASTER JAR PROJECT
    one grant, 2023 · $8k · revenue -4%
  • VF
    VOICE FOR THE ANIMALS
    one grant, 2021 · $7k · revenue -37%
  • PF
    PALOMAR FAMILY COUNSELING SERVICE INCgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $6k · revenue +30%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Basket Brigade of San Diego

Focused on bringing holiday meals full of hope to families in need in the san diego area.

2
La Jolla Volleyball Inc

La Jolla Volleyball organizes and conducts volleyball teams and instruction for youth ages 7-18. Activities, including practices, instruction, games, CLINICS AND CAMPS, take place in the greater La Jolla area of San Diego, California, in…

Recreation & Sports
3
San Diego Fishermens Working Group

San Diego Fishermens Working Group is working to squarely place in the publics mind the importance of commercial fishing to our regions food security, and to the economic, social, and cultural fabric of the greater San Diego region. SDFWG…

Environment
4
Volunteer Center of San Gabriel Valley

Provide referrals for court mandated community service. offer meal delivery for home bound individuals.

Philanthropy
5
League of Women Voters of Los Angeles

The League of Women Voters, a nonpartisan political organization, encourages informed and active participation in government, works to increase understanding of major public policy issues, and influences public policy through education and…

6
All About Kids La
Philanthropy
7
Meals On Wheels-Santa Maria Valley Inc

Deliver meals and provide informal health and welfare visits to disabled and elderly clients in the Santa Maria Valley.

8
Golden State Humane Society

Affordable veterinary care, low-cost spay and neuter services, and pet parent education for the dogs and cats of Southern California.

Animals
9
New Door Opportunities

Feeding the homeless population in san d

Food & Nutrition
10
Central California Labrador Retriever Rescue

Dog rescue and adoption

Animals
11
Chula Vista Futbol Club

Our mission is to be the leader in the south bay by offering boys and girls ages 8 to 18 the opportunity to develop both socially and physically through the sport of soccer. to achieve this our coaches are licensed through us youth…

12
Liver Coalition of San Diego

To save lives by improving liver health and preventing liver disease through community based education, linkages to care, advocacy, and research programs.

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Boys and Girls Club of Vista Inc and the most unlike its peers is ArtHatch. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
14/14
Grantees still filing
8/14
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

GREATER LA JOLLA MEALS ON WHEELS INC — $9,500 · OtherGREATER LA JOLLA MEALS ON WHEELS I…PALOMAR FAMILY COUNSELING SERVICE INC — $6,000 · OtherPALOMAR FAMILY COUNSELING SERVICE …KITCHENS FOR GOOD — $5,000 · OtherKITCHENS FOR GOODBOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF VISTA INC — $5,000 · OtherBOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF VISTA INCGENERATION STEAM — $5,000 · OtherGENERATION STEAMAssistance League of Greater San Diego — $11,000 · Human ServicesAssistance League of Greate…THE ALABASTER JAR PROJECT — $7,500 · Human ServicesTHE ALABASTER JAR PROJECTFOUNDATION FOR WOMEN WARRIORS — $6,000 · Human ServicesFOUNDATION FOR WOMEN WARRIO…California Labradors Retrievers & More Rescue — $14,000 · AnimalsCalifornia Labradors Re…VOICE FOR THE ANIMALS — $7,000 · AnimalsVOICE FOR THE ANIMALSSpecial Delivery San Diego — $9,000 · EducationSpecial De…BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF NORTHWEST SAN DIEGO COUNTY INC — $5,000 · Youth DevelopmentArtHatch — $5,000 · Arts & CultureAMERICAN ACADEMY OF PEDIATRICS — $5,000 · Health
Other$30,500Human Services$24,500Animals$21,000Education$9,000Youth Development$5,000Arts & Culture$5,000Health$5,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetCalifornia Labradors Retrievers & More Rescue — $14,000 over 2y, 1.0% of budgetAssistance League of Greater San Diego — $11,000 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetGREATER LA JOLLA MEALS ON WHEELS INC — $9,500 over 3y, 2.6% of budgetSpecial Delivery San Diego — $9,000 over 2y, 2.3% of budgetTHE ALABASTER JAR PROJECT — $7,500 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetVOICE FOR THE ANIMALS — $7,000 over 1y, 3.8% of budgetPALOMAR FAMILY COUNSELING SERVICE INC — $6,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetFOUNDATION FOR WOMEN WARRIORS — $6,000 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF NORTHWEST SAN DIEGO COUNTY INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetArtHatch — $5,000 over 1y, 3.0% of budgetAMERICAN ACADEMY OF PEDIATRICS — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetKITCHENS FOR GOOD — $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF VISTA INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetGENERATION STEAM — $5,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The San Diego FoundationCA21× affinity8 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The San Diego Foundation · The Cushman Foundation · Stafford Memorial Tr Found Tua · French Fund Samuel Katherine Tua · Masserini Maurice J Tua · Boys and Girls Aid Society of San Diego Ltd · Pratt Memorial Fund · The Parker Foundation · David C Copley Foundation · Rancho Santa Fe Foundation · Good360 · American Online Giving Foundation Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Kuehn Truman C Tua funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 14 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph