Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

King Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$19k
Granted FY2025still arriving
16
Grants FY2025still arriving
6
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Health$29kCommunity Improvement$29kFood & Nutrition$15kHuman Services$8kPublic Safety & Disaster$4kArts & Culture$2kEducation$2kYouth Development$700Other$0
02FY2025 · 16 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k15 grants · $9k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
$375
Median grant
6
States reached
$64k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Alzheimer's Research Foundation$10,000
Brain Power In A Back Pack$3,000
360 Communities$2,000
Mayo Clinic$1,000
American Red Cross$1,000
Mercy Home for Boys Girls$700
Susan G Komen$500
Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Cen$375
Metro Meals on Wheels$250
Minnesota Fraternal Order of Police$100
Operation Homefront$100
Habitat For Humanity$100
ACLU Foundation$100
Disabled American Veterans$100
Special Olympics Minnesota$100
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 20% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%Bowls for BrainPower: $1k → 5%360 Communities: $8k → 6%New Prague Area Ed Foundation: $500 → 6%Mayo Clinic: $1k → 9%ARC: $500 → 14%Alzheimer's Research Foundation: $1k → 11%Alzheimer's Research Foundation: $10k → 14%Mercy Home for Boys Girls: $700 → 14%Leadership Institute: $500 → 7%360 Communities: $5k → 6%New Prague Are Ed Foundation: $500 → 6%Mayo Clinic: $1k → 9%Alzheimer's Research Foundation: $750 → 11%360 Communities: $4k → 6%Mayo Clinic: $500 → 9%Alzheimer's Research Foundation: $500 → 11%360 Communities: $4k → 6%Mayo Clinic: $500 → 9%Alzheimer's Research Foundation: $500 → 11%360 Communities: $3k → 6%Mayo Clinic: $500 → 9%Penumbra Theatre: $1k → 14%360 Communities: $3k → 6%Mayo Clinic: $500 → 9%Penumbra Theatre: $500 → 14%Brain Power In A Back Pack: $3k → 6%Mayo Clinic: $500 → 9%Penumbra Theatre: $500 → 14%Brain Power In A Back Pack: $2k → 6%Alzheimer's Association: $2k → 11%360 Communities: $2k → 6%Alzheimer's Association: $2k → 11%Brain Power In A Back Pack: $2k → 6%Alzheimer's Association: $500 → 11%Brain Power In A Back Pack: $2k → 6%Alzheimer's Association: $500 → 11%Brain Power In A Back Pack: $2k → 6%Alzheimer's Association: $500 → 11%Salvation Army: $600 → 14%Brain Power In A Back Pack: $1k → 6%Alzheimer's Association: $500 → 11%Salvation Army: $500 → 14%Burnsville-Eagan-Savage ISD 191: $1k → 6%Brain Power In A Back Pack: $1k → 6%Burnsville Senior Center: $500 → 6%American Red Cross: $1k → 11%American Cancer Society: $1k → 6%American Red Cross: $1k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

MN
IL
NY
IN
VA
MD
TN
DC
GA
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 6% of King Family Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another.

King Family Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

94%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$81k · 18 repeat orgs$5k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +64% since the first grant, against +24% for the ones you funded once.

18 repeat relationships — 7 still active in FY2025, 11 since wound down; 8 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

18
9

Total granted

$81k
$4k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+64%
+24%

Still filing today

33%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 92% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthCommunity ImprovementArts & CulturePhilanthropyFood & NutritionCivil RightsOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • 3C
    360 Communities
    7× · 2017–2025 · $29k · revenue +155%
  • AR
    ALZHEIMERS RESEARCH FOUNDATION INC
    7× · 2017–2025 · $13k · revenue +322%
  • TS
    The Susan G Komen Breast Cancer Foundation Inc
    4× · 2017–2025 · $1k · revenue +47%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2022 · $1k
  • BI
    Burnsville-Eagan-Savage ISD 191
    one grant, 2023 · $1k
  • NP
    New Prague Area Ed Foundation
    one grant, 2023 · $500

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
American Academy of Neurology

The Academy's mission is to enhance member career fulfillment and promote brain health for all.

Community Improvement
2
Arc Research Institute

Our mission is to accelerate scientific progress, understand the root causes of disease, and narrow the gap between discoveries and impact on patients.

Health
3
Asco Association

Asco association promotes the common business interests of its members by: (1) advocating for policies that improve the quality of cancer care; (2) maintaining the highest standards of oncology medical care through programs supporting…

Community Improvement
4
Minnesota Medical Association

To be the leading voice of medicine to make minnesota the healthiest state and the best place to practice.

5
Association of American Medical Colleges

Aamc leads & serves the academic medicine community to improve the health of people everywhere.

Education
6
Federation of State Medical Boards of the United States Inc

The fsmb serves as the voice for state medical boards, supporting them through education, assessment, research and advocacy while providing services and initiatives that promote patient safety, quality health care and regulatory best…

Health
7
City of Hope

City of Hope's mission is to make hope a reality for all touched by cancer and diabetes. PLEASE SEE SCHEDULE O FOR A CONTINUATION OF OUR MISSION

Health
8
Banner -University Medical Group

Assist banner health complete its mission to make health care easier so life can be better by providing integrated & coordinated care & population health management.

Health
9
American Association for the Advancement of Science

Advance science, engineering, and innovation throughout the world for the benefit of all. the world's largest multidisciplinary scientific society and a leading publisher of cutting-edge research through its science family of journals,…

Science & Tech
10
American Society of Clinical Oncology Inc

See schedule o:asco is a professional oncology society committed to conquering cancer through research, education, and promotion of the highest quality patient care.

Health
11
United States Naval Institute

Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.

12
National Comprehensive Cancer Network

To define and advance quality, effective, equitable, and accessible cancer care and prevention so all people can live better lives.

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is American Cancer Society Inc and the most unlike its peers is Special Olympics Minnesota Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

05the grantee network

15 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 15 of the 37 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
15/15
Grantees still filing
8/15
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Brain Power In A Back Pack — $13,250 · OtherBrain Power In A Back PackAlzheimer's Association — $5,900 · OtherAlzheimer's AssociationAmerican Red Cross — $3,800 · OtherAmerican Red CrossBurnsville Senior Center — $3,200 · OtherBurnsville Senior CenterSALVATION ARMY — $2,000 · Other+19 more — $9,574 · Other+19 more360 Communities — $29,200 · Community Improvement360 Communities+1 more — $100 · Community ImprovementALZHEIMERS RESEARCH FOUNDATION INC — $13,050 · HealthALZHEIMERS RESEARCH FOUNDA…MAYO CLINIC — $5,000 · HealthMAYO CLINICAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC — $1,550 · HealthAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY IN…The Susan G Komen Breast Cancer Foundation Inc — $1,050 · Health+2 more — $300 · HealthPENUMBRA THEATRE COMPANY INC — $2,000 · Arts & CultureLeadership Institute — $500 · Public BenefitMETRO MEALS ON WHEELS INC — $250 · Food & NutritionMARINE TOYS FOR TOTS FOUNDATION — $200 · PhilanthropyAMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION FOUNDATION INC — $100 · Civil Rights
Other$37,724Community Improvement$29,300Health$20,950Arts & Culture$2,000Public Benefit$500Food & Nutrition$250Philanthropy$200Civil Rights$100

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budget360 Communities — $29,200 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetALZHEIMERS RESEARCH FOUNDATION INC — $13,050 over 7y, 0.4% of budgetMAYO CLINIC — $5,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetPENUMBRA THEATRE COMPANY INC — $2,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC — $1,550 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetThe Susan G Komen Breast Cancer Foundation Inc — $1,050 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetLeadership Institute — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMETRO MEALS ON WHEELS INC — $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMARINE TOYS FOR TOTS FOUNDATION — $200 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC — $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION FOUNDATION INC — $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetOPERATION HOMEFRONT INC — $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetParkinson Research Foundation Inc — $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe American Legion — $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds 360 Communities
  • Who funds ALZHEIMERS RESEARCH FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds MAYO CLINIC
  • Who funds PENUMBRA THEATRE COMPANY INC
  • Who funds AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC
  • Who funds The Susan G Komen Breast Cancer Foundation Inc
  • Who funds Leadership Institute
  • Who funds METRO MEALS ON WHEELS INC
  • Who funds MARINE TOYS FOR TOTS FOUNDATION
  • Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC
  • Who funds AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds OPERATION HOMEFRONT INC
  • Who funds Parkinson Research Foundation Inc
  • Who funds SPECIAL OLYMPICS MINNESOTA INC
  • Who funds The American Legion

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a set of overlaps that mostly run through you, not between each other.

Amazonsmile FoundationWA3.3× affinity4 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization King Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 20%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    2get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 37 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph