Skip to content

· Private foundation

Kohl Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$75k
Granted FY2025still arriving
15
Grants FY2025still arriving
5
States reached
$15k
Largest
01What it funds
0198% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$259kReligion$128kAnimals$66kArts & Culture$57kPublic Safety & Disaster$53kHuman Services$29kHealth$29kRecreation & Sports$28kOther$0
02FY2025 · 15 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k12 grants · $35k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $40k
$3,800
Median grant
5
States reached
$1.3M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ST JAMES LUTHERAN SCHOOL$15,000
BEACON OF HOPE$15,000
COLLECTIVUS CHURCHPRAY LOVE UNITE$10,000
FOX TUSCON THEATRE FOUNDATION$8,000
ELKHART LAKE SCHOOL DISTRICT$5,000
ELKHART LAKE FIRST RESPONDERS$5,000
LOCAL CHURCH FORSYTH$5,000
TUCSON COLD WET NOSES$3,800
ARIZONA ARTS LIVE$3,000
ELKHART LAKE BOY SCOUTS$2,000
CASA MARIA$800
CHILDRENS MUSEUM$600
SALVATION ARMY$600
SHRINERS HOSPITAL FOR CHILDREN$600
FRIENDS OF ELKHART LAKE LIBRARY$600
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 61% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONAUA PRESENTS: $7k → 15%TWO BY TWO RESCUE: $20k → 7%AUBURN WESLEY FOUNDATION: $15k → 15%COLLECTIVUS CHURCHPRAY LOVE UNITE: $15k → 16%RED RIVER UNITED METHODIST CHURCH: $5k → 18%CAMP SUMARANGA: $10k → 18%ST JAMES LUTHERAN SCHOOL: $24k → 11%LOCAL CHURCH FORSYTH: $10k → 4%UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONAUA PRESENTS: $6k → 15%HELENA UNITED METHODIST CHURCH: $15k → 7%COLLECTIVUS CHURCHPRAY LOVE UNITE: $15k → 16%CAMP SUMATANGA: $10k → 18%ST JAMES LUTHERAN SCHOOL: $24k → 11%LOCAL CHURCH FORSYTH: $10k → 4%UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONAUA PRESENTS: $6k → 15%HELENA UNITED METHODIST CHURCH: $7k → 7%COLLECTIVUS CHURCHPRAY LOVE UNITE: $10k → 16%CAMP SUMATANGA: $7k → 18%ST JAMES LUTHERAN SCHOOL: $20k → 11%LOCAL CHURCH FORSYTH: $5k → 4%ARIZONA HUMANE SOCIETY: $5k → 11%UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONAUA PRESENTS: $6k → 15%TWO BY TWO RESCUE: $7k → 7%COLLECTIVUS CHURCHPRAY LOVE UNITE: $10k → 16%ST JAMES LUHERAN SCHOOL: $20k → 11%TWO BY TWO RESCUE: $5k → 7%COLLECTIVUS CHURCHPRAY LOVE UNITE: $7k → 16%ST JAMES LUTHERAN SCHOOL: $20k → 11%PRAY LOVE UNITE MINISTRIES: $10k → 16%ST JAMES LUTHERAN SCHOOL: $15k → 11%PRAY LOVE UNITE MINISTRIES: $8k → 16%ST JAMES LUTHERAN SCHOOL: $15k → 11%ST JAMES LUTHERAN SCHOOL: $15k → 11%ST JAMES LUTHERAN SCHOOL: $12k → 11%ELKHART LAKE SCHOOL DISTRICT: $13k → 9%ELKHART LAKE SCHOOL DISTRICT: $13k → 9%ELKAHART LAKE SCHOOL DISTRICT: $12k → 9%ELKHART LAKE SCHOOL DISTRICT: $10k → 9%ELKHART LAKE SCHOOL DISTRICT: $10k → 9%ELKHART LAKE SCHOOL DISTRICT: $10k → 9%ELKHART LAKE SCHOOL DISTRICT: $7k → 9%ELKHART LAKE FIRST RESPONDERS: $7k → 9%ELKHART LAKE FIRST RESPONDERS: $7k → 9%ELKHART LAKE FIRST RESPONDERS: $6k → 9%ELKHART LAKE FIRST RESPONDERS: $6k → 9%ELKHART LAKE FIRST RESPONDERS: $6k → 9%ELKHART LAKE FIRST RESPONDERS: $6k → 9%ELKHART LAKE FIRST RESPONDERS: $6k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
WI
OR
CA
UT
CO
MD
AZ
AL
GA
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

90%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$642k · 35 repeat orgs$75k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +103% since the first grant, against -1% for those funded once.

35 repeat relationships: 15 still active in FY2025, 20 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

35
16

Total granted

$642k
$75k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+103%
-1%

Still filing today

31%
19%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
AnimalsArts & CultureEducationHealthReligionCommunity ImprovementOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TB
    TWO BY TWO RESCUE LEAGUE
    4× · 2017–2021 · $37k · revenue +70%
  • FT
    FOX TUCSON THEATRE FOUNDATION
    3× · 2021–2023 · $19k · revenue +81%
  • PL
    PRAY LOVE UNITE MINISTRIES INC
    2× · 2019–2020 · $18k · revenue +106%

Funded once

  • SJ
    ST JAMES LUHERAN SCHOOL
    one grant, 2024 · $20k
  • AW
    AUBURN WESLEY FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2018 · $15k
  • EL
    ELKAHART LAKE SCHOOL DISTRICT
    one grant, 2017 · $12k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Humane Society of Southern Arizona

To compassionately serve pets and the people who love them.

Animals
2
Friends of the Palm SpringsAnimal Shelter

We are dedicated to building a community responsible for pet stewardship and humane treatment of animals.

Animals
3
One Love Arizona Rescue Advocacy & Sterilization

One love arizona's mission is to spark brighter futures for people and pets through life-saving programs.

Animals
4
Phx Cat Cafe

On average, we find homes for over 100 cats each year through our adoption program. In 2024 we fixed 125 cats with our TNR efforts and were able to provide a dozen microchips to owned pets in the community

Animals
5
Valley Humane SocietyInc

Valley Humane Society (VHS) creates a brighter future for cats and dogs by encouraging and strengthening the bond between people and pets. VHS rescues and rehabilitates companion animals, champions responsible caretaking, shares pets'…

Animals
6
Humane Society of Taos Inc dba Stray Hearts Animal Shelter

Stray Hearts is a socially conscious shelter and adoption facility reuniting lost pets with their families and providing humane care and shelter for surrendered, lost, and homeless companion animals in Taos County, New Mexico.Our pledge:…

Animals
7
Arizona Small Dog Rescue

To rescue and save homeless, unwanted, abandoned, neglected, and abused dogs

Animals
8
Lost Our Home Pet Foundation

Our mission is to provide compassionate services to pets and people in crisis.

Animals
9
Phoenix Animal Care Coalition PACC911

PACC911 (Phoenix Animal Care Coalition) unites and supports pet rescue organizations throughout Arizona by fostering collaboration and providing critical resources that strengthen lifesaving efforts. Through large well promoted adoption…

Animals
10
Phoenix Animal Rescue

Rescue, rehabilitation and "re-homing" of unwanted and abandoned dogs.

Animals
11
Fearless Kitty Rescue

As a no-kill cat rescue, serving our community of Fountain Hills, AZ and surrounding areas, we are dedicated to rescuing cats and kittens left homeless for whatever reason and placing them in a loving, responsible, permanent home.

Animals
12
Progressive Animal Welfare Society aka Paws

A champion for animals since 1967, PAWS is a nationally recognized leader - rehabilitating injured and orphaned wildlife, sheltering and adopting homeless cats and dogs, and educating people to make a better world for animals and people.

Animals
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Arizona Humane Society; the most unlike its peers is Music Is Instrumental. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

15 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 15 of the 51 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
10
Early backer (in before they grew)
14/15
Grantees still filing
12/15
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ST JAMES LUTHERAN SCHOOL: $144,500 · OtherST JAMES LUTHERAN SCHOOLELKHART LAKE SCHOOL DISTRICT: $73,000 · OtherELKHART LAKE SCHOOL DISTRICTCOLLECTIVUS CHURCHPRAY LOVE UNITE: $57,000 · OtherCOLLECTIVUS CHURCHPRAY LOVE UNITEELKHART LAKE FIRST RESPONDERS: $53,000 · OtherELKHART LAKE FIRST RESPONDERSLOCAL CHURCH FORSYTH: $25,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF ARIZONAUA PRESENTS: $24,500 · OtherHELENA UNITED METHODIST CHURCH: $22,000 · OtherTUCSON COLD WET NOSES: $20,700 · Other+29 more: $185,700 · Other+29 moreTWO BY TWO RESCUE LEAGUE: $37,000 · AnimalsTWO BY TW…Friends of Pima Animal Care Center: $12,500 · AnimalsFriends o…Arizona Humane Society: $9,700 · AnimalsArizona H…+4 more: $1,700 · AnimalsFOX TUCSON THEATRE FOUNDATION: $18,500 · Arts & CultureCHILDREN'S MUSEUM OF PHOENIX: $2,500 · Arts & CulturePRAY LOVE UNITE MINISTRIES INC: $17,500 · ReligionSister Jose Women's Center: $5,100 · Housing & ShelterMUSIC IS INSTRUMENTAL: $3,200 · EducationIntegrative Touch: $2,500 · HealthThe Womens Foundation for the State of Arizona: $1,050 · Community Improvement
Other$605,400Animals$60,900Arts & Culture$21,000Religion$17,500Housing & Shelter$5,100Education$3,200Health$2,500Community Improvement$1,050

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTWO BY TWO RESCUE LEAGUE: $37,000 over 4y, 1.7% of budgetFOX TUCSON THEATRE FOUNDATION: $18,500 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetPRAY LOVE UNITE MINISTRIES INC: $17,500 over 2y, 6.4% of budgetFriends of Pima Animal Care Center: $12,500 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetArizona Humane Society: $9,700 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSister Jose Women's Center: $5,100 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetCHILDREN'S MUSEUM OF PHOENIX: $2,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetIntegrative Touch: $2,500 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetThe Womens Foundation for the State of Arizona: $1,050 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetBEST FRIENDS ANIMAL SOCIETY: $600 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetHOPE ANIMAL SHELTER: $300 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMORRIS ANIMAL FOUNDATION: $300 over 3y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds TWO BY TWO RESCUE LEAGUE ↗
  • Who funds BEACON OF HOPE INC ↗
  • Who funds FOX TUCSON THEATRE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds PRAY LOVE UNITE MINISTRIES INC ↗
  • Who funds Friends of Pima Animal Care Center ↗
  • Who funds Arizona Humane Society ↗
  • Who funds Sister Jose Women's Center ↗
  • Who funds MUSIC IS INSTRUMENTAL ↗
  • Who funds CHILDREN'S MUSEUM OF PHOENIX ↗
  • Who funds Integrative Touch ↗
  • Who funds The Womens Foundation for the State of Arizona ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Community Foundation for Southern ArizonaAZ19.6× affinity7 shared granteesties to 10 of 10Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Community Foundation for Southern Arizona · Arizona Community Foundation · Jewish Community Foundation of Southern Arizona · United Way of Tucson and Southern Arizona Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Kohl Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Kohl Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Kohl Family Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Kohl Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 51 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Kohl Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph