Skip to content

· Private foundation

Kit Kienstra Charitable Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$70k
Granted FY2024still arriving
11
Grants FY2024still arriving
5
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2023 to 2024.

Philanthropy$33kReligion$32kHealth$25kHuman Services$18kHousing & Shelter$2kYouth Development$2k
02FY2024 · 11 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k5 grants · $10k
  • $10k–50k6 grants · $60k
$10,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
PROVIDENCE HOUSE$10,000
Individual grant recipient$10,000
CARMEL OF ST JOSEPH$10,000
ST ANN'S CATHOLIC CHURCH$10,000
COMMUNITY PREGNANCY CENTER$10,000
ST VINCENT DE PAUL SOCIETY - ST ANSLEM$10,000
YOUTH HAVEN$5,000
THE THEODORE A KIENSTRA FOUNDATION$2,047
ABILITY DSFC INC$2,000
THE SNOW FOUNDATION$500
SFYF FOUNDATION$500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY23–24, $11k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 45% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 11%FRIENDS OF KIDS WITH CANCER: $1k → 11%YOUTH HAVEN: $5k → 10%HEALTHNETWORK FOUNDATION: $5k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Johns Hopkins All Children's Hospital Inc

Mission: johns hopkins all children's hospital (all children's), a member of johns hopkins medicine, strives to provide the highest quality care to improve the health of our entire community through innovation, collaboration, service…

Health
2
Children's Health Care

We champion the health needs of children and families. we are committed to improving children's health by providing the highest-quality, family centered care, advanced through research and education.

Health
3
St Joseph's Hospital of Tampa Foundation Inc

St. joseph's hospitals foundation secures, manages and stewards philanthropic support to benefit the health care mission of st. joseph's hospital, st. joseph's women's hospital, st. joseph's children's hospital of tampa, st. joseph's…

Health
4
Curesearch for Children's Cancer

Curesearch's mission is to fund & support targeted & innovative cancer research with measurable results, & to be the authoritative source of information & resources for all those affected by children's cancer. see schedule o for…

Health
5
Lucile Packard Foundation for Children's Health

The lucile packard foundation for children's health is here to unlock philanthropy to transform health for all kids and moms, in northern california and around the world. our foundation raises funds for child and maternal health at lucile…

Health
6
Pediatric Specialty Group Inc

Pediatric specialty group, inc. (d/b/a nicklaus children's pediatric specialists ("ncps")) is a physician-directed, multi-specialty pediatric group with a regional, national, and international presence in providing pediatric-centric care…

—
7
Children's Hospital & Research Center At Oakland

The mission of children's hospital & research center at oakland is to protect and advance the health and well-being of children through clinical care, teaching and research.

Health
8
The Krauss Foundation for Health and Humanity
International
9
The Kortney Rose Foundation Inc

The mission of the kortney rose foundation is to eradicate pediatric brain tumors by funding the world's most promising, collaborative research

—
10
Rush Medical Foundation

To provide acute, emergency and outpatient health care to persons in lauderdale county, mississipi and the surrounding area.

Health
11
Francis P Chiaramonte Md Family Foundation Inc
Human Services
12
The Diller-Von Furstenberg Family Foundation
Philanthropy
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Healthnetwork Foundation Fka Health Net Foundation Inc; the most unlike its peers is The Theodore a Kienstra Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 22 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
6/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Individual grant recipient: $20,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientCARMEL OF ST JOSEPH: $10,000 · OtherCARMEL OF ST JOSEPHST VINCENT DE PAUL SOCIETY - ST ANSLEM: $10,000 · OtherST VINCENT DE PAUL SOCIETY - ST ANSLEMPROVIDENCE HOUSE INC: $10,000 · OtherPROVIDENCE HOUSE INCST ANN'S CATHOLIC CHURCH: $10,000 · OtherST ANN'S CATHOLIC CHURCHCOMMUNITY PREGNANCY CENTER: $10,000 · OtherCOMMUNITY PREGNANCY CENTERIndividual grant recipient: $5,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientMIGHTY OAKS FOUNDATIONS: $5,000 · OtherMIGHTY OAKS FOUNDATIONS+8 more: $12,500 · Other+8 moreYOUTH HAVEN INC: $5,000 · Human ServicesYOUTH HAVEN…HEALTHNETWORK FOUNDATION FKA HEALTH NET FOUNDATION INC: $5,000 · Human ServicesHEALTHNETWO…FRIENDS OF KIDS WITH CANCER: $1,000 · Human ServicesFRIENDS OF …DRAVET SYNDROME FOUNDATION INC: $5,000 · PhilanthropyTHE THEODORE A KIENSTRA FOUNDATION: $2,047 · PhilanthropyTHE SNOW FOUNDATION: $500 · Philanthropy
Other$92,500Human Services$11,000Philanthropy$7,547

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetPROVIDENCE HOUSE INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetDRAVET SYNDROME FOUNDATION INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetYOUTH HAVEN INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetHEALTHNETWORK FOUNDATION FKA HEALTH NET FOUNDATION INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE THEODORE A KIENSTRA FOUNDATION: $2,047 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetRURAL PARISH CLINIC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetFRIENDS OF KIDS WITH CANCER: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE SNOW FOUNDATION: $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds PROVIDENCE HOUSE INC ↗
  • Who funds DRAVET SYNDROME FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds YOUTH HAVEN INC ↗
  • Who funds HEALTHNETWORK FOUNDATION FKA HEALTH NET FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds THE THEODORE A KIENSTRA FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds RURAL PARISH CLINIC ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF KIDS WITH CANCER ↗
  • Who funds THE SNOW FOUNDATION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Theodore a Kienstra FoundationMO13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Theodore a Kienstra Foundation · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Kit Kienstra Charitable Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Kit Kienstra Charitable Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Youth Haven Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
04Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Kit Kienstra Charitable Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Kit Kienstra Charitable Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 22 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Kit Kienstra’s filings →

More from the funding graph