Skip to content

· Private foundation

Kubicki Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$32k
Granted FY2025still arriving
8
Grants FY2025still arriving
5
States reached
$8k
Largest
01What it funds
0196% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

International$25kHousing & Shelter$23kEducation$17kAnimals$17kYouth Development$9kHuman Services$9kHealth$6kPublic Safety & Disaster$5kOther$0
02FY2025 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$3,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$320k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
TUNNEL TO TOWERS$8,000
THE LORDS PLACE$7,000
ASPCA$6,000
WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT$3,000
MERCY SHIPS INTERNATIONAL$3,000
SAMARITANS PURSE$2,000
MERCY CHEFS$2,000
SMILE TRAIN INC$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY24–25, $8k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $3k → 14%MERCY CHEFS: $2k → 20%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $2k → 14%MERCY CHEFS: $1k → 20%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NY
IA
IN
CA
VA
MD
AZ
TN
NC
LA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

71%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$86k · 11 repeat orgs$36k to everyone else

11 repeat relationships: 7 still active in FY2025, 4 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

11
23

Total granted

$86k
$33k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+12%
+26%

Still filing today

73%
35%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 91% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $3k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
AnimalsHuman ServicesReligionEducationFood & NutritionHousing & ShelterOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SP
    SAMARITAN'S PURSE
    5× · 2020–2025 · $18k · revenue +106%
  • STEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION
    4× · 2020–2025 · $17k · revenue +392%
  • WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC
    2× · 2024–2025 · $5k · revenue +12%

Funded once

  • VF
    VOLUNTEER FL FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2022 · $5k
  • WR
    WORLD RELIEF CORP OF NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF EVANGELICALSgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $4k · revenue +26%
  • CH
    CAMILLUS HOUSE INCgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $4k · revenue +42%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Florida Pointer Rescue Inc

Rescue pointer dogs and treat back to health and f

Animals
2
Aerial Recovery

Aerial recovery's mission is to save lives and stop evil. through the creation and deployment of humanitarian special operators, aerial recovery brings together selected veterans, first responders, and mission-qualified civilians who,…

—
3
The San Francisco Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals

To ensure every companion animal has access to quality medical care, compassionate shelter, and a loving home.

Animals
4
World Animal Protection

World animal protection is a global organization working to end factory farming and wildlife exploitation. we expose cruel systems, promote animal-friendly alternatives, and influence policy change. for over 75 years, we've been rewriting…

Animals
5
Church World Service Inc

Church world service, inc. is a private, voluntary faith-based organization with 37 member communions that transformscommunities around the globe through just and sustainable responses to hunger, poverty, displacement and disaster.

International
6
Lucky Dog Animal Rescue

Lucky dog animal rescue is a volunteer-powered nonprofit dedicated to rescuing homeless, neglected, and abandoned animals from certain euthanasia and finding them loving forever homes. we educate the community and all pet owners on…

Animals
7
Jacksonville Humane Society Inc

The jacksonville humane society provides care, comfort and compassion to animals in need while engaging the hearts, hands and minds of our community to bring about an end to the killing of abandoned and orphaned shelter animals.

Animals
8
Management Sciences for Health Inc

(msh) saves lives and improves the health of the world's poorest (see schedule o) and most vulnerable people by closing the gap between knowledge and action in public health.

International
9
Hope for China Dogs Rescue

At Hope for China Dogs, we are committed to combating the cruel and inhumane practice of the dog meat trade in China. We believe that every dog deserves to live a life free from pain and suffering, and we are dedicated to rescuing and…

Animals
10
People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals Inc

Protection of animal rights

Animals
11
Humane Society Silicon Valley

At humane society silicon valley, our mission is to save lives, keep families together, and create a better future for pets and their people.(see schedule o for continuation)

Animals
12
Their Lives Matter

Dog rescue and care nurturing finding a home

Animals
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Wounded Warrior Project Inc; the most unlike its peers is Marrvelous Pet Rescues Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

17 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 17 of the 35 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
17/17
Grantees still filing
11/17
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

TUNNEL TO THE TOWERS: $8,000 · OtherTUNNEL TO THE TOWERSVOLUNTEER FL FOUNDATION: $5,000 · OtherVOLUNTEER FL FOUNDATIONCAMILLUS HOUSE INC: $4,000 · OtherCAMILLUS HOUSE INCBIG DOG RESCUE RANCH: $3,000 · OtherBIG DOG RESCUE RANCHMercy Ships International: $3,000 · OtherMercy Ships InternationalCHURCH OF THE EPIPHANY: $2,475 · OtherCHURCH OF THE EPIPHANYTHE CENTER FOR THE HOMELESS INC: $2,000 · OtherABCD: $2,000 · OtherSMILE TRAIN INC: $2,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $2,000 · OtherMARINE TOYS FOR TOTS FOUNDATION: $2,000 · OtherFEEDING SOUTH FLORIDA INC: $2,000 · OtherST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $2,000 · Other+12 more: $5,970 · Other+12 moreSAMARITAN'S PURSE: $18,000 · ReligionSAMARITAN'S PURS…THE LORD'S PLACE INC: $17,000 · Housing & ShelterTHE LORD'S PLAC…STEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION: $17,000 · EducationSTEPHEN SILLER …THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS: $11,000 · AnimalsTHE AMERICAN…K9S FOR WARRIORS INC: $1,000 · AnimalsK9S FOR WARR…LUCKY DOG RESCUE INC: $500 · AnimalsMARRVELOUS PET RESCUES INC: $500 · AnimalsWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $5,000 · Human ServicesMERCY CHEFS INC: $3,000 · Human ServicesWORLD RELIEF CORP OF NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF EVANGELICALS: $4,000 · International
Other$45,445Religion$18,000Housing & Shelter$17,000Education$17,000Animals$13,000Human Services$8,000International$4,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSAMARITAN'S PURSE: $18,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetTHE LORD'S PLACE INC: $17,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION: $17,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetTHE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS: $11,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $5,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetWORLD RELIEF CORP OF NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF EVANGELICALS: $4,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCAMILLUS HOUSE INC: $4,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMERCY CHEFS INC: $3,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMARINE TOYS FOR TOTS FOUNDATION: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CENTER FOR THE HOMELESS INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFEEDING SOUTH FLORIDA INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSMILE TRAIN INC: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetK9S FOR WARRIORS INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLUCKY DOG RESCUE INC: $500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetMARRVELOUS PET RESCUES INC: $500 over 1y, 0.3% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Paypal Charitable Giving FundDC9.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Kubicki Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Kubicki Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →median 5%
  • World Relief Corp of National Association of Evangelicals: 67% of income from government
  • The Lord's Place Inc: 12% of income from government
  • Feeding South Florida Inc: 5% of income from government
  • Camillus House Inc: 2% of income from government
  • Wounded Warrior Project Inc: 0% of income from government
  • K9S for Warriors Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 35 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Kubicki Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph