Skip to content

· Public charity

Knights of Columbus Massachusetts State Council Charity Fund

Charity fund

$156k
Granted FY2025still arriving
2
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$50k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Health$283kHuman Services$253kArts & Culture$45kRecreation & Sports$31kPublic Benefit$20kEducation$16kMembership Benefit$8kEnvironment$6k
02FY2025 · 2 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 2 grants below total $67,000, the rows itemized in this filing. The $156,290 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $89,290 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k1 grant · $17k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $50k
$50,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$4.3M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
NORTHEAST ARC$50,000
SPECIAL OLYMPICS$17,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–24, $182k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 35% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%FRIENDSHIP HOME INC: $54k → 8%HOUSE OF POSSIBILITIES: $64k → 11%THE ARC OF THE SOUTH SHORE: $64k → 7%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

35%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$230k · 4 repeat orgs$432k to everyone else

4 repeat relationships: 1 still active in FY2025, 3 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

4
22

Total granted

$230k
$382k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+40%
+43%

Still filing today

50%
27%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 25% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $50k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’24’25
Human ServicesArts & CultureRecreation & SportsEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CARDINAL CUSHING CENTERS INC
    3× · 2017–2024 · $154k · revenue +40%
  • KO
    KNIGHTS OF COLUMBUS
    2× · 2017–2018 · $35k
  • SO
    SPECIAL OLYMPICS INC
    2× · 2024–2025 · $31k · revenue 0%

Funded once

  • HO
    HOUSE OF POSSIBILITIES INCgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $64k · revenue +482%
  • TA
    THE ARC OF THE SOUTH SHORE INCgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $64k · revenue +39%
  • FH
    FRIENDSHIP HOME INC
    one grant, 2024 · $54k · revenue +8%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Viability Inc

Viability's mission is to build a world in which individuals with disabilities and other disadvantages realize acceptance, inclusion, and access.

Employment
2
Nysarc Inc New York City Chapter

We are committed to helping people with intellectual (cont. on schedule o) and developmental disabilities to live full lives.

Human Services
3
Center for Developmental Disabilities

The center's mission is to help children and adults with differing abilities achieve their dreams by overcoming barriers to living, working, learning & enjoying recreational opportunities in the community of their choice.

Human Services
4
The Arc of Essex County Inc

The arc of essex county provides advocacy and services empowering individuals with intellectual and developmental disabilities and their families to realize a lifetime of personal achievement and full partnership in the community.

Human Services
5
Progress Unlimited Inc

To empower individuals to lead fulfilling and productive lives at home and in the community.

Human Services
6
Brockton Area Arc Inc

Brockton area arc inc will work in partnership with and for the community to provide advocacy, information and direct services that offer new opportunities and choice for individuals with intellectual and developmental disabilities and…

Human Services
7
Lifestream Inc

Lifestream, inc. (the organization") provides community-based services that support individuals in attaining greater independence, promising opportunities, and lives that are meaningful and fulfilling on their own terms.

Health
8
Barc Developmental Services Inc

To serve and advocate for people with intellectual disabilities and autism.

—
9
Spectrum Support Inc

To form relationships which support people to achieve their life goals in the areas of residential, employment, meaningful community engagement and personal services.

Employment
10
Westchester School for Special Children

To provide services to children and adolescents with developmental disabilities. the school runs preschool and school age programs.

—
11
The Arc of Union County Inc

To empower and support people with intellectual and developmental disabilities and their families. this organization will utilize all its resources to ensure that our individuals served, their families and all people with intellectual and…

—
12
Lifeworks Incorporated

Lifeworks provides education, jobs and homes for persons with developmental disabilities empowering them to lead meaningful lives within the community. our guiding principles ensure that lifeworks staff and volunteers strive to create and…

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Arc of the South Shore Inc; the most unlike its peers is Face (Foundation for Advancement of Christian Education. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 27 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/10
Grantees still filing
8/10
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CARDINAL CUSHING CENTERS INC: $154,474 · OtherCARDINAL CUSHING CENTERS INCNORTHEAST ARC INC: $50,000 · OtherNORTHEAST ARC INCKNIGHTS OF COLUMBUS: $35,000 · OtherKNIGHTS OF COLUMBUSIndividual grant recipient: $30,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient+17 more: $129,474 · Other+17 moreHOUSE OF POSSIBILITIES INC: $64,000 · Human ServicesHOUSE OF POSSIBILITIES INCTHE ARC OF THE SOUTH SHORE INC: $63,626 · Human ServicesTHE ARC OF THE SOUTH SHORE INCFRIENDSHIP HOME INC: $54,400 · Human ServicesFRIENDSHIP HOME INCPRESERVATION WORCESTER INC: $45,000 · Arts & CultureSPECIAL OLYMPICS INC: $31,000 · Recreation & SportsFACE (FOUNDATION FOR ADVANCEMENT OF CHRISTIAN EDUCATION: $5,500 · Education
Other$398,948Human Services$182,026Arts & Culture$45,000Recreation & Sports$31,000Education$5,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCARDINAL CUSHING CENTERS INC: $154,474 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetHOUSE OF POSSIBILITIES INC: $64,000 over 1y, 4.1% of budgetTHE ARC OF THE SOUTH SHORE INC: $63,626 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetFRIENDSHIP HOME INC: $54,400 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetNORTHEAST ARC INC: $50,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetPRESERVATION WORCESTER INC: $45,000 over 1y, 15% of budgetSPECIAL OLYMPICS INC: $31,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFACE Inc: $6,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetFACE (FOUNDATION FOR ADVANCEMENT OF CHRISTIAN EDUCATION: $5,500 over 1y, 1.8% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds CARDINAL CUSHING CENTERS INC ↗
  • Who funds HOUSE OF POSSIBILITIES INC ↗
  • Who funds THE ARC OF THE SOUTH SHORE INC ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDSHIP HOME INC ↗
  • Who funds NORTHEAST ARC INC ↗
  • Who funds PRESERVATION WORCESTER INC ↗
  • Who funds SPECIAL OLYMPICS INC ↗
  • Who funds FACE Inc ↗
  • Who funds FACE (FOUNDATION FOR ADVANCEMENT OF CHRISTIAN EDUCATION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Rockland Trust Charitable Foundation IncMA19.7× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Rockland Trust Charitable Foundation Inc · Eastern Bank Foundation · The Roessner Family Foundation Inc · The Doug Flutie Jr Foundation for Autism Inc · Arbella Insurance Foundation · Imagine Inc · Yawkey Foundation II · American Endowment Foundation · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Network for Good · American Online Giving Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Knights of Columbus Massachusetts State Council Charity Fund funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Knights of Columbus Massachusetts State Council Charity Fund. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from government →median 73%
  • The Arc of the South Shore Inc: 78% of income from government
  • House of Possibilities Inc: 76% of income from government
  • Northeast Arc Inc: 73% of income from government
  • Friendship Home Inc: 66% of income from government
  • Cardinal Cushing Centers Inc: 40% of income from government
  • Preservation Worcester Inc: 10% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
4rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Knights of Columbus Massachusetts State Council Charity Fund?

Find your warmest path to Knights of Columbus Massachusetts State Council Charity Fund through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 27 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Knights of Columbus Massachusetts State Council Charity’s filings →

More from the funding graph