Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

Kipp Philadelphia Charter School

Together with families and communities, we create joyful, academically excellent schools that prepare students with the skills and confidence they need to pursue the paths they choose - college, career, and beyond - so they can lead fulfilling lives and build a more just world.

$1.7M
Granted FY2025still arriving
4
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$711k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Education$3.3MEnvironment$2.3MFood & Nutrition$69kHealth$33kHuman Services$25k
02FY2025 · 4 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$465,759
Median grant
1
States reached
$38M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
KIPP NORTH PHILADELPHIA CHARTER SCHOOL$710,956
KIPP WEST PHILADELPHIA ELEMENTARY ACADEMY$465,759
KIPP PHILADELPHIA OCTAVIUS CATTO CHARTER SCHOOL$307,968
KIPP DUBOIS CHARTER SCHOOL$252,535
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–18, $42k) land where the poverty rate runs at 6%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%POTENTIAL INC SPRINGTIME SCHOOL: $25k → 6%MARTIN LUTHER SCHOOL: $17k → 7%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

96%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$5.5M · 7 repeat orgs$199k to everyone else

7 repeat relationships — 4 still active in FY2025, 3 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

7
7

Total granted

$5.5M
$199k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+43%
+101%

Still filing today

86%
43%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’21’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’21’23’24’25
EducationHuman ServicesEnvironmentHealthOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • KN
    KIPP NORTH PHILADELPHIA CHARTER SCHOOL
    5× · 2021–2025 · $2.3M · revenue +124%
  • KW
    KIPP WEST PHILADELPHIA CHARTER SCHOOL
    5× · 2021–2025 · $1.5M · revenue +43%
  • KP
    KIPP PHILADELPHIA OCTAVIUS CATTO CHARTER SCHOOL
    3× · 2023–2025 · $807k · revenue +168%

Funded once

  • KD
    KIPP DUBOIS CHARTER ACADEMY
    2× · 2021–2022 · $69k
  • PY
    PHILADELPHIA YEARLY MEETING OF FRIENDS
    one grant, 2018 · $62k
  • PI
    POTENTIAL INCgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $25k · revenue +138%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Kipp Philadelphia Charter School

Together with families and communities, we create joyful, academically excellent schools that prepare students with the skills and confidence they need to pursue the paths they choose - college, career, and beyond - so they can lead…

Education
2
Mastery Charter School - Pickett Campus

All students learn the academic and personal skills they need to be truly prepared for postsecondary success and able to pursue their dreams.

Education
3
Mastery Prep Elementary Charter School

All students learn the academic and personal skills they need to be truly prepared for postsecondary success and able to pursue their dreams.

Education
4
Mastery Charter School - Mann Elementary

All students learn the academic and personal skills they need to be truly prepared for postsecondary success and able to pursue their dreams.

Education
5
Mastery Charter School - Thomas Campus

All students learn the academic and personal skills they need to be truly prepared for post-secondary success and able to pursue their dreams.

Education
6
Frederick Douglass Mastery Charter School

All students learn the academic and personal skills they need to be truly prepared for postsecondary success and able to pursue their dreams.

Education
7
Mastery Charter School - Gratz Campus

All students learn the academic and personal skills they need to be truly prepared for postsecondary success and able to pursue their dreams.

Education
8
Mastery Charter School - Smedley Elementary

All students learn the academic and personal skills they need to be truly prepared for postsecondary success and able to pursue their dreams.

Education
9
Mastery Charter School John Wister Campus

All students learn the academic and personal skills they need to be truly prepared for post-secondary success and able to pursue their dreams.

10
Kipp Administrative Services Corporation

Providing business, facility, administrative, and development support to kipp schools in the philadelphia area and awarding of scholarship grants, including educational improvement grants as defined under pennsylvania law to public…

Education
11
Mastery Charter School Pastorius - Richardson Elementary

All students learn the academic and personal skills they need to be truly prepared for post-secondary success and able to pursue their dreams.

12
Grover Cleveland-Mastery Charter School Elementary

All students learn the academic and personal skills they need to be truly prepared for post-secondary success and able to pursue their dreams.

Education

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Kipp North Philadelphia Charter School and the most unlike its peers is Potential Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 14 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
8/9
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

KIPP WEST PHILADELPHIA CHARTER SCHOOL — $1,528,117 · EducationKIPP WEST PHILADELPHIA CHARTER SCHOOLKIPP PHILADELPHIA OCTAVIUS CATTO CHARTER SCHOOL — $806,594 · EducationKIPP PHILADELPHIA OCTAVIUS CATTO CHARTER SCHOOLKIPP DUBOIS CHARTER SCHOOL — $641,701 · EducationKIPP DUBOIS CHARTER SCHOOL+2 more — $30,187 · EducationKIPP NORTH PHILADELPHIA CHARTER SCHOOL — $2,263,593 · EnvironmentKIPP NORTH PHILADELPHIA CHARTER SCHOOLSPECIALIZED EDUCATION SERVICES — $175,802 · OtherKIPP DUBOIS CHARTER ACADEMY — $69,227 · OtherPHILADELPHIA YEARLY MEETING OF FRIENDS — $61,764 · OtherTHE CAMELOT SCHOOLS OF PA LLC — $12,806 · Other+1 more — $8,315 · OtherPOTENTIAL INC — $24,886 · Human ServicesGemma Services — $16,711 · Human ServicesThe Devereux Foundation — $32,569 · Health
Education$3,006,599Environment$2,263,593Other$327,914Human Services$41,597Health$32,569

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetKIPP NORTH PHILADELPHIA CHARTER SCHOOL — $2,263,593 over 5y, 6.4% of budgetKIPP WEST PHILADELPHIA CHARTER SCHOOL — $1,528,117 over 5y, 3.2% of budgetKIPP PHILADELPHIA OCTAVIUS CATTO CHARTER SCHOOL — $806,594 over 3y, 6.1% of budgetKIPP DUBOIS CHARTER SCHOOL — $641,701 over 3y, 1.8% of budgetThe Devereux Foundation — $32,569 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPHMC Integrated — $24,987 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPOTENTIAL INC — $24,886 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetGemma Services — $16,711 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBUTTONWOOD FARMS INC — $5,200 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a set of overlaps that mostly run through you, not between each other.

Amazonsmile FoundationWA1.9× affinity5 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Kipp Philadelphia Charter School funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%your share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 14 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph