Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Kiwanis Foundation of Easton

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$31k
Granted FY2025still arriving
14
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$6k
Largest
01What you fund
0191% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Human Services$38kYouth Development$33kRecreation & Sports$29kEducation$27kCommunity Improvement$15kHealth$7kArts & Culture$7kHousing & Shelter$6kOther$0
02FY2025 · 14 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$1,500
Median grant
4
States reached
$269k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
River Crossing YMCA of Easton$6,274
Easton Area Community Center$5,000
Wilson Area Linc Family Center$5,000
Project of Easton$4,000
Kiwanis Club of Easton$2,221
University of Alabama$1,500
Mt St Mary University$1,500
Orlando Flight Center$1,500
Northampton Community College$1,500
Family Connection$1,400
Individual grant recipient$500
Team Northampton Special Olympics$500
Big Brothers Sisters of the LV$300
Individual grant recipient$250
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $17k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%Equil-librium: $2k → 11%Equil-librium: $250 → 11%Project of Easton: $5k → 11%Family Connection of Easton: $5k → 11%Project of Easton: $4k → 11%Easton Area Neighborhood Center: $300 → 11%Family Connection of Easton: $250 → 11%Family Connection of Easton: $250 → 11%PROJECT OF EASTON: $250 → 11%Project of Easton: $180 → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

66%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$111k · 19 repeat orgs$57k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +28% since the first grant, against +21% for the ones you funded once.

19 repeat relationships — 6 still active in FY2025, 13 since wound down; 8 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

19
34

Total granted

$111k
$44k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+28%
+21%

Still filing today

47%
15%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 57% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $14k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesEducationHealthYouth DevelopmentCommunity ImprovementHousing & ShelterOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SA
    ST ANTHONY'S YOUTH CENTER OF EASTON PA INC
    5× · 2021–2025 · $22k · revenue +105%
  • PO
    PROJECT OF EASTON INC
    4× · 2018–2025 · $9k · revenue +82%
  • WA
    WILSON AREA LINCS FAMILY CENTER INC
    2× · 2024–2025 · $8k · revenue +25%

Funded once

  • BA
    BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF EASTON INC
    one grant, 2020 · $12k · revenue +13%
  • NC
    Northampton County Historical Society
    one grant, 2023 · $3k
  • SH
    SAFE HARBOR EASTON INC
    one grant, 2024 · $3k · revenue -3%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Easton Area Public Library

The mission of the library is to promote literacy, to advance lifelong learning, and to contribute to the development of an active and informed community of citizens.

Education
2
East Boston Social Centers Inc

At east boston social centers, we cultivate community, belonging, and joy for east boston residents and our neighbors, through services to support children, families, and individuals of all ages.

Human Services
3
East Cleveland Neighborhood Center

To address the needs of children and families by providing enrichment programs that promote resilience, social and emotional wellness, academic preparation skills, and parent engagement.

Human Services
4
Easton Community Center Inc

To provide cultural, educational, recreational and social opportunities to the residents of the greater easton community and to design and implement creative and high quality programs which will enhance the mental and physical well being…

Philanthropy
5
Easthampton Learning Foundation
Education
6
E-Town Area Youth Alliance

Eatc engages in initiatives and strategies that address relevant issues and challenges which lead, or may lead, to high risk behaviors within our community. eatc envisions the elizabethtown area school district as a place where children,…

Youth Development
7
East Side Early Learning Center

The center provides quality care and education to children of working parents and is licensed to care for 44 children from ages 6 weeks to 5 years old.

Human Services
8
East Wayne Street Center Inc

East wayne street center is a nonprofit organization focused on strengthening families and individuals, empowering them to become self- sufficient through academic and vocational education.

Education
9
Easton Foundation
Philanthropy
10
Elizabeth's Early Learning Center Inc

To provide every child with affectionate and personalized care in a safe environment. we focus on providing for the physical, social, emotional, and cognitive development needs of children in an age-appropriate manner.

Human Services
11
Easter Seals Eastern Pennsylvania

Easter seals eastern pa creates life-changing solutions for individuals with disablities and their families in their community by increasing independence, maximizing opportunities, minimizing barriers and enhancing quality of life.

Health
12
Easton Sports Development Foundation
Philanthropy

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Erie Homes for Children & Adults Inc and the most unlike its peers is Personalized Books Given to Children Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

15 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 15 of the 61 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
14/15
Grantees still filing
12/15
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

ST ANTHONY'S YOUTH CENTER OF EASTON PA INC — $22,000 · OtherST ANTHONY'S YOUTH CENTER OF EASTON PA INC3rd Street Alliance — $15,200 · Other3rd Street AllianceKiwanis Club of Easton — $8,046 · OtherKiwanis Club of EastonNCHGS — $7,500 · OtherNCHGSRiver Crossing YMCA of Easton — $6,274 · OtherRiver Crossing YMCA of EastonBoy & Girls Club of Easton — $5,447 · OtherGreater Valley YMCA of Easton — $5,000 · Other+42 more — $45,294 · Other+42 morePROJECT OF EASTON INC — $9,430 · Human ServicesPROJECT OF …FAMILY CONNECTION OF EASTON INC — $5,500 · Human ServicesFAMILY CONN…EQUI-LIBRIUM INC — $2,250 · Human ServicesEQUI-LIBRIU…+1 more — $300 · Human ServicesWILSON AREA LINCS FAMILY CENTER INC — $7,650 · EducationLAFAYETTE COLLEGE — $4,500 · EducationThe Foundation for Easton Schools — $500 · EducationBOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF EASTON INC — $12,067 · Youth DevelopmentRECOVERY REVOLUTION INC — $6,500 · Health+1 more — $200 · HealthSAFE HARBOR EASTON INC — $3,000 · Housing & ShelterTHE NURTURE NATURE CENTER — $2,000 · Community Improvement
Other$114,761Human Services$17,480Education$12,650Youth Development$12,067Health$6,700Housing & Shelter$3,000Community Improvement$2,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetST ANTHONY'S YOUTH CENTER OF EASTON PA INC — $22,000 over 5y, 2.0% of budgetBOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF EASTON INC — $12,067 over 1y, 2.3% of budgetPROJECT OF EASTON INC — $9,430 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetWILSON AREA LINCS FAMILY CENTER INC — $7,650 over 2y, 2.9% of budgetRECOVERY REVOLUTION INC — $6,500 over 4y, 0.7% of budgetFAMILY CONNECTION OF EASTON INC — $5,500 over 3y, 0.7% of budgetLAFAYETTE COLLEGE — $4,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSAFE HARBOR EASTON INC — $3,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetEQUI-LIBRIUM INC — $2,250 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetTHE NURTURE NATURE CENTER — $2,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetPersonalized Books Given to Children Inc — $1,500 over 2y, 1.9% of budgetBIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF THE LEHIGH VALLEY INC — $800 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetThe Foundation for Easton Schools — $500 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetEASTON AREA NEIGHBORHOOD CENTERS INC — $300 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetERIE HOMES FOR CHILDREN & ADULTS INC — $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds ST ANTHONY'S YOUTH CENTER OF EASTON PA INC
  • Who funds BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF EASTON INC
  • Who funds PROJECT OF EASTON INC
  • Who funds WILSON AREA LINCS FAMILY CENTER INC
  • Who funds RECOVERY REVOLUTION INC
  • Who funds FAMILY CONNECTION OF EASTON INC
  • Who funds LAFAYETTE COLLEGE
  • Who funds SAFE HARBOR EASTON INC
  • Who funds EQUI-LIBRIUM INC
  • Who funds THE NURTURE NATURE CENTER
  • Who funds Personalized Books Given to Children Inc
  • Who funds BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF THE LEHIGH VALLEY INC
  • Who funds The Foundation for Easton Schools

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Lehigh Valley Community FoundationPA26.1× affinity10 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Lehigh Valley Community Foundation · United Way of the Greater Lehigh Valley · Two Rivers Health & Wellness Foundation · Air Products Foundation · Martin D Cohen Family Foundation · Frederick H Bedford Jr & Margaret S Bedford Charitable Foundation · John a and Margaret Post Foundation · William H and Patti a Lehr Foundation · The Brown-Daub Foundation · The Richardson Foundation · Leona Gruber Charitable Trust · Sylvia Perkin Perpetual Charitable Trust

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Kiwanis Foundation of Easton funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Kiwanis Foundation of Easton?

    Find your warmest path to Kiwanis Foundation of Easton through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 61 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph