Skip to content
Krinsky Family Foundation Inc at a glance

· Private foundation

Krinsky Family Foundation Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$120k
Granted FY2024still arriving
37
Grants FY2024still arriving
7
States reached
$32k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
0173% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2021 to 2024.

Religion$242kEducation$77kHealth$12kInternational$12kPublic Safety & Disaster$6kHuman Services$4kRecreation & Sports$3kPublic Benefit$545Other$0
02FY2024 · 37 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k33 grants · $41k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $78k
$500
Median grant
7
States reached
$460k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CHABAD AT FLORIDA INTERNATIONAL UNIVERSITY$32,010
LANAAR ELEMENTARY SCHOOL$25,000
OD YOSEF CHAI$10,800
FRIENDSHIP CIRCLE INTERNATIONAL$10,362
MERKOS L'INYONEI CHINUCH$7,360
ROFEH CHOLIM CANCER SOCIETY$6,040
KEREN HACHOMESH$5,000
BAIS MENACHEM$4,790
CHABAD LUBAVITCH WORLD HEADQUARTERS$3,735
CHABAD OF THE FIVE TOWNS$2,288
CHABAD AT THE CIVIC CENTER$1,800
JEWISH LEARNING CENTER$1,500
TORAH ACADEMY FOR GIRLS$1,030
MACCABI USA$1,030
Individual grant recipient$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–24, $18k) land where the poverty rate runs at 20%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 99% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%DAVIS MEMORIAL FUND: $180 → 6%KEREN HACHOMESH: $5k → 20%KEREN HACHOMESH: $5k → 20%KEREN HACHOMESH: $5k → 20%KEREN HACHOMESH: $2k → 20%BIKUR CHOLIM OF MIAMI BEACH: $118 → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NH
ID
MT
NY
MA
OR
NV
PA
NJ
CT
CA
AZ
LA
GA
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

68%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$307k · 31 repeat orgs$144k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +13% since the first grant, against 0% for those funded once.

31 repeat relationships: 13 still active in FY2024, 18 since wound down; 24 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

31
41

Total granted

$307k
$85k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+13%
0%

Still filing today

23%
20%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 50% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $59k went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22’23’24
EducationReligionPhilanthropyInternationalHuman ServicesPublic Safety & DisasterOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • LE
    Lanaar Elementary School Inc
    2× · 2023–2024 · $75k · revenue +56%
  • HS
    HATZALAH SOUTH FLORIDA EMERGENCY MEDCIAL SERVICES INC
    3× · 2021–2024 · $6k · revenue +40%
  • TA
    THE ALEPH INSTITUTE INC
    2× · 2021–2022 · $1k · revenue +18%

Funded once

  • RC
    RAPHAEL CHAIM MEIR SURFSIDE
    one grant, 2023 · $18k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2021 · $14k
  • CL
    CHABAD LUBAVITCH OF NH
    one grant, 2023 · $10k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Gemilas Chesed Kramer Inc
Philanthropy
2
Zohar Hatorah Inc

Religious School

Religion
3
Chasdei Dovid Elimelech Inc
Philanthropy
4
Shaarei Halacha Inc
Philanthropy
5
The Keren Rachaim Fund
—
6
Sherit Isroel
—
7
Chabad Lametayel Inc

encourage and facilitate the observance of traditional orthodox Jewish practices around the world.

—
8
Israel Chai Foundation Inc

Provided grants to domestic and foreign organizations for purposes for furthering religious outreach and religious education.

International
9
Tal Hashamayim Foundation
Religion
10
Kollel Chazon Ish

To make grants to religious and charitable organizations

—
11
American Friends of Kulo Zakai Inc

American Friends of Kulo Zakai Inc provides support to Jewish educational institutions that further religious observance, Torah study, and education in Israel and the US, in order to strengthen the continuity of the Jewish People.

International
12
Kedem for the Kiev Jewish Community

Provide support to the Jewish people of Ukraine by providing support to Jewish institutions in Ukraine.

Religion
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Rofeh Cholim Cancer Society Inc; the most unlike its peers is Mazal Institute Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

21 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 21 of the 96 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
20/21
Grantees still filing
7/21
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Individual grant recipient: $40,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientOD YOSEF CHAI INC: $37,000 · OtherOD YOSEF CHAI INCCHABAD AT FLORIDA INTERNATIONAL UNIVERSITY: $32,010 · OtherCHABAD AT FLORIDA INTERNATIONAL UNIVERSITYBAIS MENACHEM: $24,790 · OtherBAIS MENACHEMIndividual grant recipient: $20,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientRAPHAEL CHAIM MEIR SURFSIDE: $18,000 · OtherRAPHAEL CHAIM MEIR SURFSIDECHABAD LUBAVITCH WORLD HEADQUARTERS: $17,883 · OtherCHABAD LUBAVITCH WORLD HEADQUARTERSIndividual grant recipient: $13,824 · OtherCHABAD LUBAVITCH: $13,720 · OtherRCCS: $12,440 · Other+70 more: $93,988 · Other+70 moreLanaar Elementary School Inc: $75,000 · EducationLanaar Elementary S…+3 more: $860 · EducationKEREN HACHOMESH INC: $17,375 · Human Services+2 more: $298 · Human ServicesFRIENDSHIP CIRCLE INTERNATIONAL INC: $10,362 · ReligionMAZAL INSTITUTE INC: $2,374 · ReligionKOLEL TORAH INC: $1,500 · Religion+1 more: $360 · ReligionROFEH CHOLIM CANCER SOCIETY INC: $11,400 · PhilanthropyYaldei Shluchei Harebbe Special Needs Organization: $740 · Philanthropy+1 more: $183 · PhilanthropyHATZALAH SOUTH FLORIDA EMERGENCY MEDCIAL SERVICES INC: $5,865 · Public Safety & DisasterTHE ALEPH INSTITUTE INC: $1,442 · Crime & Legal
Other$323,655Education$75,860Human Services$17,673Religion$14,596Philanthropy$12,323Public Safety & Disaster$5,865Crime & Legal$1,442

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetLanaar Elementary School Inc: $75,000 over 2y, 1.2% of budgetKEREN HACHOMESH INC: $17,375 over 4y, 0.9% of budgetROFEH CHOLIM CANCER SOCIETY INC: $11,400 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHATZALAH SOUTH FLORIDA EMERGENCY MEDCIAL SERVICES INC: $5,865 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetMAZAL INSTITUTE INC: $2,374 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetKOLEL TORAH INC: $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE ALEPH INSTITUTE INC: $1,442 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMACCABI USA INC: $1,030 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetYaldei Shluchei Harebbe Special Needs Organization: $740 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHAI LIFELINE INC: $725 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetGan Academy: $430 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetGush Etzion Foundation % Juliette Landesman: $360 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetESHEL: $360 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetHOFFMAN INSTITUTE FOUNDATION: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM: $230 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetKupa Shel Tzedakah Inc: $183 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHEDER CHABAD OF MONSEY: $180 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDAVIS MEMORIAL FUND INC: $180 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBIKUR CHOLIM OF MIAMI BEACH INC: $118 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Lanaar Elementary School Inc ↗
  • Who funds KEREN HACHOMESH INC ↗
  • Who funds ROFEH CHOLIM CANCER SOCIETY INC ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDSHIP CIRCLE INTERNATIONAL INC ↗
  • Who funds HATZALAH SOUTH FLORIDA EMERGENCY MEDCIAL SERVICES INC ↗
  • Who funds MAZAL INSTITUTE INC ↗
  • Who funds KOLEL TORAH INC ↗
  • Who funds THE ALEPH INSTITUTE INC ↗
  • Who funds MACCABI USA INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Jewish Communal FundKrinsky Foundation IncGs Donor Advised Phil…The Ojc FundGoodness & Kindness F…Jla Charitable Founda…Saul Schottenstein Fo…Murray & Sydell Rosen…Jewish Federation of …Mzl 40 FoundationAlice G Hanson Family…The Falic Family Priv…
Jewish Communal FundNY26.9× affinity17 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Jewish Communal Fund · Krinsky Foundation Inc · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · The Ojc Fund · Goodness & Kindness Foundation · Jla Charitable Foundation · Saul Schottenstein Foundation C · Murray & Sydell Rosenberg Foundationinc · Jewish Federation of Greater Atlanta Inc · Mzl 40 Foundation · Alice G Hanson Family Foundation · The Falic Family Private Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Krinsky Family Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Krinsky Family Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 50%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • The Aleph Institute Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
5get no government money at all
5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Krinsky Family Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to Krinsky Family Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 96 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Krinsky Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home