Skip to content

· Private foundation

Krishnan-Shah Family Foundation Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$3.7M
Granted FY2024still arriving
41
Grants FY2024still arriving
8
States reached
$788k
Largest
01What it funds
0191% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Education$4.7MPhilanthropy$2.7MInternational$2.5MCommunity Improvement$1.3MArts & Culture$948kPublic Benefit$750kYouth Development$725kHealth$549kOther$0
02FY2024 · 41 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k12 grants · $39k
  • $10k–50k12 grants · $265k
  • $50k–250k13 grants · $1.3M
  • $250k+4 grants · $2.1M
$25,000
Median grant
8
States reached
$67M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
AIM (AMERICAN INDIAN FOUNDATION)$787,500
ACCION EQUITY CAMPAIGN$600,000
SILICON VALLEY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION$450,000
INDIA ENERGY AND CLIMATE CENTER$250,000
THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY$200,000
KQED$200,000
THE PROXIMITY FUND$150,000
LONDON SCHOOL OF ECONOMICS$100,000
MERIT AMERICA$100,000
DIGITAL NEST$100,000
Individual grant recipient$100,000
SFFILM$70,000
EASTSIDE COLLEGE PREPARATORY SCHOOL$50,000
FOUNDATION FOR COMMUNITY COLLEGES$50,000
CENTER ON RURAL INNOVATIONS$50,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $349k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 81% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%MAITRI: $1k → 10%THORN: $50k → 14%FOR OTHERS COLLECTIVE: $5k → 4%THORN: $50k → 14%GREY BEARS: $1k → 13%THORN: $25k → 14%MERIT AMERICA: $100k → 14%MERIT AMERICA: $50k → 14%BILL WILSON CENTER: $5k → 8%THE INNOCENCE PROJECT: $5k → 17%BILL WILSON CENTER: $5k → 8%BILL WILSON CENTER: $5k → 8%BILL WILSON CENTER: $2k → 8%BILL WILSON CENTER: $2k → 8%AVENIDAS: $10k → 8%BILL WILSON CENTER: $2k → 8%BILL WILSON CENTER: $1k → 8%BENETECH: $20k → 8%BENETECH: $10k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

VT
WA
NY
MA
OH
NJ
CA
TN
DC
HI
AL
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 27% of Krishnan-Shah Family Foundation Inc’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address.

Krishnan-Shah Family Foundation Inclessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 6.1% directed abroad (not shown)
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

66%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$7.5M · 49 repeat orgs$3.9M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +42% since the first grant, against +15% for those funded once.

49 repeat relationships: 17 still active in FY2024, 32 since wound down; 21 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

49
37

Total granted

$7.5M
$1.5M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+42%
+15%

Still filing today

59%
51%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 21% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2.4M went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesInternationalHealthArts & CultureCommunity ImprovementEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TA
    THE AMERICAN INDIA FOUNDATION
    6× · 2017–2023 · $2.4M · revenue +188%
  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BERKELEY FOUNDATION
    2× · 2023–2024 · $253k · revenue +10%
  • SH
    STANFORD HEALTH CARE
    4× · 2018–2023 · $210k · revenue +79%

Funded once

  • AO
    ACCION OPPORTUNITY FUND INC
    one grant, 2023 · $600k · revenue +6%
  • FF
    FR - FIDELITY DAF ACCOUNT - A9G-448285
    one grant, 2022 · $150k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2023 · $100k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Accion International

Our mission is to create a fair and inclusive economy where underserved people have quality financial choices and opportunities to improve their economic well-being. we find and help build innovative companies with the potential to reach…

International
2
California Forward

Ca fwd drives action to identify solutions that can be taken to scale to meet the challenges the state is facing. the organization is driven by the belief that regional solutions across the state will help ensure economic, environmental,…

Public Benefit
3
Ucsf Foundation Investment Company

The organization provides professional investment management services for endowed gifts and financial assets entrusted to the ucsf foundation.

Education
4
Upturn Inc

Upturn advances equity and justice in the design, governance, and use of technology.

—
5
Central Indiana Corporate Partnership Inc

Central indiana corporate partnership (cicp) is an alliance of indiana's business and research university leaders coming together to foster long-term prosperity for the region. cicp's mission is to transform the economy of indiana in order…

Community Improvement
6
Common Future

Common future is a network of pioneering leaders across the u.s. and canada who work deeply within their communities to create alternative approaches to business, philanthropy, and investing. we envision an economy that has transitioned…

Community Improvement
7
The Common Application Inc

The common application is a not-for-profit membership organization of over 1,100 colleges and universities across the globe committed to access, equity, and integrity in the college admission process. every year, over 1.5 million students…

Education
8
Future 500

See attached statementprimary missionfuture 500 builds trust between corporations, advocates, investors, and philanthropists to advance business as a force for good. we are experts in stakeholder engagement with over 25 years of experience…

—
9
Golden Gate University

Golden gate university prepares individuals to lead and serve by providing high quality, practice-based educational programs in law, taxation, business and related professions - as a nonprofit institution - in an innovative and challenging…

Education
10
Sankara Eye Foundation Usa

To work towards eradicating curable blindness all over india. our key program is vision 20/20 - with the goal of performing 500,000 free surgeries per year throughout india. we have been primarily partnering with sankara eye foundation in…

Health
11
Devworks International

Devworks international is dedicated to a society where all people enjoy the freedom to pursue their own sustainable development. we contribute to this by strengthening the capacity of local organizations.

Human Services
12
The Union of Concerned Scientists Inc

The union of concerned scientists puts rigorous, independent science into action, developing solutions and advocating for a healthy, safe, and just future.

International
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Center On Rural Innovation Inc; the most unlike its peers is Indians for Collective Action. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

62 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 62 of the 110 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

3
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
12
Early backer (in before they grew)
61/62
Grantees still filing
45/62
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

AIM (AMERICAN INDIAN FOUNDATION): $787,500 · OtherAIM (AMERICAN INDIAN FOUNDATION)THE OPPORTUNITY FUND: $650,000 · OtherTHE OPPORTUNITY FUNDACCION EQUITY CAMPAIGN: $600,000 · OtherACCION EQUITY CAMPAIGNFLY - FRESH LIFELINES FOR YOUTH: $375,000 · OtherFLY - FRESH LIFELINES FOR YOUTHAUDUBON SOCIETY: $350,000 · OtherAUDUBON SOCIETYINDIA ENERGY AND CLIMATE CENTER: $250,000 · OtherDIGITAL NEST INC: $300,000 · Other+75 more: $3,114,251 · Other+75 moreTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY: $3,799,995 · EducationTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE…UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BERKELEY FOUNDATION: $252,500 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BER…+5 more: $240,000 · Education+5 moreTHE AMERICAN INDIA FOUNDATION: $2,382,625 · Public Safety & DisasterTHE AMERICAN IND…Silicon Valley Community Foundation: $1,508,086 · PhilanthropySilicon Va…+2 more: $40,500 · PhilanthropyKQED INC: $459,000 · Arts & CultureASIAN ART MUSEUM FOUNDATION OF SAN FRANCISCO: $310,000 · Arts & CultureTHE 1947 PARTITION ARCHIVE: $57,500 · Arts & Culture+2 more: $42,500 · Arts & CultureACCION OPPORTUNITY FUND INC: $600,000 · Community ImprovementNarika: $140,000 · Community ImprovementCENTER ON RURAL INNOVATION INC: $50,000 · Community Improvement+2 more: $50,000 · Community ImprovementSTANFORD HEALTH CARE: $210,000 · HealthJEENA: $80,000 · HealthINDO-AMERICAN EYE CARE SOCIETY INC: $50,000 · HealthTHE ASIAN AMERICANS FOR COMMUNITY INVOLVEMENT OF SANTA CLARA COUNTY INC: $30,500 · HealthBILL HILLARY & CHELSEA CLINTON FOUNDATION: $30,000 · HealthPINK RIBBON GOOD INC: $15,000 · Health+1 more: $10,000 · Health
Other$6,426,751Education$4,292,495Public Safety & Disaster$2,382,625Philanthropy$1,548,586Arts & Culture$869,000Community Improvement$840,000Health$425,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY: $3,799,995 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetTHE AMERICAN INDIA FOUNDATION: $2,382,625 over 6y, 4.6% of budgetSilicon Valley Community Foundation: $1,508,086 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetTHE OPPORTUNITY FUND: $650,000 over 3y, 44% of budgetKQED INC: $459,000 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetASIAN ART MUSEUM FOUNDATION OF SAN FRANCISCO: $310,000 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetDIGITAL NEST INC: $300,000 over 2y, 2.3% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BERKELEY FOUNDATION: $252,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetSTANFORD HEALTH CARE: $210,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetMERIT AMERICA: $150,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetNarika: $140,000 over 6y, 4.0% of budgetEQUAL JUSTICE INITIATIVE: $125,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetTHORN: $125,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetCOMMUNITY PURE WATER FOUNDATION INC: $125,000 over 5y, 48% of budgetCAREMESSAGE: $125,000 over 2y, 1.2% of budgetJEENA: $80,000 over 6y, 21% of budgetSan Francisco Film Society: $70,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetTHE 1947 PARTITION ARCHIVE: $57,500 over 6y, 8.2% of budgetEASTSIDE COLLEGE PREPARATORY SCHOOL INC: $50,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetTURN 2 U INC dba THE LAST MILE: $50,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetCENTER ON RURAL INNOVATION INC: $50,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetINDO-AMERICAN EYE CARE SOCIETY INC: $50,000 over 1y, 9.4% of budgetFRESH LIFELINES FOR YOUTH INC: $50,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetVILLAGE ENTERPRISE FUND: $47,500 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetHINDU COMMUNITY AND CULTURAL CENTER: $45,000 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetTHE PHILANTHROPY WORKSHOP INC DBA FORWARD GLOBAL: $40,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetTHE ASIAN AMERICANS FOR COMMUNITY INVOLVEMENT OF SANTA CLARA COUNTY INC: $30,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetBENEFICENT TECHNOLOGY INC: $30,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetBILL HILLARY & CHELSEA CLINTON FOUNDATION: $30,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetGLOBAL SCHOOL LEADERS: $25,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetYEAR UP INC: $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWILDLIFE CONSERVATION NETWORK INC: $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCENTER FOR EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITIES INC: $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLA COCINA: $25,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetINKOMOKO: $25,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetSave The Bay: $25,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetEnActe Arts Inc: $22,500 over 3y, 2.0% of budget360PLUS FOUNDATION: $22,500 over 3y, 28% of budgetBILL WILSON CENTER: $22,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetFILM INDEPENDENT: $20,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetINDIA COMMUNITY CENTER INC: $20,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetPINK RIBBON GOOD INC: $15,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetSITARE FOUNDATION: $15,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetSOCIAL GOOD FUND INC: $15,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetUPWARDLY GLOBAL: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE URBAN FOREST: $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetAVENIDAS: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetLAST MILE HEALTH: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds THE AMERICAN INDIA FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Silicon Valley Community Foundation ↗
  • Who funds THE OPPORTUNITY FUND ↗
  • Who funds ACCION OPPORTUNITY FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds KQED INC ↗
  • Who funds ASIAN ART MUSEUM FOUNDATION OF SAN FRANCISCO ↗
  • Who funds DIGITAL NEST INC ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BERKELEY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds STANFORD HEALTH CARE ↗
  • Who funds MERIT AMERICA ↗
  • Who funds Narika ↗
  • Who funds EQUAL JUSTICE INITIATIVE ↗
  • Who funds THORN ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY PURE WATER FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds CAREMESSAGE ↗
  • Who funds JEENA ↗
  • Who funds San Francisco Film Society ↗
  • Who funds THE 1947 PARTITION ARCHIVE ↗
  • Who funds EASTSIDE COLLEGE PREPARATORY SCHOOL INC ↗
  • Who funds TURN 2 U INC dba THE LAST MILE ↗
  • Who funds CENTER ON RURAL INNOVATION INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Silicon Valley Community FoundationCA32.6× affinity23 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Silicon Valley Community Foundation · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · Gordon E and Betty I Moore Foundation · Bright Funds Foundation · Marin Community Foundation · Tides Foundation · Rockefeller Philanthropy Advisors Inc · Impactassetsinc · The Sobrato Family Foundation · Philanthropic Ventures Foundation · The David and Lucile Packard Foundation · The San Francisco Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Krishnan-Shah Family Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Krishnan-Shah Family Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 37%
  • Center On Rural Innovation Inc: 37% of income from government
  • Year Up Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
16report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 110 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Krishnan-Shah Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph