Skip to content

· Private foundation

Klionsky Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$47k
Granted FY2025still arriving
7
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$30k
Largest
01What it funds
0191% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Education$135kHuman Services$57kInternational$17kReligion$14kYouth Development$7kEmployment$2kRecreation & Sports$2kAnimals$1kOther$0
02FY2025 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k5 grants · $8k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $40k
$1,800
Median grant
4
States reached
$784k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
AMERICANS FOR BEN GURION UNIVERSITY$29,500
THE ISRAEL ADVOCACY GROUP$10,000
CHABAD OF GREATER HILTON HEAD$2,700
AMERICAN FRIENDS OF YESHIVAT MIGDAL HATORAH$1,800
CHABAD OF DOWNTOWN AUSTIN$1,500
BEACH CATS SAILORS OF HHI INC$1,000
CONGREGATION POALE ZEDECK$500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY20–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 93% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%THE ISRAEL ADVOCACY GROUP: $10k → 7%SHAARE TORAH CONGREGATION: $3k → 11%AMERICAN FRIENDS OF YESHIVAT MIGDAL HATORAH: $2k → 13%AMERICANS FOR BEN-GURION UNIVERSITY: $40k → 17%CHABAD OF DOWNTOWN AUSTIN: $2k → 10%CHABAD OF GREATER HILTON HEAD: $3k → 10%US HOLOCAUST MUSEUM: $500 → 14%ZABS PLACE: $1k → 10%CAMP YOUNG JUDEA MIDWEST: $1k → 14%CHABAD LUBAVITCH OF ALEXANDRIA ARLINGTON: $1k → 7%THE ISRAEL ADVOCACY GROUP: $1k → 7%SHAARE TORAH CONGREGATION: $2k → 11%AMERICANS FOR BEN GURION UNIVERSITY: $35k → 17%CHABAD OF DOWNTOWN AUSTIN: $2k → 10%CHABAD OF GREATER HILTON HEAD: $600 → 10%ZABS PLACE: $1k → 10%CAMP YOUNG JUDEA MIDWEST: $1k → 14%CHABAD LUBAVITCH OF ALEXANDRIA ARLINGTON: $1k → 7%SHAARE TORAH CONGREGATION: $1k → 11%AMERICANS FOR BEN-GURION UNIVERSITY: $31k → 17%CONGREGATION POALE ZEDECK: $500 → 11%AMERICANS FOR BEN GURION UNIVERSITY: $30k → 17%YOUNG PEOPLES SYNAGOGUE: $500 → 11%FRIENDS OF THE IDF: $1k → 17%FRIENDS OF THE IDF: $1k → 17%PEF ISRAEL ENDOWMENT FUNDS INC LEAD ISRAEL YOUTH LEADERSHIP DEVELOPMENT: $4k → 17%PEF ISRAEL ENDOWMENT FUNDS INC: $2k → 17%PEF ISRAEL ENDOWMENT FUNDS INC LEAD ISRAEL YOUTH LEADERSHIP DEVELOPMENT: $1k → 17%PEF ISRAEL ENDOWMENT FUNDS INC LEAD ISRAEL YOUTH LEADERSHIP DEVELOPMENT: $1k → 17%PEF ISRAEL ENDOWMENT FUNDS INC LEAD ISRAEL YOUTH LEADERSHIP DEVELOPMENT: $1k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
NY
PA
VA
NC
SC
DC
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$234k · 12 repeat orgs$4k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +109% since the first grant, against +57% for those funded once.

12 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2025, 8 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

12
2

Total granted

$234k
$1k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+109%
+57%

Still filing today

42%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 93% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $3k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
InternationalEducationEmploymentRecreation & SportsArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AF
    AMERICANS FOR BEN-GURION UNIVERSITY INC
    4× · 2022–2025 · $135k · revenue +34%
  • ZP
    Zabs Place
    2× · 2020–2021 · $2k · revenue +467%
  • CY
    CAMP YOUNG JUDAEA MIDWEST INC
    2× · 2020–2021 · $2k · revenue +109%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2022 · $500
  • TU
    The United States Holocaust Memorial Museumgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $500 · revenue +57%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Voices United for Israel

Educational information regarding Israel and the Middle East.

International
2
University of Judaism Foundation
—
3
American Friends of Yeshiva Aish Hatorah
—
4
Sherit Isroel
—
5
Idf Memorial Foundation
Philanthropy
6
Yeshiva Ohr Yisroel
Philanthropy
7
Friends of Institute for Zionist

The organization seeks to reinforce the foundations of israel as a jewish and democratic state. it acts to promote programs to educate the israeli public on the importance of both values and to demonstrate how each contributes to and…

International
8
Yeshiva University

The university is composed of several colleges and schools providing undergraduate, graduate, professional and post-doctoral education and training and research and clinical programs.

Education
9
Yad Yosef Foundation
Philanthropy
10
Bais Yisrael Foundation
—
11
American Friends of Torat Eliyahu
Philanthropy
12
Bronfman Youth Fellowships to Israel in Inc
Youth Development
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Pef Israel Endowment Funds Inc; the most unlike its peers is The United States Holocaust Memorial Museum. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 18 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
6/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

AMERICANS FOR BEN-GURION UNIVERSITY INC: $135,000 · EducationAMERICANS FOR BEN-GURION UNIVERSITY INCFRANKLIN & MARSHALL: $57,000 · OtherFRANKLIN & MARSHALLPEF ISRAEL ENDOWMENT FUNDS INC LEAD ISRAEL YOUTH LEADERSHIP DEVELOPMENT: $6,500 · OtherPEF ISRAEL ENDOWMENT FUNDS INC LEAD ISR…SHAARE TORAH CONGREGATION: $5,000 · OtherSHAARE TORAH CONGREGATIONIndividual grant recipient: $4,000 · OtherCHABAD OF DOWNTOWN AUSTIN INC: $3,660 · OtherCHABAD OF GREATER HILTON HEAD: $3,300 · Other+4 more: $4,000 · OtherTHE ISRAEL ADVOCACY GROUP: $11,250 · InternationalFRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL DEFENSE FORCES: $2,000 · InternationalAMERICAN FRIENDS OF YESHIVAT MIGDAL HATORAH INC: $1,800 · InternationalZabs Place: $2,000 · EmploymentPEF ISRAEL ENDOWMENT FUNDS INC: $2,000 · PhilanthropyCAMP YOUNG JUDAEA MIDWEST INC: $2,000 · Recreation & SportsThe United States Holocaust Memorial Museum: $500 · Arts & Culture
Education$135,000Other$83,460International$15,050Employment$2,000Philanthropy$2,000Recreation & Sports$2,000Arts & Culture$500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetAMERICANS FOR BEN-GURION UNIVERSITY INC: $135,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetTHE ISRAEL ADVOCACY GROUP: $11,250 over 2y, 3.2% of budgetZabs Place: $2,000 over 2y, 1.3% of budgetPEF ISRAEL ENDOWMENT FUNDS INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCAMP YOUNG JUDAEA MIDWEST INC: $2,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL DEFENSE FORCES: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetThe United States Holocaust Memorial Museum: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds AMERICANS FOR BEN-GURION UNIVERSITY INC ↗
  • Who funds THE ISRAEL ADVOCACY GROUP ↗
  • Who funds Zabs Place ↗
  • Who funds PEF ISRAEL ENDOWMENT FUNDS INC ↗
  • Who funds CAMP YOUNG JUDAEA MIDWEST INC ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL DEFENSE FORCES ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF YESHIVAT MIGDAL HATORAH INC ↗
  • Who funds The United States Holocaust Memorial Museum ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

American Endowment FoundationOH9.3× affinity4 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: American Endowment Foundation · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Klionsky Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Klionsky Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Klionsky Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Klionsky Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 18 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Klionsky’s filings →

    More from the funding graph