Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Kissel Family Foundation Inc

$17k
Granted FY2020
12
Grants FY2020
2
States reached
$13k
Largest
01What you fund
0189% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172020.

Religion$29kHousing & Shelter$13kEducation$8kHuman Services$7kArts & Culture$1kAnimals$1kCommunity Improvement$500Environment$410Other$0
02FY2020 · 12 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2020

  • Under $10k11 grants · $4k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $13k
$200
Median grant
2
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
OUR LADY STAR OF THE SEA$13,075
GOOD SAMARITAN NETWORK INC$2,000
Individual grant recipient$500
FAMILY RENEW COMMUNITY$500
SALVATION ARMY$500
COUNCIL ON AGING OF VOLUSIA CTY$200
CAMP BOGGY CREEK$100
WINTER PARK DAY NURSERY$100
WMFE$100
HABITAT FOR HUMANITY$100
FRIENDS OF THE NEW SMYRNA BEACH$60
OUR DAILY BREAD MINISTRIES$25
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY18–20, $14k) land where the poverty rate runs at 18%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%GOOD SAMARITAN NETWORK INC: $6k → 19%GOOD SAMARITAN NETWORK INC: $5k → 19%ADA JENKINS CENTER: $500 → 10%GOOD SAMARITAN NETWORK INC: $2k → 19%CESC INC: $500 → 19%WINTER PARK DAY NURSERY: $100 → 13%WINTER PARK DAY NURSERY: $100 → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

NH
MI
NY
WV
VA
TN
NC
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

77%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$50k · 15 repeat orgs$15k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +75% since the first grant, against -3% for the ones you funded once.

15 repeat relationships — 9 still active in FY2020, 6 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2020 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

15
20

Total granted

$50k
$14k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+75%
-3%

Still filing today

40%
35%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2020, 95% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $800 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20
Human ServicesEducationHealthArts & CultureEnvironmentAnimalsOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • GS
    GOOD SAMARITAN NETWORK INC
    3× · 2018–2020 · $13k · revenue +43%
  • AA
    Anas Angels Inc
    2× · 2017–2018 · $1k · revenue +170%
  • FR
    FAMILY RENEW COMMUNITY INC
    4× · 2017–2020 · $800 · revenue +82%

Funded once

  • TU
    THE UNIVERSITY OF CHARLESTON INC
    one grant, 2019 · $5k · revenue -3%
  • KC
    KEARNEY CENTER
    one grant, 2017 · $3k
  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF CENTRAL FLORIDA FOUNDATION INC
    one grant, 2018 · $1k · revenue +19%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Central Florida Kidney Centers Inc

Our mission is to provide exceptional dialysis care and services to individuals with end-stage kidney disease throughout central florida. we are dedicated to expanding access to treatment and ensuring all those in need receive quality…

Health
2
Community First Credit Union of Florida

Community first credit union of florida's mission is to provide the highest in quality financial solutions for every stage of life.

3
Florida Community Health Centers Inc

Florida community health centers, inc. (fchc) is a federally qualified health center serving medically needy populations in south florida, with an emphasis on serving rural and farm worker communities.

4
Coalition for the Homeless of Central Florida Inc

The purpose of the organization is to transform the lives of homeless men, women, and children by providing crucial services to end their crisis of homelessness.

5
Central Florida Commission On Homelessness Inc

The corporation is organized for the purpose of permanently reducing the number of homeless individuals and families in the central florida region.

6
United Way of Charlotte County Inc

Mobilizing the power of our community to break the cycle of poverty.

Philanthropy
7
St Francis House

Empowering families with chidren to achieve permanent and stable self-sufficiency by providing case management; nutritious meals; and educational, health and career resources; in a safe and secure environment.

Housing & Shelter
8
Catholic Charities of Northwest Florida

Catholic charities carries out the social mission of the catholic church in northwest florida to serve, empower, and advocate for vulnerable families and individuals of any race, religion, or national origin.

9
Christian Care Center Inc

Transformed lives leading to stronger families and real life in Christ

Human Services
10
Ability Housing Inc

The mission of ability housing is to build flourishing communities where everyone has a home. its vision is a society where housing is a right, not a privilege; and all individuals have safe, affordable housing in vibrant communities. it…

Health
11
United Way of North Central Florida Inc

United Way North Central Florida seeks to improve lives by mobilizing the caring power of communities around North Central Florida to advance the common good.

Philanthropy
12
Volusiaflagler County Coalition for the Homeless Inc

Charitable or educational purposes related to services for persons experiencing homelessness and persons at risk of homelessness in the service area. in pursuance of the foregoing purposes, vfcch shall facilitate and coordinate the…

Human Services

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Council On Aging of Volusia County Inc and the most unlike its peers is God's Bathhouse of Volusia. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 38 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
14/14
Grantees still filing
9/14
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

OUR LADY STAR OF THE SEA — $17,250 · OtherOUR LADY STAR OF THE SEAOUR LADY STAR OF SEA — $10,725 · OtherOUR LADY STAR OF SEAIndividual grant recipient — $4,300 · OtherIndividual grant recipientKEARNEY CENTER — $3,000 · OtherKEARNEY CENTER+21 more — $6,357 · Other+21 moreGOOD SAMARITAN NETWORK INC — $12,500 · Human ServicesGOOD SAMARITAN NETWORK …CESC Inc — $500 · Human ServicesAda Jenkins Families and Careers Development Center Inc — $500 · Human Services+1 more — $200 · Human ServicesTHE UNIVERSITY OF CHARLESTON INC — $5,000 · EducationTHE UNIVER…UNIVERSITY OF CENTRAL FLORIDA FOUNDATION INC — $1,300 · EducationUNIVERSITY…Anas Angels Inc — $1,300 · AnimalsCOMMUNITY COMMUNICATIONS INC — $700 · Arts & CultureBOOK LOVE FOUNDATION — $300 · Arts & CultureFAMILY RENEW COMMUNITY INC — $800 · Housing & ShelterTHE BOGGY CREEK GANG INC — $300 · HealthGOD'S BATHHOUSE OF VOLUSIA — $100 · HealthSANIBEL-CAPTIVA CONSERVATION FOUNDATION — $100 · Environment
Other$41,632Human Services$13,700Education$6,300Animals$1,300Arts & Culture$1,000Housing & Shelter$800Health$400Environment$100

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetGOOD SAMARITAN NETWORK INC — $12,500 over 3y, 1.3% of budgetTHE UNIVERSITY OF CHARLESTON INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF CENTRAL FLORIDA FOUNDATION INC — $1,300 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFAMILY RENEW COMMUNITY INC — $800 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetCOMMUNITY COMMUNICATIONS INC — $700 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetCESC Inc — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAda Jenkins Families and Careers Development Center Inc — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE BOGGY CREEK GANG INC — $300 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCOUNCIL ON AGING OF VOLUSIA COUNTY INC — $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWINTER PARK DAY NURSERY INC — $200 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSANIBEL-CAPTIVA CONSERVATION FOUNDATION — $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds GOOD SAMARITAN NETWORK INC
  • Who funds THE UNIVERSITY OF CHARLESTON INC
  • Who funds Anas Angels Inc
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF CENTRAL FLORIDA FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds FAMILY RENEW COMMUNITY INC
  • Who funds COMMUNITY COMMUNICATIONS INC
  • Who funds CESC Inc
  • Who funds Ada Jenkins Families and Careers Development Center Inc
  • Who funds BOOK LOVE FOUNDATION
  • Who funds THE BOGGY CREEK GANG INC
  • Who funds COUNCIL ON AGING OF VOLUSIA COUNTY INC
  • Who funds WINTER PARK DAY NURSERY INC
  • Who funds SANIBEL-CAPTIVA CONSERVATION FOUNDATION
  • Who funds GOD'S BATHHOUSE OF VOLUSIA

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Bank of America Charitable Foundation IncNC9.2× affinity7 shared granteesties to 5 of 5Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Charities Aid Foundation America · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Kissel Family Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 40%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 4%
  • Sanibel-Captiva Conservation Foundation4% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
4get no government money at all
6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 38 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2020, released 2020. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2021) is on record but names no grant recipient in the published copy, so the figures above are from FY2020, the most recent year this funder’s grantee list reached the public record.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph