Skip to content

New Jersey · Private foundation

Kim and Nicole Bang Family Foundation Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$29k
Granted FY2024(still arriving)
11
Grants FY2024
30
Organizations funded FY2023
53%
First-time grantees FY2023
Read the full brief
Median grant, FY2024
$1,800
Largest grant, FY2024
$6,000
Organizations funded a year
9 to 30
FY2017 to FY2023
States reached, FY2024
3
Total assets, FY2024
$998k
Applications
Takes unsolicited applications
Per its most recent filing; check its own site

How open it is to new grantees

In FY2023, 53% of the organizations Kim and Nicole Bang Family Foundation Inc funded were first-time grantees, receiving 61% of its grant dollars.

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 39% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $43k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23
InternationalReligionPhilanthropyHealthEducationHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
The numbers by year
Fiscal yearOrganizations fundedTo those organizationsFirst-time grantees
FY2024still arriving11$29k36%
FY202330$70k53%
FY202215$32k53%
FY202120$31k60%
FY202011$13k27%
FY201916$17k69%
FY201814$16k71%
FY20179$19kn/a
80% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Religion$126kInternational$18kHealth$15kEducation$15kPhilanthropy$10kHuman Services$5kRecreation & Sports$3kArts & Culture$2kOther$0

Where its grants go

Grant dollars by states, across the years we hold.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
IL
NY
PA
NJ
CT
CA
UT
VA
MD
DC
TX
FL

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2017 to FY2024, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
East Hill Synagogue$55,4818n/a
Yam Shlomo Inc$20,00014%
Englewood Shtiebel Inc$12,0002n/a
Yeshivas Ohr V'Daas$8,70070%
Chai Lifeline Inc$7,67050%
Daily Giving Inc$6,91220%
American Friends of Yad Eliezer$5,40010%
Meor Inc$4,05040%
Camp Hasc Inc$3,60020%
The Frisch School$3,60020%
Show all 33 grantees
All grantees of Kim and Nicole Bang Family Foundation Inc by total granted
GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
East Hill Synagogue$55,4818n/a
Yam Shlomo Inc$20,00014%
Englewood Shtiebel Inc$12,0002n/a
Yeshivas Ohr V'Daas$8,70070%
Chai Lifeline Inc$7,67050%
Daily Giving Inc$6,91220%
American Friends of Yad Eliezer$5,40010%
Meor Inc$4,05040%
Camp Hasc Inc$3,60020%
The Frisch School$3,60020%
Lev Lalev Inc$2,50010%
Chasdei Devorah Inc$2,50011%
Yeshiva Ohr Simcha of Englewood Inc$2,1602n/a
Lubavitch on the Palisades$2,1602n/a
American Friends of Magen David Adom$1,80010%
Tikva Corp$1,80020%
Cteen Upper West Side Inc$1,8001n/a
Congregation Ahavath Torah$1,8001n/a
Darchai Menachem Inc$1,7655n/a
Silver Hill Hospital Inc$1,40020%
Friendship Circle of Brooklyn Inc$1,00010%
Neighborhood Funders Group$1,00010%
Shiloh Israel Children's Fund Inc$90010%
American Friends of Shalva Israel Inc$72010%
Congregation Beis Ephraim$6301n/a
National Park Foundation$54020%
Mosdot Shuva Israel$5001n/a
Healthright International Inc$50010%
Netzah Yisrael$3781n/a
The Center for Jewish Family Life Inc$3601n/a
Colel Chabad$3601n/a
Chabad Lubavitch of Utah Inc$3601n/a
Hasc Pa Inc$18012%

What it could do for these grantees

Plus 40 recipients with no EIN on record ($73k), not named here.

Where it is load-bearing

Each grantee by its size and the share of its budget Kim and Nicole Bang Family Foundation Inc supplied at peak.

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetYam Shlomo Inc: $20,000 over 1y, 3.9% of budgetYeshivas Ohr V'Daas: $8,700 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetChai Lifeline Inc: $7,670 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetDaily Giving Inc: $6,912 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican Friends of Yad Eliezer: $5,400 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMeor Inc: $4,050 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetCamp Hasc Inc: $3,600 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetThe Frisch School: $3,600 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetLev Lalev Inc: $2,500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetChasdei Devorah Inc: $2,500 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetAmerican Friends of Magen David Adom: $1,800 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTikva Corp: $1,800 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSilver Hill Hospital Inc: $1,400 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFriendship Circle of Brooklyn Inc: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetNeighborhood Funders Group: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetShiloh Israel Children's Fund Inc: $900 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetAmerican Friends of Shalva Israel Inc: $720 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNational Park Foundation: $540 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHealthright International Inc: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHasc Pa Inc: $180 over 1y, 1.9% of budget

Tap a dot to name the grantee.

How this is measured
Share of budget is the funder’s grant in a year over the grantee’s total revenue that year, at its highest across the years we hold; revenue is from all sources. Only grantees confirmed against their own filings, whose grants do not exceed their revenue, are plotted: the largest 20.

Nonprofits that may fit its grantmaking

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Jewish Communal FundNY33.7× affinity20 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Jewish Communal Fund · The Ojc Fund · M D Katz Foundation Inc · David & Esther Muschel Foundation · Jewish Federation of Northern New Jersey Inc · Cross River Community Foundation · Jewish Federation of Cleveland · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · David and Adrienne Greenblatt Foundation · The Daniel E and Joyce G Straus Family Foundation · The Blumenfeld Family Foundation · The Alan and Elisa Pines Family Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Compare Kim and Nicole Bang Family Foundation Inc with peer funders

About Kim and Nicole Bang Family Foundation Inc

How much does Kim and Nicole Bang Family Foundation Inc give?
Kim and Nicole Bang Family Foundation Inc reported 11 grants totaling $28,876 in its FY2024 IRS filing. It funded between 9 and 30 organizations a year over FY2017 to FY2023.
What does Kim and Nicole Bang Family Foundation Inc fund?
By grant dollars over FY2017 to FY2024, its largest causes are Religion (55%), International (8%), Health (7%).
Who are Kim and Nicole Bang Family Foundation Inc's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2017 to FY2024: East Hill Synagogue ($55k), Yam Shlomo Inc ($20k), Englewood Shtiebel Inc ($12k).
Does Kim and Nicole Bang Family Foundation Inc fund new organizations?
In FY2023, 53% of the organizations it funded were first-time grantees.
Does Kim and Nicole Bang Family Foundation Inc accept unsolicited applications?
Its most recent filing reports that it accepts unsolicited grant applications.
Which funders back the same organizations as Kim and Nicole Bang Family Foundation Inc?
Its strongest co-funders, measured against what their size predicts, include Jewish Communal Fund, The Ojc Fund, M D Katz Foundation Inc.
Where is Kim and Nicole Bang Family Foundation Inc based?
Kim and Nicole Bang Family Foundation Inc is based in NJ.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 74 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Kim and Nicole Bang Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph