Skip to content

· Private foundation

Kol Sason Foundation Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$75k
Granted FY2024still arriving
17
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$20k
Largest
01What it funds
0179% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Religion$294kEducation$204kPhilanthropy$22kRecreation & Sports$16kHuman Services$15kCivil Rights$10kHealth$1kInternational$150Other$0
02FY2024 · 17 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k13 grants · $18k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $56k
$1,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$69k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CONGREGATION AHAVAS CHESED$20,000
CONGREGATION ZICHRON MOSHE$14,518
Individual grant recipient$11,700
CHEVRA SHAS$10,000
LAKEWOOD CHEDER SCHOOL$5,000
BAIS KAILA$5,000
YESHIVA TORAS ZEV$4,925
CHEMDAS BAIS YAAKOV$1,450
Y&R RELIGIOUS ARTICLES$1,000
CHAI LIFELINE$200
YESHIVA TIFERES BARUCH$200
HATZOLAH$200
Individual grant recipient$100
SOUTH BEND HEBREW DAY SCHOOL$100
Individual grant recipient$100
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–20, $134) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 40% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 11%MISASKIM: $36 → 20%MISASKIM: $18 → 20%AHAVAS TZEDAKAH: $80 → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

72%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$477k · 26 repeat orgs$185k to everyone else

26 repeat relationships: 9 still active in FY2024, 17 since wound down; 8 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

26
50

Total granted

$477k
$168k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+48%
+126%

Still filing today

31%
14%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 76% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $18k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationReligionHuman ServicesHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • LC
    LAKEWOOD CHEDER SCHOOL INC
    6× · 2017–2024 · $142k · revenue +48%
  • TB
    TIFERES BAIS YAAKOV INC
    5× · 2018–2022 · $36k · revenue +31%
  • BK
    BAIS KAILA TORAH PREPARATORY HS
    6× · 2018–2024 · $36k · revenue +71%

Funded once

  • TO
    TASHBAR OF LAKEWOOD INC
    one grant, 2017 · $23k · revenue +13%
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2019 · $22k
  • CF
    CONGREGATION FOREST PARK
    one grant, 2019 · $16k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Yeshiva Toras Chaim of Greater Miami Inc

To operate a religious school for high school and post high school students.

Education
2
Yeshiva Toras Chaim Inc

The organization operates a religious/parochial high school and college in lakewood, nj.

Unclassified
3
Yeshivat Or Hachaim of Lakewood Inc

Parochial elementary school with a focus on sephardic tradition.

Education
4
Yeshivat Yagdil Torah Inc

Providing jewish and secular education for elementary school aged children.

Education
5
Yeshiva Toras Aron Inc

Yeshiva toras aron is a religious elementary school providing quality education for grades k-8 for the children of lakewood nj.

Education
6
Cheder Shiras Hatorah Inc

Providing jewish and secular education for elementary school aged children.

Education
7
Toras Chaim Development Company Inc

Provide a building for a religious school.

Education
8
Yeshiva Keter Torah Inc

Providing secular and religious education for elementary and high school aged students

Education
9
Toras Imecha Inc

Providing jewish and secular education for elementary and high school aged children.

Education
10
Yeshiva Nesivos Hatorah Inc

Providing jewish and secular education for elementary school aged children.

Education
11
Yeshivas Ohr Hatorah Inc

Operation of a parochial elementary school, providing education services to students

Education
12
Yeshiva Shaar Hatalmud

Providing jewish education to high school age students.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Yeshivas Toras Zev Inc; the most unlike its peers is Misaskim Corp. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

17 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 17 of the 85 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
17/17
Grantees still filing
15/17
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CONGREGATION AHAVAS CHESED: $93,000 · OtherCONGREGATION AHAVAS CHESEDIndividual grant recipient: $75,800 · OtherIndividual grant recipientCONGREGATION ZICHRON MOSHE INC: $48,681 · OtherCONGREGATION ZICHRON MOSHE INCBAIS KAILA TORAH PREPARATORY HS: $35,600 · OtherBAIS KAILA TORAH PREPARATORY HSTASHBAR OF LAKEWOOD INC: $22,500 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $22,000 · OtherCONGREGATION FOREST PARK: $16,000 · Other+64 more: $140,404 · Other+64 moreLAKEWOOD CHEDER SCHOOL INC: $141,500 · EducationLAKEWOOD CHEDER SCHOOL INCTIFERES BAIS YAAKOV INC: $35,750 · EducationTIFERES BAIS YAAKOV INCBNOS BAIS YAAKOV OF FAR ROCKAWAY: $8,000 · EducationYESHIVA KOL TORAH INC: $7,500 · Education+2 more: $4,474 · EducationDONORS FUND INC: $22,000 · PhilanthropyTZUR FOUNDATION INC: $5,000 · ReligionYESHIVAS TORAS ZEV INC: $4,925 · ReligionHERITAGE FOR THE BLIND INC: $400 · ReligionTORAS CHESED INC: $400 · ReligionCHAI LIFELINE INC: $400 · HealthAHAVAS TZEDAKA INC: $80 · Human ServicesMISASKIM CORP: $54 · Human Services
Other$453,985Education$197,224Philanthropy$22,000Religion$10,725Health$400Human Services$134

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetLAKEWOOD CHEDER SCHOOL INC: $141,500 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetTIFERES BAIS YAAKOV INC: $35,750 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetBAIS KAILA TORAH PREPARATORY HS: $35,600 over 6y, 0.4% of budgetTASHBAR OF LAKEWOOD INC: $22,500 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetDONORS FUND INC: $22,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBNOS BAIS YAAKOV OF FAR ROCKAWAY: $8,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetYESHIVA KOL TORAH INC: $7,500 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetYESHIVAS TORAS ZEV INC: $4,925 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetCHEDER TORAS ZEV: $4,300 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHERITAGE FOR THE BLIND INC: $400 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTORAS CHESED INC: $400 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCHAI LIFELINE INC: $400 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetYESHIVA TIFERES BORUCH: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAHAVAS TZEDAKA INC: $80 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMISASKIM CORP: $54 over 2y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds LAKEWOOD CHEDER SCHOOL INC ↗
  • Who funds TIFERES BAIS YAAKOV INC ↗
  • Who funds BAIS KAILA TORAH PREPARATORY HS ↗
  • Who funds TASHBAR OF LAKEWOOD INC ↗
  • Who funds DONORS FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds BNOS BAIS YAAKOV OF FAR ROCKAWAY ↗
  • Who funds YESHIVA KOL TORAH INC ↗
  • Who funds TZUR FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds YESHIVAS TORAS ZEV INC ↗
  • Who funds CHEDER TORAS ZEV ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Ojc FundNY30.1× affinity16 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Ojc Fund · Donors Fund Inc · The Sorala Foundation · Jack Adjmi Family Foundation Inc · Jewish Communal Fund · Jsp Family Foundation · National Society for Hebrew Day Schools · David Rosenbaum Family Foundation · Yes Ben Dovid Foundation Inc · Zichron Btz Tzedakah Foundation · The Jmg Foundation · Jewish Community Foundation of Los Angeles

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Kol Sason Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Kol Sason Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 60%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →median 4%
  • Cheder Toras Zev: 22% of income from government
  • Tiferes Bais Yaakov Inc: 16% of income from government
  • Tashbar of Lakewood Inc: 4% of income from government
  • Yeshiva Kol Torah Inc: 3% of income from government
  • Yeshiva Tiferes Boruch: 2% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
6get no government money at all
3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Kol Sason Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to Kol Sason Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 85 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Kol Sason’s filings →

More from the funding graph