Loading…
· Public charity
KIWANIS CLUB OF AA FOUNDATION INC
The foundation uses their funds to make grants to non-profit organizations that serve youth, needy citizens, seniors, and some international organizations, such as kiwanis international, and provide scholarships for college for deserving and needy individuals.
$990k
Granted FY2024
61
Grants
3
Communities
$125k
Largest
01What you fund
01
What you funded, over time
By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).
A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 60% of KIWANIS CLUB OF AA FOUNDATION INC’s grantee dollars go to organizations outside the IRS cause taxonomy (common for large international and research funders), so a chart would be mostly “unclassified” and misrepresent the portfolio.
02beneath the categories
Past the labels — and the year it shifted
Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.
…and in their own words, year by year
2022
—
2023
women'scamp
2024
churchchildren'schelseagirlscamp
2025
churchactiondistrictchelseacamp
Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.
03FY2024 · 61 grants
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k50 grants · $332k
- $10k–50k9 grants · $204k
- $50k–250k2 grants · $194k
$6,275
Median grant
3
States reached
$5.9M
Total assets
Largest grants
- WASHTENAW COMMUNITY COLLEGE$125,373
- UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN$68,275
- SAFEHOUSE CENTER$32,500
- WASHTENAW AREA COUNCIL FOR CHILDREN$31,275
- OZONE HOUSE INC$28,000
- ANN ARBOR PUBLIC SCHOOLS$25,579
- CATHOLIC CHARITIES WASHTENAW COUNTY$25,000
- KIWANIS OF MICHIGAN FOUNDATION$24,603
- HAITI NURSING FOUNDATION$14,000
- EMBRACING OUR DIFFERENCES$12,500
- CHELSEA EDUCATION FOUNDATION$10,603
- SALVATION ARMY$9,940
- RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARTIES$9,000
- MAKER WORKS COMMUNITY WORKSHOPS$7,500
- HOPE CLINIC$7,500
02The need
04
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
show:
Your human-services grants (FY24–24, $65k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14% — the area typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
03Your edge
repeat funding
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
68%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$1.2M · 18 repeat orgs$554k to everyone else
18 repeat relationships — 16 still active in FY2024, 2 since wound down; 45 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Re-uppedFunded once
Organizations
18
12
Total granted
$1.2M
$157k
Median revenue growth · since first grant
+76%
+79%
Still filing today
44%
25%
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 46% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $397k went to new ones.
RenewedFirst-time
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
Human ServicesEducationYouth DevelopmentArts & CultureHealthInternationalOther
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- UOUNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN3× · 2022–2024 · $139k · revenue +126%
- WCWASHTENAW CAMP PLACEMENT5× · 2018–2024 · $128k · revenue +73% · 41% of their budget
- HNHAITI NURSING FOUNDATION5× · 2019–2024 · $45k · revenue +125%
Funded once
- HHIGHSCOPEone grant, 2023 · $40k
- SASHELTER ASSOCIATIONone grant, 2020 · $27k
- HMHOPE MEDICAL CLINIC INCgraduatedone grant, 2020 · $26k · revenue +79%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
04Your field
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
1
The Michigan Center for Civic Education
To promote and support the development of engaged, responsible citizens. The Michigan Center for Civic Education (MCCE) strengthens constitutional democracy through authentic civic education and professional learning. MCCE advances the…
—
2
Ann Arbor Community Center Inc
With an emphasis on socio-economically disadvantaged youth and families, the Ann Arbor Community Center, Inc. (AACC) is a vital community resource that provides high quality programs, information and services to citizens in need.
—
3
The Childrens Advocacy Centers of
Our mission is to unify and strengthen michigan's response to child victims of abuse through sustainable growth, collaboration, and empowerment of children's advocacy centers (cacs). our vision is that all of michigan's children will have…
Crime & Legal
4
Michigan Child Care Centers Inc
Providing day care for children ranging from two weeks to tweleve years of age
—
5
Michigan Chamber of Commerce
To promote conditions favorable to job creation and business success in michigan.
—
6
Alumni Association of the University of Michigan
The Association is an independent worldwide organization that nurtures lifelong relationships with and among current and future Michigan alumni. As a committed partner of the University the Association offers programs of relevance and…
Education
7
Michigan Family Resources
Michigan Family Resources mission is to deliver comprehensive services to low-income children five and under and their families, promoting their wel-being and development
Education
8
Michigan Lakes and Streams
Preservation and protection of michigan inland lakes and streams
Environment
9
Association for Children's Mental Health
To help all michigan children and youth with emotional, behavioral, or mental health challenges.
Health
10
Community Action Network
The organization partners with children, youth and families from under- resourced washtenaw county neighborhoods to create better futures for themselves, and improve the communities in which they live.
Human Services
11
Center for Success Network
The organization unites literacy and community to empower students in the journey of education.
Community Improvement
12
Michigan Voices
The organization seeks to build civic engagement capacity in progressive nonprofit groups .
Civil Rights
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Washtenaw Area Council for Children and the most unlike its peers is Riverside Arts Center. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 36 years old; the field is 15. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 23% startups (under 5 years old) — 2% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.
Closures · last 5 years
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 11% of the field you don’t fund.
orgs you fund
0.0%0/42
the rest of the field
11%
259/2,264
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
05the grantee network
38 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.
1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
20
Early backer (in before they grew)
38/38
Grantees still filing
32/38
Grew since you first funded
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Other$1,068,333Education$497,573Human Services$65,375International$44,510Arts & Culture$18,775Youth Development$18,550Health$13,775
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds WASHTENAW COMMUNITY COLLEGE ↗
- Who funds UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN ↗
- Who funds WASHTENAW CAMP PLACEMENT ↗
- Who funds KIWANIS OF MICHIGAN FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds HAITI NURSING FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds FOOD GATHERERS ↗
- Who funds WASHTENAW AREA COUNCIL FOR CHILDREN ↗
- Who funds OZONE HOUSE INC ↗
- Who funds HOPE MEDICAL CLINIC INC ↗
- Who funds CAMP CAVELL CONSERVANCY ↗
- Who funds EMBRACING OUR DIFFERENCES ↗
- Who funds GIRLS GROUP ↗
- Who funds CHELSEA EDUCATION FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds JOYCE IVY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds MAKER WORKS COMMUNITY WORKSHOPS ↗
- Who funds GARRETT'S SPACE ↗
- Who funds MICHIGAN DISTRICT OF KEY CLUB ↗
- Who funds JEWISH FAMILY SERVICES OF WASHTENAW ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Ann Arbor Area Community FoundationMI57.9× affinity25 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →
Open a dossier: Ann Arbor Area Community Foundation · United Way of Washtenaw County · Harry a and Margaret D Towsley · Community Foundation for Southeast · Edward F Redies Foundation Inc · James a and Faith Knight Foundation · Speckhard-Knight Charitable Foundation · Dte Energy Foundation · United Way for Southeastern Michigan · Thrift Shop Association of Ann Arbor · The Buhr Foundation · The Martin Family Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organisation KIWANIS CLUB OF AA FOUNDATION INC funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
2024
’20’21’22’23’24
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
typical government reliance, FY20–24
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
05Through Plinth
Through Plinth
Your grantmaking, live and operational
This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: WASHTENAW CAMP PLACEMENT.
Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk
Financial management
medium risk
~6 months of operating runway; revenue grew over 7 filed years.
Track record & reputation
low risk
7 years of Form 990 filings, still active; revenue up +73% since.
Legal standing
low risk
US 501(c)(3); EIN 382071695 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.
Governance
Live in Plinth
Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.
Compliance & sanctions
Live in Plinth
OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.
Program capacity
Live in Plinth
Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.
Live · Plinth’s real DD engine
Run the actual assessment on WASHTENAW CAMP PLACEMENT, cold from public data.
Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.
Post-award monitoring · continuous checks
- WatchFinancial stability— Roughly 6 months of cash on hand.
- On trackSustained operations— Filing through 2024; revenue grew over the period.
- WatchReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 41% of their budget — load-bearing; a dependency Plinth would track.
- Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.
What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.
Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing
Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro
How do I get to Kiwanis Club of Aa Foundation Inc?
Find your warmest path to Kiwanis Club of Aa Foundation Inc through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.
Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.
More from the funding graph
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars pass through an intermediary
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
Strange bedfellows
the named clusters of US funding
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home
State money flows
the interactive map of money crossing state lines