Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

Kristi Yamaguchi Always Dream Foundation

See schedule othe organization's purpose is to engage in charitable and educational activities, including but not limited to ensuring children from low-income families have access to high-quality books in the home environment and extensive family engagement support.we believe that providing children with high-quality books will help…

$102k
Granted FY2018
5
Grants FY2018
2
States reached
$30k
Largest

Read this first · the figures below need context

100% of Kristi Yamaguchi Always Dream Foundation’s FY2024 grant dollars went to Hawaii Community Foundation, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2024 names 0 organizations directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it. Everything below is therefore FY2018, the last year Kristi Yamaguchi Always Dream Foundation named its own grantees at scale: 5 organizations, $80k. It is dated, not current.

Organizations named directly on the return

5
17
5
18
3
19
1
21
1
23
0
24

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

01What you fund
0195% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172024.

Education$115kYouth Development$24kArts & Culture$23kRecreation & Sports$20kPhilanthropy$18kPublic Safety & Disaster$10kHuman Services$7kOther$0
02FY2018 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 5 grants below total $79,700 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $101,879 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $22,179 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2018

  • Under $10k2 grants · $15k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $65k
$11,400
Median grant
2
States reached
$4.4M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
RAISING A READER$30,000
HAWAII LITERACY$23,300
BRIAN BOITANO'S YOUTH SKATE$11,400
JAPANESE CULTURAL CENTER OF HAWAII$7,500
BORP$7,500
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY17–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 100% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 7%RAISING A READER (NATIONAL): $31k → 7%BRIAN BOITANO'S YOUTH SKATE: $11k → 8%NAPA VALLEY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $10k → 9%COMMUNITY FOUNDATION SONOMA COUNTY: $10k → 9%BORP: $8k → 10%HANDSON BAY AREA: $7k → 10%HAWAII LITERACY: $23k → 9%RAISING A READER: $30k → 7%Brian Boitano's Youth Skate: $7k → 8%BAY AREA OUTREACH & RECREATION PROGRAM: $8k → 10%JAPANESE CULTURAL CENTER OF HAWAII: $10k → 9%BRIAN BOITANO'S YOUTH SKATE: $5k → 8%BORP: $5k → 10%JAPANESE CULTURAL CENTER OF HAWAII: $8k → 9%STARLIGHT PARK - CARTWRIGHT SCHOOL DISTRICT: $12k → 8%ALLENDALE ELEMENTARY: $10k → 10%HAWAII BOOK & MUSIC FESTIVAL: $5k → 9%INTERNATIONAL COMMUNITY SCHOOL: $9k → 10%HAWAII COMMUNITY FOUNDATION - MAUI STRONG FUND: $8k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

62%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$123k · 4 repeat orgs$76k to everyone else

4 repeat relationships — 4 still active in FY2018, 0 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2018 (too recent to call). Read against FY2018, the last year this funder named its own grantees directly; its giving has since run through a sponsor, which reports no donor behind each grant.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

4
1

Total granted

$123k
$5k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+30%
+84%

Still filing today

100%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 0% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $7k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’21’23
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’21’23
Arts & CultureEducationRecreation & SportsPhilanthropyOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • RA
    Raising A Reader
    2× · 2017–2018 · $61k · revenue +30%
  • BB
    Brian Boitanos Youth Skate Inc
    3× · 2017–2021 · $24k · revenue +99% · 98% of their budget
  • JC
    JAPANESE CULTURAL CENTER OF HAWAII
    2× · 2017–2018 · $18k · revenue +1%

Funded once

  • HB
    Hawaii Book and Music Festivalgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $5k · revenue +84%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Kukio Hoomana Fund

The kuki'o ho'omana fund seeks to uplift and enrich our hawai'i island community through intentional investments in curated local organizations focusing on youth empowerment, affordable housing, environmental preservation, cultural…

Philanthropy
2
Berkeley Public Library Foundation

The Berkeley Public Library Foundation (BPLF) amplifies the public investment to make a great public library extraordinary. To that end, we provide vital funds and ongoing advocacy to advance the Library's mission, vision, and strategic…

Philanthropy
3
Hawaii Public Radio

The mission of hawai'i public radio is to serve the people of hawai'i by informing with essential news, inspiring through the power of music and the arts, and connecting through conversations and convenings.

4
Reading Is Fundamental Honolulu Inc

To promote literacy through book ownership and book choice serving underserved Pre-K through 3rd grade students in Hawaii's Title I Public Schools within the City and County of Honolulu.

5
Honolulu Community Action Program Inc

Poi: providing opportunities and inspiration to enable low-income individuals or families to achieve self-reliance. hcap's mission is very deeply rooted in its responsiveness to the community and its needs. it is hcap's belief and…

6
California Humanities

California humanities was founded in 1975 with a defined mission to connect californians to ideas and one another in order to understand our shared heritage and diverse cultures, inspire civic participation, and shape our future.

Arts & Culture
7
Hawaii Island Community Development Corporation

Hawaii island community development corporation was established on july 7, 1986, to provide families with low and moderate income with adequate housing and to acquire, construct and provide housing related activities.

Housing & Shelter
8
Honolulu Festival Foundation

To promote, sponsor, maintain, develop, improve and protect the annual event known as the honolulu festival and other similar celebrations of cultural understanding, economic cooperation and racial harmony between and among the people of…

Arts & Culture
9
Hawaii Council for Humanities

To promote awareness of the humanities to the general public.

10
Ho'ola Lahui Hawaii

To improve the health and well-being of our community.

Human Services
11
Council for Native Hawaiian Advancement

The council for native hawaiian advancement (cnha) is a member-based 501(c)(3) non-profit organization with a mission to enhance the cultural, economic, political, and community development of native hawaiians.

Education
12
Hawaii Symphony Orchestra

To present the highest-quality performances of great music, bringing national and international distinction to the orchestra and its community; to delight and educate audiences of all ages and backgrounds, and enhance the cultural vitality…

Arts & Culture

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Hawaii Community Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Hawaii Book and Music Festival. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 13 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/10
Grantees still filing
6/10
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

HAWAII LITERACY INC — $23,300 · OtherHAWAII LITERACY INCBay Area Outreach and Recreation Program — $20,000 · OtherBay Area Outreach and Recreation ProgramOAKLAND UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT — $18,212 · OtherOAKLAND UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICTCARTWRIGHT SCHOOL DISTRICT — $12,308 · OtherCARTWRIGHT SCHOOL DISTRICTIndividual grant recipient — $10,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientRaising A Reader — $61,000 · EducationRaising A ReaderSONOMA COUNTY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $10,000 · PhilanthropySONOMA COUNTY COM…COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF THE NAPA VALLEY — $10,000 · PhilanthropyCOMMUNITY FOUNDAT…HAWAII COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $7,500 · PhilanthropyHAWAII COMMUNITY …HANDSON BAY AREA — $6,890 · PhilanthropyHANDSON BAY AREABrian Boitanos Youth Skate Inc — $24,000 · Recreation & SportsBrian Boitan…JAPANESE CULTURAL CENTER OF HAWAII — $17,500 · Arts & CultureJAPANESE CU…Hawaii Book and Music Festival — $5,000 · Arts & CultureHawaii Book…
Other$83,820Education$61,000Philanthropy$34,390Recreation & Sports$24,000Arts & Culture$22,500

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetRaising A Reader — $61,000 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetBrian Boitanos Youth Skate Inc — $24,000 over 3y, 98% of budgetHAWAII LITERACY INC — $23,300 over 1y, 2.9% of budgetBay Area Outreach and Recreation Program — $20,000 over 3y, 0.9% of budgetJAPANESE CULTURAL CENTER OF HAWAII — $17,500 over 2y, 1.4% of budgetSONOMA COUNTY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF THE NAPA VALLEY — $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetHAWAII COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $7,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHANDSON BAY AREA — $6,890 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

American Online Giving Foundation IncDE5.8× affinity4 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Kristi Yamaguchi Always Dream Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%6%25%56%100%your share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Kristi Yamaguchi Always Dream Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Kristi Yamaguchi Always Dream Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 13 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2018, released 2018. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2025) is on record and reports $28k of grant expense, but none of it to a named recipient. On a Form 990 that can mean grants abroad, filed by region only (Schedule F), grants under $5,000, which are not itemized, or a schedule referenced as an attachment the e-file does not carry. The figures above are therefore from FY2018, the most recent year this funder named its grantees.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph