Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Kodali Family Private Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$7k
Granted FY2024still arriving
6
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$3k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172024.

Religion$311kArts & Culture$13kHealth$9kRecreation & Sports$5kPhilanthropy$5kInternational$1kHuman Services$1kEducation$500Other$0
02FY2024 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$1,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$201k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
TRIANGLE AREA TELUGU ASSOCIATION$2,500
TRIANGLE TELAGANA ASSOCIATION$2,000
SRI VENKATESWARA TEMPLE OF NORTH CAROLINA$1,000
NC KAMMA SANGAM$500
SAMARITAN'S PURSE$500
TRIANGLE AREA HINDU TEMPLES$250
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY18–19, $2k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 33% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%AIM FOR SEVA: $500 → 12%BRESH FOUNDATION: $1k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$336k · 5 repeat orgs$9k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +164% since the first grant, against +32% for the ones you funded once.

5 repeat relationships — 3 still active in FY2024, 2 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

5
7

Total granted

$336k
$7k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+164%
+32%

Still filing today

20%
43%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 81% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’24
Human ServicesReligionInternationalPhilanthropyOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SV
    SRI VENKATESWARA TEMPLE OF NORTH CAROLINA
    7× · 2017–2024 · $310k
  • TA
    TRIANGLE AREA TELUGU ASSOCIATION
    6× · 2017–2024 · $13k
  • TF
    TANA FOUNDATION
    2× · 2019–2021 · $6k

Funded once

  • TT
    TRINIDAD & TOBAGO GOLF ASSOCIATION
    one grant, 2019 · $5k
  • BF
    Bresh Foundation
    one grant, 2018 · $1k
  • CM
    CHINMAYA MISSION
    one grant, 2019 · $500

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Brahm Foundation

Religious worship daily poojas and festi

Education
2
Telugu Association of St Louis

Provide events celebrating teluga tradit

3
Manav Seva Mandir

The manav seva mandir is a hindu religious institution in the greater chicagoland area. not only is it an excellent place of worship, but it also renders a social atmosphere and a cultural center that preserves and promotes our hindu…

Religion
4
Sri Veda Vidya Peetham

Hindu temple

Religion
5
Hindu Center of Atlanta Inc

To serve atlanta area hindu community to celebrate hindu culture

Religion
6
Seva Charities
Housing & Shelter
7
Oceans of Mercy

Missionary work in the nation of India

Religion
8
Sindhi Association of North America
9
Vattikuti India Relief Foundation
Philanthropy
10
Parvati Parameswara Temple Inc

Relegious and spiritual worship.

Religion
11
Telangana Peoples Association of Dallas

The nbsp;purpose nbsp;of nbsp;telangana nbsp;peoples nbsp;associatiom nbsp;of nbsp;dallas nbsp;(tpad) nbsp;is nbsp;to nbsp;conduct nbsp;telengana nbsp;( nbsp;a nbsp;region nbsp;in nbsp;india) nbsp;festivals nbsp;and nbsp;events nbsp;like…

Arts & Culture
12
Nirdosh Seva Foundation
Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Triangle Telangana Association and the most unlike its peers is Samaritan's Purse. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 15 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
6/8
Grantees still filing
4/8
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

SRI VENKATESWARA TEMPLE OF NORTH CAROLINA — $310,243 · OtherSRI VENKATESWARA TEMPLE OF NORTH CAROLINATRIANGLE AREA TELUGU ASSOCIATION — $13,250 · Other+7 more — $14,600 · OtherTRIANGLE TELANGANA ASSOCIATION — $4,500 · PhilanthropyBresh Foundation — $1,000 · Human ServicesALL INDIA MOVEMENT FOR SEVA INC — $500 · Human ServicesSAMARITAN'S PURSE — $500 · ReligionTRIANGLE AREA HINDU TEMPLES ASSOCIATION — $250 · ReligionMUNI SEVA CHARITABLE FOUNDATION USA INC — $250 · International
Other$338,093Philanthropy$4,500Human Services$1,500Religion$750International$250

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetTRIANGLE AREA TELUGU ASSOCIATION — $13,250 over 6y, 13% of budgetTRIANGLE TELANGANA ASSOCIATION — $4,500 over 2y, 2.9% of budgetSAMARITAN'S PURSE — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetALL INDIA MOVEMENT FOR SEVA INC — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMUNI SEVA CHARITABLE FOUNDATION USA INC — $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTRIANGLE AREA HINDU TEMPLES ASSOCIATION — $250 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetNATIONAL LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICERS MEMORIAL FUND INC — $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Kodali Family Private Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
2021222324
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY2024

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 15 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph