· Private foundation
Kilpatrick Rose-Neath Foundation Inc
Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| LOUISIANA STATE TROOPERS ASSOCIATION | $3,000 |
| ST PAULS EPISCOPAL CHURCH | $2,000 |
| ICE INSTITUTE FOR BIZ CAMP | $1,500 |
| HOLY ANGELS | $1,100 |
| WILDLIFE EDUCATION AND REHAB | $1,000 |
| RED CROSS OF NWLA | $1,000 |
| CADDO CAREER TECHNOLOGY CENTER | $1,000 |
| VOLUNTEERS OF AMERICA | $1,000 |
| RED RIVER RADIO | $1,000 |
| SHREVEPORT LITTLE THEATRE | $1,000 |
| INNER CITY ROW MODERN DANCE | $1,000 |
| BOSSIER ARTS COUNCIL | $1,000 |
| RESOURCES ACCESS SERVICES ASSOCIATION | $500 |
| SOCIAL THERAPY PROJECT | $500 |
| GOODWILL | $500 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $25k) land where the poverty rate runs at 18%, against an area that typically sits at 20%. 51% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of 0% since the first grant, against -3% for the ones you funded once.
44 repeat relationships — 17 still active in FY2024, 27 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 80% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $4k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- G4GEAUX 4 KIDS7× · 2018–2024 · $12k · revenue +405%
- LSLOUISIANA STATE TROOPERS ASSN5× · 2020–2024 · $12k · revenue +57%
- YWYOUNG WOMENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF NORTHWEST LOUISIANA INC4× · 2020–2023 · $10k · revenue +3%
Funded once
- CCCENTENARY COLLEGE PRESSone grant, 2018 · $6k
- RRRed River Film Society Incone grant, 2017 · $4k · revenue -5%
- LELOUISIANA EXHIBIT MUSEUMone grant, 2020 · $2k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To manage cultural events while preserving the state theatre of louisiana - the historic strand.
Shreveport Common Inc mission is to facilitate public/private partnerships to implement the Shreveport Common Vision Plan for an Arts-Inspired revitalization of Shreveport Common to an UNcommon Creative Cultural Community.
Promotion of the arts within the Central Louisiana community parishes
Promote and support development of the local Shreveport Symphony, the Nena Plant Wideman competition, and to further the appreciation of symphonic music and allied arts through education
Baton Rouge Symphony League, Inc. serves the interest of the Baton Rouge Symphony Orchestra by fostering music appreciation among children and adults and by giving volunteer service and financial support to the Louisiana Symphony…
To provide cultural enhancement in northeast louisiana through concerts, art, and similar projects.
Cultural artistic performances to promote and preserve the art of classical ballet in the community
The lake charles symphony, inc., is a non-profit cultural and educational organization whose purpose is to provide cultural enrichment for the community, to promote education in and appreciation of symphonic music to the children of…
Schedule o
The sole mission of the foundation is to support, enhance and assist the lsu health sciences center at shreveport in its many endeavors.
The purpose of the organization is to support the financial well being and advancement of the programs and activities of the LSU Museum of Art.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Shreveport Opera and the most unlike its peers is Friends of Marjorie Lyons Playhouse Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 32 years old; the field is 14. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 23% startups (under 5 years old) — 4% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 18% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
27 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 27 of the 79 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds GEAUX 4 KIDS ↗
- Who funds LOUISIANA STATE TROOPERS ASSN ↗
- Who funds YOUNG WOMENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF NORTHWEST LOUISIANA INC ↗
- Who funds LITERACY VOLUNTEERS AT CENTENARY ↗
- Who funds FELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES ↗
- Who funds INTER CITY ROW MODERN DANCE COMPANY ↗
- Who funds Red River Film Society Inc ↗
- Who funds PRICE HARRIS EVANGELIST ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds THE ARC CADDO-BOSSIER ↗
- Who funds SHREVEPORT SYMPHONY INC ↗
- Who funds Friends of Marjorie Lyons Playhouse Inc ↗
- Who funds Louisiana Cultural Economy Foundation ↗
- Who funds SHREVEPORT OPERA ↗
- Who funds WILDLIFE EDUCATION & REHABILITATION ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Community Foundation of North Louisiana · Carolyn W & Charles T Beaird Family Foundation · Shreveport Regional Arts Council · The Powers Foundation Inc · Zadeck Family Foundation · American Electric Power Foundation · Nell E Shehee Foundation Trust · J B Atkins Foundation · The Crow Foundation · Grayson Foundation Inc · Noel Foundation Inc · United Way of Northwest Louisiana
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Kilpatrick Rose-Neath Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.