· Private foundation
Kim and Nicole Bang Family Foundation Inc
Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What it funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.
Where the money goes
Grants by size, and the largest recipients.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| ENGLEWOOD SHTIEBEL | $6,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $5,250 |
| EAST HILL SYNAGOGUE | $4,860 |
| DAILY GIVING | $3,456 |
| Individual grant recipient | $2,050 |
| CONGREGATION AHAVATH TORAH | $1,800 |
| CTEEN UPPER WEST SIDE | $1,800 |
| Individual grant recipient | $1,260 |
| FRIENDSHIP CIRCLE OF BROOKLYN | $1,000 |
| SILVER HILL HOSPITAL | $900 |
| DARCHAI MENACHEM | $500 |
Does the money reach high-need areas?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.
Its human-services grants (FY22–22, $5k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
How this is measured
Which US states its grants reach
How this is measured
Who it funds again
Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.
Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +17% since the first grant, against +11% for those funded once.
25 repeat relationships: 7 still active in FY2024, 18 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 80% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $6k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
How this is measured
Backed again, and grew
- YOYESHIVAS OHR V'DAAS7× · 2017–2023 · $9k · revenue +13%
- CLCHAI LIFELINE INC5× · 2018–2023 · $8k · revenue +44%
- DGDAILY GIVING INC2× · 2023–2024 · $7k · revenue +17%
Funded once
- YSYAM SHLOMO INCone grant, 2023 · $20k · revenue -66%
- AFAMERICAN FRIENDS OF YAD ELIEZERgraduatedone grant, 2022 · $5k · revenue +30%
- MOMIGDAL OHRone grant, 2023 · $3k
How this is measured
Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
Closest unfunded matches
The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Support of tzohar-a school for special needs children located in israel
To further jewish education in israel
Support of tzohar-a school for special needs children located in israel
To promote, benefit, and support Jewish religious, charitable & educational activities in Israel and the USA.
Raise funds for religious and educational institutions in the state of israel, and to provide educational and social improvement for the children of kiryat arba, israel.
To provide assistance to yeshivat nahar shalom, an educational institution located in israel.
To promote benefit and support Jewish religious, charitable and educational activities in Israel and the USA.
Provides day care in the heart of tel-aviv. provides afternoon activities for young children and youth. there are evening classes for adults covering a variety of subjects.
To promote and support jewish religious charitable and educational activities in israel & usa.
How this is measured
22 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.
How this is measured
Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 22 of the 74 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.
Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee
Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding
A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds YAM SHLOMO INC ↗
- Who funds YESHIVAS OHR V'DAAS ↗
- Who funds CHAI LIFELINE INC ↗
- Who funds DAILY GIVING INC ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF YAD ELIEZER ↗
- Who funds MEOR INC ↗
- Who funds CAMP HASC INC ↗
- Who funds The Frisch School ↗
- Who funds LEV LALEV INC ↗
- Who funds CHASDEI DEVORAH INC ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM ↗
- Who funds TIKVA CORP ↗
- Who funds PEF ISRAEL ENDOWMENT FUNDS INC ↗
- Who funds SILVER HILL HOSPITAL INC ↗
Co-funders
Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Jewish Communal Fund · The Ojc Fund · M D Katz Foundation Inc · David & Esther Muschel Foundation · Jewish Federation of Northern New Jersey Inc · Cross River Community Foundation · Jewish Federation of Cleveland · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · David and Adrienne Greenblatt Foundation · The Daniel E and Joyce G Straus Family Foundation · The Blumenfeld Family Foundation · The Alan and Elisa Pines Family Foundation Inc
How this is measured
How much its grantees rely on government
Each dot is one organization Kim and Nicole Bang Family Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Kim and Nicole Bang Family Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.
- The Frisch School: 0% of income from government
- Silver Hill Hospital Inc: 0% of income from government
How this is measured
Play a game based on Kim and Nicole Bang Family’s filings →