Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

Kids Charities

To promote activities to generate monies for distribution to charitites for kids located primarily in the antelope valley.

$70k
Granted FY2021
1
Grants FY2021
1
States reached
$70k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172021.

Human Services$134kYouth Development$59kHealth$21kEducation$16kRecreation & Sports$10k
02FY2021 · 1 grant

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$70,012
Median grant
1
States reached
$33k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
VARIOUS CHILDRENS CHARITIES$70,012
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY17–21) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 95% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%ROYAL FAMILY KIDS CAMP: $10k → 10%SOUNDER FOUNDATION: $5k → 14%AV GUILD CHILDRENS HOSPITAL: $5k → 14%VARIOUS CHILDRENS CHARITIES: $70k → 14%NEIBORHOOD IMPACT: $40k → 14%GRACE RESOURCES: $10k → 14%DESERT VINEYARD: $9k → 14%DESERT CHRISTIAN SCHOOLS: $8k → 14%CARENET: $5k → 14%AV SADDLE UP THERAPEUTIC: $11k → 14%VARIOUS SMALL CHECKS: $36k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Childrens Center of the Antelope Valley

To promote healing of the whole person and a healthier community by providing care and services to empower children, individuals, and families to overcome life's difficulties.

Crime & Legal
2
West Valley Boys & Girls Club Inc

To improve the health, social, educational, vocational and character development of boys and girls presiding in the West San Fernando Valley; to offer guidance to them for their continued development as productive members of society.

Unclassified
3
Boys and Girls Clubs of Coachella Valley Foundation

The Foundation is organized to encourage and administer gifts in support of the operation, growth, development and perpetuity of the Boys and Girls Club of Coachella Valley, its programs, facilities and activities

4
Partnership for Children

To increase access to medical care for children with serious illnesses and support their families.

Human Services
5
Variety Childrens Charities of the Desert Tent 66

To deliver life-changing programs that give Coachella Valley children a better future.

Human Services
6
Boys & Girls Club of South San Luis Obispo County

To operate a boys and girls club facility and after-school and summer camp programs for all area children regardless of ability to pay in the Five Cities area of San Luis Obispo County.

Youth Development
7
Valley Teen Ranch

To provide HOPE to vulnerable children, youth, and families through life changing relationships and experiences.

Human Services
8
Boys & Girls Club of Palm Springs

A community youth center located in Palm Springs - with mission to enable and inspire young people, especially those who need us most, to reach their full potential as productive, caring, responsible citizens.

9
Antelope Valley Medical Center Foundation

To support Antelope Valley Medical Center and their health care programs.

Health
10
La Paloma Family Services Inc

We build relationships that enhance the development of skills, foster a sense of worth and enhance a belief in each child's individual potential.

11
Camp Alandale

To introduce abused children to the life changing and healing reality of Jesus Christ and equip them to lead meaningful and productive lives.

12
La Visionaria Guild of Valley Childrens Healthcare

To engage in creative and innovate ways to raise funds, advocate for children and promote goodwill for Valley Children's Hospital.

Human Services

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is For the Children and the most unlike its peers is Grace Resource Center Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 15 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/11
Grantees still filing
6/11
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

VARIOUS CHILDRENS CHARITIES — $70,012 · OtherVARIOUS CHILDRENS CHARITIESFRIENDS OF THE ANTELOPE VALLEY FAIR — $40,000 · OtherFRIENDS OF THE ANTELOPE VALLEY FAIRVARIOUS SMALL CHECKS — $35,620 · OtherVARIOUS SMALL CHECKSSADDLE UP THERAPEUTIC RIDING STABLE — $11,000 · OtherINTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF LIONS CLUBS — $10,000 · OtherDESERT VINEYARD CHRISTIAN FELLOWSHIP — $9,000 · OtherDesert Christian Schools — $8,000 · OtherVALLEY OASIS SHELTER — $7,000 · Other+3 more — $16,000 · Other+3 moreGrace Resource Center Inc — $10,000 · Housing & ShelterFOR THE CHILDREN — $10,000 · Recreation & SportsTHE JACOB HEFTER FOUNDATION — $8,000 · EducationCare Net Pregnancy Center of Paradise Dayspring Crisis Pregnancy Center — $5,000 · Health
Other$206,632Housing & Shelter$10,000Recreation & Sports$10,000Education$8,000Health$5,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetFRIENDS OF THE ANTELOPE VALLEY FAIR — $40,000 over 4y, 3.1% of budgetSADDLE UP THERAPEUTIC RIDING STABLE — $11,000 over 4y, 9.9% of budgetGrace Resource Center Inc — $10,000 over 4y, 0.6% of budgetFOR THE CHILDREN — $10,000 over 4y, 0.5% of budgetTHE JACOB HEFTER FOUNDATION — $8,000 over 4y, 16% of budgetCare Net Pregnancy Center of Paradise Dayspring Crisis Pregnancy Center — $5,000 over 4y, 3.4% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds FRIENDS OF THE ANTELOPE VALLEY FAIR
  • Who funds SADDLE UP THERAPEUTIC RIDING STABLE
  • Who funds Grace Resource Center Inc
  • Who funds FOR THE CHILDREN
  • Who funds THE JACOB HEFTER FOUNDATION
  • Who funds Care Net Pregnancy Center of Paradise Dayspring Crisis Pregnancy Center
  • Who funds ANTELOPE VALLEY GUILD OF CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL LOS ANGELES

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

California Community FoundationCA15.4× affinity6 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: California Community Foundation · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Kids Charities funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    04Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Kids Charities?

    Find your warmest path to Kids Charities through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 15 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2021, released 2021. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2025) is on record but names no grant recipient (grants abroad are filed by region only, and grants under $5,000 are not itemized), so the figures above are from FY2021, the most recent year this funder named its grantees.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph