Skip to content

· Public charity

Kiwanis Club of Fayette County

The organization supports local organizations and local causes for adults and children

$92k
Granted FY2023
3
Grants FY2023
1
States reached
$25k
Largest
01What it funds
0188% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2023.

Health$188kHuman Services$50kYouth Development$31kReligion$18kEducation$10kPublic Safety & Disaster$2kPublic Benefit$250Other$0
02FY2023 · 3 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 3 grants below total $58,076, the rows itemized in this filing. The $91,932 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $33,856 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.
$22,206
Median grant
1
States reached
$107k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
PIEDMONT HEALTHCARE FOUNDATIO$25,000
FAYETTE CARE CLINIC$22,206
FLINT RIVER COUNCIL$10,870
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–22, $68k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 26% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%ST VINCENTdePAUL: $7k → 14%Bloom our Youth: $50k → 6%ST VINCENT DPAUL: $6k → 14%St V de Paul: $5k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

27%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$98k · 4 repeat orgs$271k to everyone else

4 repeat relationships: 2 still active in FY2023, 2 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2023 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

4
10

Total granted

$98k
$246k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

-26%
+101%

Still filing today

75%
40%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 57% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $25k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23
HealthHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • FC
    Fayette CARE Clinic Inc
    2× · 2022–2023 · $40k · revenue -79%
  • FC
    Fayette County School District
    2× · 2019–2020 · $25k
  • SO
    SOCIETY OF ST VINCENT DE PAUL GEORGIA INC
    3× · 2019–2022 · $18k · revenue +98%

Funded once

  • PH
    Piedmont Healthcare Incgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $100k · revenue +101%
  • BO
    BLOOM OUR YOUTH INCgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $50k · revenue +213%
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    2× · 2021–2022 · $34k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Fayette Community Hospital Inc

To provide healthcare marked by compassion and sustainable excellence in a progressive environment, guided by physicians, delivered by exceptional professionals, and inspired by the communities we serve.

Health
2
Piedmont Hospital Inc

To provide healthcare marked by compassion and sustainable excellence in a progressive environment, guided by physicians, delivered by exceptional professionals, and inspired by the communities we serve.

Health
3
Piedmont Henry Hospital Inc

To provide healthcare marked by compassion and sustainable excellence in a progressive environment, guided by physicians, delivered by exceptional professionals, and inspired by the communities we serve.

Health
4
Piedmont Mountainside Hospital Inc

To provide healthcare marked by compassion and sustainable excellence in a progressive environment, guided by physicians, delivered by professionals, and inspired by the communities we serve.

Health
5
Piedmont Newnan Hospital Inc

To provide healthcare marked by compassion and sustainable excellence in a progressive environment, guided by physicians, delivered by exceptional professionals, and inspired by the communities we serve.

Health
6
Piedmont Athens Regional Medical Center Inc

The mission of piedmont athens regional medical center is to improve the lives and health of those we touch.

Health
7
The Medical Center Inc

To provide healthcare marked by compassion and sustainable excellence in a progressive environment, guided by physicians, delivered by professionals, and inspired by the communities we serve.

Health
8
University McDuffie County Regional Medical Center Inc

To provide healthcare marked by compassion and sustainable excellence in a progressive environment, guided by physicians, delivered by exceptional professionals, and inspired by the communities we serve.

Health
9
Piedmont Heart Institute Inc

Piedmont heart institute, inc., was formed by piedmont healthcare, inc., to advance cardiovascular research and to provide education and excellence in cardiac treatment and disease prevention.

Health
10
Columbus Ambulatory Healthcare Services Inc

To provide healthcare marked by compassion and sustainable excellence in a progressive environment, guided by physicians, delivered by professionals, and inspired by the communities we serve.

—
11
University Health Services Inc

To provide healthcare marked by compassion and sustainable excellence in a progressive environment, guided by physicians, delivered by exceptional professionals, and inspired by the communities we serve.

Health
12
Piedmont Athens Regional Foundation Inc

The corporation was organized to be operated, and at all times shall be operated, exclusively for the benefit of or to carry out the purposes of piedmont athens regional medical center, inc., and such other exempt organizations controlled…

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Piedmont Healthcare Inc; the most unlike its peers is Southside Support Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 15 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
6/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Piedmont Healthcare Inc: $100,000 · HealthPiedmont Healthcare IncFayette CARE Clinic Inc: $40,206 · HealthFayette CARE Clinic IncPiedmont Healthcare Foundation Inc: $25,000 · HealthPiedmont Healthcare Foundation Inc+1 more: $1,000 · HealthIndividual grant recipient: $34,431 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient: $28,583 · OtherIndividual grant recipientFayette County School District: $24,500 · OtherFayette County School DistrictFAYETTE CARE: $15,967 · OtherFAYETTE CAREFLINT RIVER COUNCIL INC 95 SCOUTING AMERICA: $15,770 · OtherFLINT RIVER COUNCIL INC 95 SCOUTING AMERI…Individual grant recipient: $7,631 · OtherIndividual grant recipientST VINCENT dE: $5,943 · Other+2 more: $2,600 · OtherBLOOM OUR YOUTH INC: $50,000 · Human ServicesBLOOM OUR YOUTH INCSOCIETY OF ST VINCENT DE PAUL GEORGIA INC: $18,000 · Human ServicesSOCIETY OF ST VINCEN…
Health$166,206Other$135,425Human Services$68,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetPiedmont Healthcare Inc: $100,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetFayette CARE Clinic Inc: $40,206 over 2y, 3.2% of budgetPiedmont Healthcare Foundation Inc: $25,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetSOCIETY OF ST VINCENT DE PAUL GEORGIA INC: $18,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetFLINT RIVER COUNCIL INC 95 SCOUTING AMERICA: $15,770 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetSouthside Support INC: $1,000 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetFAYETTE COUNTY CHAMBER OF COMMERCE: $850 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

United Way of Greater Atlanta IncGA13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: United Way of Greater Atlanta Inc · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Kiwanis Club of Fayette County funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Kiwanis Club of Fayette County. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Kiwanis Club of Fayette County?

    Find your warmest path to Kiwanis Club of Fayette County through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 15 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2023, released 2023. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2025) is on record but names no grant recipient (grants abroad are filed by region only, and grants under $5,000 are not itemized), so the figures above are from FY2023, the most recent year this funder named its grantees.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Kiwanis Club of Fayette County’s filings →

    More from the funding graph