Skip to content
Kiwanis Club of Williamsburg at a glance

· Public charity

Kiwanis Club of Williamsburg

The mission of the KIWANIS CLUB OF WILLIAMSBURG is to improve the quality of life through service, fellowship, knowledge and financial resources.

$63k
Granted FY2023
5
Grants FY2023
1
States reached
$13k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2023.

Health$41kArts & Culture$40kHuman Services$35kYouth Development$15kFood & Nutrition$13kCivil Rights$13kPhilanthropy$9kEducation$7k
02FY2023 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 5 grants below total $60,000, the rows itemized in this filing. The $62,750 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $2,750 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2023

  • Under $10k1 grant · $9k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $51k
$12,750
Median grant
1
States reached
$26k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
GROVE CHRISTIAN OUTREACH CENTER$12,750
FRIENDS OF WRL$12,750
COLONIAL CASA$12,750
DREAM CATCHERS$12,750
ARC OF GREATER WILLIAMSBURG$9,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–23, $44k) land where the poverty rate runs at 7%, against an area that typically sits at 6%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 6%GROVE CHRISTIAN OUTREACH CENTER: $13k → 7%AVALON: $9k → 7%GROVE CHRISTIAN OUTREACH CENTER: $7k → 7%ARC OF GREATER WILLIAMSBURG: $9k → 7%LATISHA'S HOUSE FOUNDATION: $7k → 7%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 100% of Kiwanis Club of Williamsburg’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 100% of the giving stays in VA; by stated purpose, 0%.

Kiwanis Club of Williamsburglessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Newport News Court Appointed Special Advocates Inc

Advocate for abused and neglected children

Crime & Legal
2
Center for Child and Family Services Inc

To deliver quality counseling programs and support services that empower individuals and families to improve their lives. the center provided counseling and support services to over 3,000 people in the areas of behavioral health services,…

Human Services
3
Ywca of Central Virginia

The ywca is dedicated to eliminating racism, empowering women, and promoting peace, justice, dignity, and freedom for all.

Human Services
4
Wetzel-Tyler Child Advocacy Center

To reduce the traumatic effects of abuse, protect children from maltreatment, seek justice for child victims, investigate abuse and strengthen the communitys awareness.

Human Services
5
Crossroads Community Services Board

To operate mental health, intellectual disability, and substance abuse programs.

Health
6
Williamsburg Community Child Care Center

To provide high quality learning experiences for children ages six weeks to sixth grade. This will allow us to strengthen the connection between home and our center to provide the best environment for each child.

Human Services
7
Transitions Family Violence Services

The mission of transitions family violence services (tfvs) is to build safe and healthy families on the virginia peninsula by providing services to adult and child victims of domestic violence and human trafficking. we work to increase…

—
8
Virginias House a Family Resource Center
Human Services
9
Williamsburg Area Chamber of Commerce

To enhance, promote, and serve the business communities of the city of williamsburg, virginia, james city county, virginia, the bruton district of york county, virginia, and the yorktown, virginia waterfront.

—
10
For Children's Sake of Virginia Inc

For children's sake is dedicated to promoting positive environments for children and families that develop trust, stability and independence.

Human Services
11
Prevent Child Abuse Virginia

To advance programs, practices, and policies that nurture children, empower families, and support communities.

—
12
Williamsburg Infant and Early Childhood Development center inc

Williamsburg infant and early childhood development center, inc. d/b/a eis laasois child development services (the "center") is located in brooklyn, new york. the center provides educational services and various therapies under contracts…

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Bacon Street Youth and Family Svcs; the most unlike its peers is One Child Center for Autism. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 13 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/12
Grantees still filing
8/12
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

MEALS ON WHEELS: $12,839 · OtherMEALS ON WHEELSBACON STREET YOUTH AND FAMILY SVCS: $12,839 · OtherBACON STREET YOUTH AND FAMILY SVCSDREAM CATCHERS: $12,750 · OtherDREAM CATCHERSBIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS INC: $8,949 · OtherBIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS INCKIWANIS CLUB FOUNDATION OF WILLIAMSBURG: $6,000 · OtherKIWANIS CLUB FOUNDATION OF WILLIAMS…FRIENDS OF WILLIAMSBURG REGIONAL LIBRARY FOUNDATION: $48,935 · PhilanthropyFRIENDS OF WILLIAMSBURG REGIONAL…GROVE CHRISTIAN OUTREACH CENTER: $19,252 · Human ServicesGROVE CHRISTIAN OUTREACH CEN…THE ARC OF GREATER WILLIAMSBURG: $9,000 · Human ServicesTHE ARC OF GREATER WILLIAMSB…AVALON A CENTER FOR WOMEN AND CHILDREN: $8,949 · Human ServicesAVALON A CENTER FOR WOMEN AN…Latishas House Foundation: $6,502 · Human ServicesLatishas House FoundationCOLONIAL COURT APPOINTED SPECIAL ADVOCATE PROGRAM INC: $12,750 · Civil RightsRITA WELSH ADULT LITERACY PROGRAM INC: $6,502 · EducationONE CHILD CENTER FOR AUTISM: $6,502 · Health
Other$53,377Philanthropy$48,935Human Services$43,703Civil Rights$12,750Education$6,502Health$6,502

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetFRIENDS OF WILLIAMSBURG REGIONAL LIBRARY FOUNDATION: $48,935 over 5y, 3.2% of budgetGROVE CHRISTIAN OUTREACH CENTER: $19,252 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetBACON STREET YOUTH AND FAMILY SVCS: $12,839 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetCOLONIAL COURT APPOINTED SPECIAL ADVOCATE PROGRAM INC: $12,750 over 1y, 5.1% of budgetDREAM CATCHERS: $12,750 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetTHE ARC OF GREATER WILLIAMSBURG: $9,000 over 1y, 1.8% of budgetBIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS INC: $8,949 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetAVALON A CENTER FOR WOMEN AND CHILDREN: $8,949 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetRITA WELSH ADULT LITERACY PROGRAM INC: $6,502 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetLatishas House Foundation: $6,502 over 1y, 1.7% of budgetONE CHILD CENTER FOR AUTISM: $6,502 over 1y, 2.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Greater Williamsburg …Langley for Families …Dominion Energy Chari…Williamsburg Communit…United Way of the Vir…Peninsula Community F…Rotary Club of Willia…Han Zhang and Jinlan …Sentara HealthThe Community Foundat…The Bank of America C…American Online Givin…
Greater Williamsburg Community TrustVA26.3× affinity10 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Greater Williamsburg Community Trust · Langley for Families - the Foundation of Lfcu · Dominion Energy Charitable Foundation · Williamsburg Community Health Foundation · United Way of the Virginia Peninsula · Peninsula Community Foundation of Virginia Inc · Rotary Club of Williamsburg Foundation Inc · Han Zhang and Jinlan Liu Foundation · Sentara Health · The Community Foundation Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Kiwanis Club of Williamsburg funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Kiwanis Club of Williamsburg. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 13 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2023, released 2023. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2024) is on record and reports $22k of grant expense, but none of it to a named recipient. On a Form 990 that can mean grants abroad, filed by region only (Schedule F), grants under $5,000, which are not itemized, or a schedule referenced as an attachment the e-file does not carry. The figures above are therefore from FY2023, the most recent year this funder named its grantees.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Kiwanis Club of Williamsburg’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home