Loading…
· Private foundation
KILPATRICK ROSE-NEATH FOUNDATION INC
This foundation accepts unsolicited grant applications.
$21k
Granted FY2024
23
Grants
1
Communities
$3k
Largest
01What you fund
01
What you funded, over time
By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).
A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 87% of KILPATRICK ROSE-NEATH FOUNDATION INC’s grantee dollars go to organizations outside the IRS cause taxonomy (common for large international and research funders), so a chart would be mostly “unclassified” and misrepresent the portfolio.
02beneath the categories
Past the labels — and the year it shifted
Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.
…and in their own words, year by year
2018
centenarybossierredvolunteers
2019
bossierinterred
2020
centenaryvolunteers
2021
museumcentenaryvolunteers
2022
centenaryrednwlavolunteers
2023
rednwla
2024
bossierred
Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.
03FY2024 · 23 grants
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
$1,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$603k
Total assets
Largest grants
- LOUISIANA STATE TROOPERS ASSOCIATION$3,000
- ST PAULS EPISCOPAL CHURCH$2,000
- ICE INSTITUTE FOR BIZ CAMP$1,500
- HOLY ANGELS$1,100
- SHREVEPORT LITTLE THEATRE$1,000
- RED CROSS OF NWLA$1,000
- VOLUNTEERS OF AMERICA$1,000
- INNER CITY ROW MODERN DANCE$1,000
- CADDO CAREER TECHNOLOGY CENTER$1,000
- WILDLIFE EDUCATION AND REHAB$1,000
- RED RIVER RADIO$1,000
- BOSSIER ARTS COUNCIL$1,000
- GEAUX 4 KIDS$500
- RESOURCES ACCESS SERVICES ASSOCIATION$500
- SOCIAL THERAPY PROJECT$500
02The need
04
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
show:
Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $15k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15% — the area typically sits at 20%. 20% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
03Your edge
repeat funding
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
83%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$209k · 44 repeat orgs$43k to everyone else
44 repeat relationships — 17 still active in FY2024, 27 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Re-uppedFunded once
Organizations
44
31
Total granted
$209k
$39k
Median revenue growth · since first grant
+18%
+31%
Still filing today
25%
10%
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 80% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $4k went to new ones.
RenewedFirst-time
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
Arts & CultureHuman ServicesEducationReligionAnimalsHousing & ShelterOther
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- G4GEAUX 4 KIDS7× · 2018–2024 · $12k · revenue +405%
- LSLOUISIANA STATE TROOPERS ASSOCIATION5× · 2020–2024 · $12k · revenue +51%
- TSTHE SHREVEPORT SYMPHONY3× · 2022–2024 · $3k · revenue +1%
Funded once
- CCCENTENARY COLLEGE PRESSone grant, 2018 · $6k
- RFROBINSON FILM CENTERone grant, 2017 · $4k
- FOFRIENDS OF THE MARJORIE LYONS PLAYHOUSEone grant, 2021 · $2k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
04Your field
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
1
Shreveport Symphony Guild Inc
Promote and support development of the local Shreveport Symphony, the Nena Plant Wideman competition, and to further the appreciation of symphonic music and allied arts through education
Arts & Culture
2
Little Theatre of Shreveport
The operation of a community theatre which presents various live theatrical productions to the general public.
Arts & Culture
3
The Strand Theatre of Shreveport
To manage cultural events while preserving the state theatre of louisiana - the historic strand.
—
4
Shreveport Common Inc
Shreveport Common Inc mission is to facilitate public/private partnerships to implement the Shreveport Common Vision Plan for an Arts-Inspired revitalization of Shreveport Common to an UNcommon Creative Cultural Community.
Community Improvement
5
Baton Rouge Symphony League Inc
Baton Rouge Symphony League, Inc. serves the interest of the Baton Rouge Symphony Orchestra by fostering music appreciation among children and adults and by giving volunteer service and financial support to the Louisiana Symphony…
Arts & Culture
6
Shreveport Metropolitan Ballet
Cultural artistic performances to promote and preserve the art of classical ballet in the community
Arts & Culture
7
Backbeat Foundation Inc
The Backbeat Foundation's mission is to foster support of the rich New Orleans cultural heritage through the presentation of innovative arts and music programming and community based events and projects. The Foundation provides resources…
Arts & Culture
8
Christus Health Central Louisiana
Supporting the health care ministries of the sponsoring congregations in extending the healing ministry of jesus christ in comformity with the roman catholic church.
Health
9
Opera Theatre of Saint Louis
Opera Theatre's mission is to shape a vibrant future for opera by connecting, inspiring, and entertaining our communities; to foster the next generation; and to make opera accessible and inclusive.
Arts & Culture
10
Abilene Opera Association
Promotes opera in West Texas by producing an annual or biannual opera or other musical production, as well as master classes and other educational presentations.
Arts & Culture
11
Christus Health Southwestern Louisiana
Supporting the health care ministries of the sponsoring congregations in extending the healing ministry of jesus christ in conformity with the roman catholic church.
Health
12
Louisiana Symphony Association
To provide a symphony orchestra, and to provide educational and cultural enrichment for the people of greater baton rouge and the state of louisiana.
—
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Shreveport Opera and the most unlike its peers is Friends of Marjorie Lyons Playhouse Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network
18 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.
0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
16/18
Grantees still filing
11/18
Grew since you first funded
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Other$219,450Human Services$15,000Arts & Culture$8,000Education$4,500Religion$3,500Animals$550Housing & Shelter$500International$500
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds GEAUX 4 KIDS ↗
- Who funds LOUISIANA STATE TROOPERS ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds LITERACY VOLUNTEERS AT CENTENARY COLLEGE ↗
- Who funds PRICE HARRIS EVANGELISTIC ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds THE SHREVEPORT SYMPHONY ↗
- Who funds ARC OF CADDO BOSSIER ↗
- Who funds SHREVEPORT OPERA ↗
- Who funds LOUISIANA CULTURAL ECONOMY FOUNDATION ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
The Community Foundation of NorthLA28.7× affinity11 shared granteesties to 9 of 9Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →
Open a dossier: The Community Foundation of North · Carolyn W & Charles T Beaird · Nell E Shehee Foundation Trust · The Powers Foundation Inc · Shreveport Regional Arts Council · Zadeck Family Foundation · Grayson Foundation Inc · American Electric Power Foundation · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organisation KILPATRICK ROSE-NEATH FOUNDATION INC funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
2025
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
05Through Plinth
Through Plinth
Your grantmaking, live and operational
This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: LITERACY VOLUNTEERS AT CENTENARY COLLEGE.
Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk
Financial management
insufficient risk
Limited financial data in public filings.
Track record & reputation
low risk
8 years of Form 990 filings, still active.
Legal standing
low risk
US 501(c)(3); EIN 721124343 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.
Governance
Live in Plinth
Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.
Compliance & sanctions
Live in Plinth
OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.
Program capacity
Live in Plinth
Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.
Live · Plinth’s real DD engine
Run the actual assessment on LITERACY VOLUNTEERS AT CENTENARY COLLEGE, cold from public data.
Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.
Post-award monitoring · continuous checks
- Awaiting reportFinancial stability— Runway not derivable from filings.
- On trackSustained operations— Filing through 2025; revenue held over the period.
- On trackReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 2% of their budget — diversified.
- Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.
What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.
Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing
Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro
How do I get to Kilpatrick Rose-Neath Foundation Inc?
Find your warmest path to Kilpatrick Rose-Neath Foundation Inc through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.
Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.
More from the funding graph
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars pass through an intermediary
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
Strange bedfellows
the named clusters of US funding
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home
State money flows
the interactive map of money crossing state lines