Skip to content

· Private foundation

Kropp Charitable Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$266k
Granted FY2025still arriving
27
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$50k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Recreation & Sports$245kEducation$228kArts & Culture$143kCommunity Improvement$111kHuman Services$93kEnvironment$60kHealth$37kPublic Safety & Disaster$35kOther$0
02FY2025 · 27 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k18 grants · $46k
  • $10k–50k7 grants · $119k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $100k
$3,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$2.8M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CITY OF NEBRASKA CITY$50,000
APACE$50,000
NEBRASKA CITY FIRE & RESCUE$35,000
NEBRASKA CITY VETERANS MEMORIAL$27,000
CITY OF NEBRASKA CITY CREATIVE$13,500
ST MARYS HOSPITAL FOUNDATION$12,000
NEBRASKA CITY PUBLIC SCHOOLS FOUND$11,350
Individual grant recipient$10,600
NEBRASKA CITY MUSEUM ASSOCIATION$10,000
NEBRASKA CITY FINE ARTS$6,800
PEOPLE UNITED FOR FAMILIES$6,000
NEBRASKA CITY BASEBALL ASSOCIATION$5,000
KREGEL WINDMILL MUSEUM$3,000
NC YOUTH TENNIS$3,000
CITY OF NEBRASKA CITY$3,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY25–25, $6k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%PEOPLE UNITED FOR FAMILIES: $6k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MN
IA
CO
NE
MO
VA
OK
GA
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

69%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$711k · 34 repeat orgs$316k to everyone else

34 repeat relationships: 9 still active in FY2025, 25 since wound down; 17 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

34
27

Total granted

$711k
$150k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+22%
+27%

Still filing today

29%
22%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 38% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $166k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationArts & CultureEnvironmentHealthYouth DevelopmentCommunity ImprovementOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • NA
    NATIONAL ARBOR DAY FOUNDATION
    4× · 2017–2020 · $40k · revenue +138%
  • HC
    HASTINGS COLLEGE
    5× · 2021–2025 · $6k · revenue +24%
  • CU
    CONCORDIA UNIVERSITY
    4× · 2017–2020 · $4k · revenue +19%

Funded once

  • GF
    GREAT Foundation NE City Area Economic Development Corporation
    one grant, 2022 · $25k
  • KN
    KEEP NEBRASKA CITY BEAUTIFUL
    one grant, 2023 · $20k
  • SM
    ST MARY'S COMMUNITY HOSPITALgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $20k · revenue +48%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Nebraska Academy of Sciences
Science & Tech
2
Union College

Union college is a seventh-day adventist community of higher education, inspired by jesus christ, and dedicated to empowering students to learn, serve, and lead.

Education
3
The Trustees of Grinnell College

To educate students in the liberal arts through free inquiry and the open exchange of ideas.when grinnell college framed its charter in the iowa territory of the united states in 1846, it set forth a mission to educate its students "for…

Education
4
Midamerica Nazarene University

Midamerica nazarene university (mnu) is a transformative university that nurtures christlike community, pursues academic excellence, and cultivates a passion to serve. (continued on schedule o)mnu is a comprehensive liberal arts university…

Education
5
Nebraska Wesleyan University

Nebraska wesleyan university is an academic community dedicated to intellectual and personal growth within the context of a liberal arts education and in an environment of christian concern.

Education
6
Cornell College

Cornell college offers an innovative and rigorous learning community where faculty and staff collaborate with students to develop the intellectual curiosity, creativity and moral courage necessary for a lifetime of learning and engaged…

Education
7
Council of Independent Nebraska Colleges Foundation

The council of indepependent nebraska colleges foundation exists to provide operating funds and scholarship support for students attending nebraska's independent institutions of excellence.

—
8
The Corporation of Saint Mary's College Notre Dame

The corporation of saint mary's college, notre dame (saint mary's) is a catholic, residential, women's, liberal arts college offering undergraduate degrees and co-educational graduate programs. (continued in schedule o)

Education
9
Columbia College Chicago

The organization's mission is to educate students for creative occupations in diverse fields of arts and media.

Education
10
Benedictine College

Benedictine college's mission as a catholic, benedictine, liberal arts, residential college is the education of men and women within a community of faith & scholarship.

Education
11
Coe College

Coe college is a private, four-year co-educational liberal arts college.

Education
12
Luther College

Founded by the norwegian evangelical lutheran church in 1861, luther college is a four-year, residential liberal arts institution. luther welcomes students of all backgrounds to engage in a way of learning that moves beyond immediate…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Concordia University; the most unlike its peers is Savannah College of Art and DesignInc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

19 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 19 of the 78 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
19/19
Grantees still filing
9/19
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CITY OF NEBRASKA CITY: $133,000 · OtherCITY OF NEBRASKA CITYPartners for Otoe County: $57,650 · OtherPartners for Otoe CountyAPACE: $50,000 · OtherAPACENEBRASKA CITY BASEBALL ASSOCIATION: $47,500 · OtherNEBRASKA CITY BASEBALL ASSOCIATIONMorton James Public Library: $46,952 · OtherMorton James Public LibraryNC Museum Association: $35,000 · OtherNEBRASKA CITY FIRE & RESCUE: $35,000 · OtherNebraska City Community Foundation Fund: $30,000 · OtherNEBRASKA CITY VETERANS MEMORIAL: $27,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $25,600 · Other+53 more: $275,885 · Other+53 moreNEBRASKA CITY PUBLIC SCHOOLS FOUNDATION: $91,350 · EducationNEBRASKA CI…HASTINGS COLLEGE: $6,000 · EducationHASTINGS CO…CONCORDIA UNIVERSITY: $4,000 · Education+4 more: $6,500 · Education+4 moreNEBRASKA CITY VETERANS MEMORIAL BUILDING PROJECT: $60,000 · Community ImprovementNATIONAL ARBOR DAY FOUNDATION: $40,000 · EnvironmentST MARY'S COMMUNITY HOSPITAL: $20,000 · HealthNEBRASKA CITY MUSEUM ASSOCIATION: $10,000 · Arts & CultureOMAHA CONSERVATORY OF MUSIC: $7,000 · Arts & CultureKREGEL WINDMILL FACTORY MUSEUM: $2,500 · Arts & CultureGIRL SCOUTS SPIRIT OF NEBRASKA: $10,000 · Youth DevelopmentPEOPLE UNITED FOR FAMILIES: $6,000 · Human Services
Other$763,587Education$107,850Community Improvement$60,000Environment$40,000Health$20,000Arts & Culture$19,500Youth Development$10,000Human Services$6,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetNEBRASKA CITY PUBLIC SCHOOLS FOUNDATION: $91,350 over 7y, 7.4% of budgetNEBRASKA CITY VETERANS MEMORIAL BUILDING PROJECT: $60,000 over 4y, 2.8% of budgetNATIONAL ARBOR DAY FOUNDATION: $40,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetST MARY'S COMMUNITY HOSPITAL: $20,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetST MARY'S HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $16,500 over 4y, 11% of budgetNEBRASKA CITY MUSEUM ASSOCIATION: $10,000 over 1y, 11% of budgetGIRL SCOUTS SPIRIT OF NEBRASKA: $10,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetOMAHA CONSERVATORY OF MUSIC: $7,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetHASTINGS COLLEGE: $6,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetPEOPLE UNITED FOR FAMILIES: $6,000 over 1y, 2.3% of budgetCONCORDIA UNIVERSITY: $4,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetKREGEL WINDMILL FACTORY MUSEUM: $2,500 over 1y, 1.9% of budgetSavannah College of Art and DesignInc: $2,250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetKANSAS CITY ART INSTITUTE: $2,250 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetREGENT UNIVERSITY: $2,250 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCARLETON COLLEGE: $1,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMIDLAND UNIVERSITY: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds NEBRASKA CITY PUBLIC SCHOOLS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds NEBRASKA CITY VETERANS MEMORIAL BUILDING PROJECT ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL ARBOR DAY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds ST MARY'S COMMUNITY HOSPITAL ↗
  • Who funds ST MARY'S HOSPITAL FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds NEBRASKA CITY MUSEUM ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds GIRL SCOUTS SPIRIT OF NEBRASKA ↗
  • Who funds OMAHA CONSERVATORY OF MUSIC ↗
  • Who funds HASTINGS COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds PEOPLE UNITED FOR FAMILIES ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Karl H and Wealtha H Nelson Family FoundationNE24.2× affinity9 shared granteesties to 10 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Karl H and Wealtha H Nelson Family Foundation · The Steinhart Foundation Inc · Paul John Anton & Doris Wirth Foundation Inc · Nebraska Community Foundation · Lincoln Community Foundation Inc · Folds of Honor Foundation · Tulsa Community Foundation · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Charities Aid Foundation America · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Kropp Charitable Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Kropp Charitable Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2025
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%15%30%45%60%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    8report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Kropp Charitable Foundation Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Kropp Charitable Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 78 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Kropp’s filings →

    More from the funding graph