Skip to content
Kodali Family Private Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

Kodali Family Private Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$7k
Granted FY2024still arriving
6
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$3k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Religion$311kArts & Culture$13kHealth$9kRecreation & Sports$5kPhilanthropy$5kInternational$1kHuman Services$1kEducation$500Other$0
02FY2024 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$1,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$201k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
TRIANGLE AREA TELUGU ASSOCIATION$2,500
TRIANGLE TELAGANA ASSOCIATION$2,000
SRI VENKATESWARA TEMPLE OF NORTH CAROLINA$1,000
NC KAMMA SANGAM$500
SAMARITAN'S PURSE$500
TRIANGLE AREA HINDU TEMPLES$250
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–19, $2k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 33% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%AIM FOR SEVA: $500 → 12%BRESH FOUNDATION: $1k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$336k · 5 repeat orgs$9k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +164% since the first grant, against +32% for those funded once.

5 repeat relationships: 3 still active in FY2024, 2 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

5
7

Total granted

$336k
$7k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+164%
+32%

Still filing today

20%
43%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 81% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’24
Human ServicesReligionInternationalPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SV
    SRI VENKATESWARA TEMPLE OF NORTH CAROLINA
    7× · 2017–2024 · $310k
  • TA
    TRIANGLE AREA TELUGU ASSOCIATION
    6× · 2017–2024 · $13k
  • TF
    TANA FOUNDATION
    2× · 2019–2021 · $6k

Funded once

  • TT
    TRINIDAD & TOBAGO GOLF ASSOCIATION
    one grant, 2019 · $5k
  • BF
    Bresh Foundation
    one grant, 2018 · $1k
  • CM
    CHINMAYA MISSION
    one grant, 2019 · $500
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Brahm Foundation

Religious worship daily poojas and festi

Education
2
Telugu Association of St Louis

Provide events celebrating teluga tradit

—
3
Manav Seva Mandir

The manav seva mandir is a hindu religious institution in the greater chicagoland area. not only is it an excellent place of worship, but it also renders a social atmosphere and a cultural center that preserves and promotes our hindu…

Religion
4
Sri Veda Vidya Peetham

Hindu temple

Religion
5
Hindu Center of Atlanta Inc

To serve atlanta area hindu community to celebrate hindu culture

Religion
6
Seva Charities
Housing & Shelter
7
Oceans of Mercy

Missionary work in the nation of India

Religion
8
Sindhi Association of North America
—
9
Vattikuti India Relief Foundation
Philanthropy
10
Parvati Parameswara Temple Inc

Relegious and spiritual worship.

Religion
11
Telangana Peoples Association of Dallas

The nbsp;purpose nbsp;of nbsp;telangana nbsp;peoples nbsp;associatiom nbsp;of nbsp;dallas nbsp;(tpad) nbsp;is nbsp;to nbsp;conduct nbsp;telengana nbsp;( nbsp;a nbsp;region nbsp;in nbsp;india) nbsp;festivals nbsp;and nbsp;events nbsp;like…

Arts & Culture
12
Nirdosh Seva Foundation
Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Triangle Telangana Association; the most unlike its peers is Samaritan's Purse. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 15 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
6/8
Grantees still filing
4/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

SRI VENKATESWARA TEMPLE OF NORTH CAROLINA: $310,243 · OtherSRI VENKATESWARA TEMPLE OF NORTH CAROLINATRIANGLE AREA TELUGU ASSOCIATION: $13,250 · Other+7 more: $14,600 · OtherTRIANGLE TELANGANA ASSOCIATION: $4,500 · PhilanthropyBresh Foundation: $1,000 · Human ServicesALL INDIA MOVEMENT FOR SEVA INC: $500 · Human ServicesSAMARITAN'S PURSE: $500 · ReligionTRIANGLE AREA HINDU TEMPLES ASSOCIATION: $250 · ReligionMUNI SEVA CHARITABLE FOUNDATION USA INC: $250 · International
Other$338,093Philanthropy$4,500Human Services$1,500Religion$750International$250

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTRIANGLE AREA TELUGU ASSOCIATION: $13,250 over 6y, 13% of budgetTRIANGLE TELANGANA ASSOCIATION: $4,500 over 2y, 2.9% of budgetSAMARITAN'S PURSE: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetALL INDIA MOVEMENT FOR SEVA INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMUNI SEVA CHARITABLE FOUNDATION USA INC: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTRIANGLE AREA HINDU TEMPLES ASSOCIATION: $250 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetNATIONAL LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICERS MEMORIAL FUND INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Kodali Family Private Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Kodali Family Private Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–24
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 15 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Kodali Family Private’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home