Skip to content

· Private foundation

Kibble Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$255k
Granted FY2025still arriving
15
Grants FY2025still arriving
7
States reached
$164k
Largest
01What it funds
0188% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$1.7MFood & Nutrition$43kHealth$38kReligion$35kMembership Benefit$26kAnimals$21kHuman Services$20kPublic Safety & Disaster$19kOther$0
02FY2025 · 15 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k12 grants · $43k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $47k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $164k
$3,500
Median grant
7
States reached
$4.0M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
OHIO UNIVERSITY$164,250
UNIVERSITY OF RIO GRANDE$31,500
WASHINGTON STATE COMMUNITY COLLEGE$15,750
HIAWATHA PTO$8,500
Individual grant recipient$5,000
LONG BOTTOM UNITED METHODIST CHURCH$4,500
GREATER MARIETTA COMMUNITY FOOD PANTRY$3,750
DARTMOUTH COLLEGE$3,500
OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY$3,500
MIAMI UNIVERSITY$3,500
WEST VIRGINIA UNIVERSITY - PARKERSBURG$3,500
GOLDEN HARVEST FOOD PANTRY$2,500
OKEMOS COMMUNITY CHURCH$2,000
HUMANE SOCIETY OF THE OHIO VALLEY$2,000
ST VINCENT DE PAUL SOCIETY$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 19%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 99% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%PA-HART: $15k → 12%NATIONAL BREAST CANCER FOUNDATION INC: $6k → 5%MULBERRY COMMUNITY FOOD PANTRY: $7k → 17%HIAWATHA PTO: $9k → 9%ST JUDE'S CHILDRENS HOSPITAL: $5k → 17%CHESTER FIRE DEPARTMENT: $5k → 6%OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY: $6k → 15%HOCKING COLLEGE: $6k → 15%WASHINGTON STATE COMMUNITY COLLEGE: $16k → 15%SHRINERS HOSPITAL OF CINCINNATI: $5k → 16%CHESTER METHODIST CHURCH: $10k → 17%OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY: $14k → 19%RIO GRANDE UNIVERSITY: $45k → 20%OHIO UNIVERSITY: $164k → 22%PA-HART: $8k → 12%HIAWATHA PTO: $7k → 9%HOCKING COLLEGE: $6k → 15%BRAVA: $15k → 15%LONG BOTTOM METHODIST: $10k → 18%RIO GRANDE UNIVERSITY: $39k → 20%OHIO UNIVERSITY: $135k → 22%WOMENS CENTER OF GREATER LANSING: $15k → 16%MARIETTA COLLEGE: $14k → 15%GOLDEN HARVEST FOOD PANTRY: $8k → 18%RIO GRANDE UNIVERSITY: $39k → 20%OHIO UNIVERSITY: $101k → 22%AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY OF: $5k → 15%MARIETTA COLLEGE: $12k → 15%LONG BOTTOM METHODIST: $7k → 18%UNIVERSITY OF RIO GRANDE: $32k → 20%OHIO UNIVERSITY: $67k → 22%RUSTY GREGORY: $8k → 15%GOLDEN HARVEST FOOD PANTRY: $7k → 18%WASHINGTON STATE COMMUNITY COLLEGE: $7k → 15%SAND HILL CEMETERY: $6k → 18%WASHINGTON STATE COMMUNITY COLLEGE: $7k → 15%LONG BOTTOM SAND HILL CEMETERY: $5k → 18%WASHINGTON STATE COMMUNITY COLLEGE: $7k → 15%LONG BOTTOM METHODIST: $5k → 18%MARIETTA COLLEGE: $7k → 15%LONG BOTTOM METHODIST: $5k → 18%HUMANE SOCIETY OF OHIO RIVER VALLEY: $5k → 15%SAND HILL CEMETERY: $5k → 18%WASHINGTON COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY: $5k → 15%SAND HILL CEMETERY: $5k → 18%SAND HILL CEMETERY: $5k → 18%LONG BOTTOM UNITED METHODIST CHURCH: $5k → 18%TUPPERS PLAINS FIRE DEPT: $8k → 18%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NH
MI
NY
IA
OH
PA
MO
WV
AR
TN
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

93%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.9M · 22 repeat orgs$145k to everyone else

22 repeat relationships: 12 still active in FY2025, 10 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

22
24

Total granted

$1.9M
$135k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+34%
+362%

Still filing today

23%
8%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 96% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $11k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationHealthFood & NutritionAnimalsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF RIO GRANDE
    4× · 2022–2025 · $167k · revenue +31%
  • MC
    Marietta College
    8× · 2017–2024 · $62k · revenue +34%
  • B
    BRAVA
    2× · 2021–2024 · $17k · revenue +171% · 64% of their budget

Funded once

  • WC
    Women's Center of Greater Lansinggraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $15k · revenue +362%
  • CM
    CHESTER METHODIST CHURCH
    one grant, 2021 · $10k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2018 · $8k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Mount Carmel College of Nursing

To operate a college of nursing

—
2
Defiance College

Defiance College graduates students to lead distinctive lives in their chosen professions through a spirit of service by preparing them to Know, To Understand, To Lead, and To Serve.

Education
3
Mercy College of Ohio

Mercy college, a catholic institution with a focus on healthcare, educates and inspires students to lead and to serve in the global community. mercy college is sponsored by bon secours mercy health and primarily focuses on healthcare and…

Health
4
Oberlin College

Oberlin college and conservatory educate students for lives of intellectual, musical and artistic rigor and breadth, sustained inquiry, creativity and innovation, and leadership. oberlin aims to prepare graduates with the knowledge,…

Education
5
Waynesburg University

Provide higher education to students in undergraduate and graduate programs

Education
6
Otterbein University

Otterbein University is a private, church-related, coeducational university that sponsors traditional and continuing education programs of liberal arts and professional education.

Education
7
Ursuline College

Ursuline college offers holistic education that transforms students for service, leadership and professional excellence by providing undergraduate and graduate programs that foster lifelong learning and personal wisdom in an environment…

Education
8
Manchester University Inc

Manchester University respects the infinite worth of every individual and graduates persons of ability and conviction who draw upon their education and faith to lead principled, productive, and compassionate lives that improve the human…

Education
9
Ohio Association of Community Colleges

Oacc is dedicated to the advancement and implementation of sound policy and initiatives that work to ensure the success of the more than 300,000 community college students in ohio. rooted in the belief that every person should have access…

Education
10
Walsh University Inc

To educate students to become leaders in service to others through a values-based education.

Education
11
LaGrange College

Education - lagrange college challenges the minds and inspires the souls of its students. founded in 1831 and committed to its relationship with the united methodist church and its wesleyan and liberal arts traditions, the college supports…

Education
12
The College of Wooster

The college of wooster works to prepare students to become leaders of character and influence.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Marietta College; the most unlike its peers is Greater Marietta Community Food Pantry. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

7 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 7 of the 49 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
7/7
Grantees still filing
6/7
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

OHIO UNIVERSITY: $1,103,735 · OtherOHIO UNIVERSITYRIO GRANDE UNIVERSITY: $186,988 · OtherRIO GRANDE UNIVERSITYWASHINGTON STATE COLLEGE OF OHIO: $76,922 · Other+40 more: $392,365 · Other+40 moreUNIVERSITY OF RIO GRANDE: $166,625 · EducationUNIVERSITY O…Marietta College: $62,450 · EducationMarietta Col…BRAVA: $16,500 · HealthNATIONAL BREAST CANCER FOUNDATION INC: $6,000 · HealthGREATER MARIETTA COMMUNITY FOOD PANTRY: $8,500 · Food & NutritionHUMANE SOCIETY OF THE OHIO VALLEY: $6,000 · Animals
Other$1,760,010Education$229,075Health$22,500Food & Nutrition$8,500Animals$6,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetUNIVERSITY OF RIO GRANDE: $166,625 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetMarietta College: $62,450 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetBRAVA: $16,500 over 2y, 64% of budgetWomen's Center of Greater Lansing: $15,000 over 1y, 15% of budgetGREATER MARIETTA COMMUNITY FOOD PANTRY: $8,500 over 3y, 6.1% of budgetNATIONAL BREAST CANCER FOUNDATION INC: $6,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHUMANE SOCIETY OF THE OHIO VALLEY: $6,000 over 3y, 0.5% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF RIO GRANDE ↗
  • Who funds Marietta College ↗
  • Who funds BRAVA ↗
  • Who funds Women's Center of Greater Lansing ↗
  • Who funds GREATER MARIETTA COMMUNITY FOOD PANTRY ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL BREAST CANCER FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds HUMANE SOCIETY OF THE OHIO VALLEY ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Peoples Bank FoundationOH15.5× affinity5 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Peoples Bank Foundation · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Kibble Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Kibble Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%5%19%42%75%funder's share of their income ↑0%8%15%22%30%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–30%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Kibble Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Kibble Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 49 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Kibble’s filings →

    More from the funding graph